Category Archives: Disputes

VAT: Staff costs – The San Domenico Vetraria SpA case

By   24 August 2020

Latest from the courts

In the San Domenico Vetraria SpA CJEU case the issue was the treatment of the secondment of staff by an Italian parent company to its subsidiary and the reimbursement by the subsidiary company of the costs incurred. Was there a VAtable supply?

Background

The issue was whether the relevant payment represented a supply of services ‘for consideration’. The parent company seconded one of its directors to its subsidiary and a charge was made based solely on a reimbursement of actual costs. The Italian domestic court ruled that the transaction was outside the scope of VAT on the basis that there was no consideration paid or received and therefore no supply of services.

Decision

The court ruled that despite the fact that the value of the payment to the parent company was limited to the parent company’s costs this did not mean that consideration for the director’s secondment was absent. Therefore, as consideration flowed in both directions, a taxable supply took place such that VAT was due, the claim of input tax made by the subsidiary was correct and the Italian authorities were incorrect to deny credit for it.

The President of the Chamber stated in the ruling that “The amount of the consideration, in particular the fact that it is equal to, greater or less than, the costs which the taxable person incurred in providing his service, is irrelevant in that regard”. It was immaterial that no profit was made, and the absence of such profit did not affect the VAT treatment.

There was a legal relationship between the provider of the service and the recipient pursuant to which there is reciprocal performance, the remuneration received by the provider of the service constituting the value actually given in return for the service supplied to the recipient.

Commentary

This is a useful clarification/confirmation. The supply was not a disbursement (details here) so it was a supply by the parent company. More on inter-company charges here.

Planning

If the recipient company was partly exempt or unable to reclaim the input tax for any reason, the VAT would have represented a real cost. So, would there be a way to avoid this charge? The answer (in the UK at least) is yes. If the director had a joint contract of employment with both companies, there would be no supply. Also, if the two companies were part of the same VAT group, the “supply” would be disregarded, so there would be no VAT cost for the subsidiary.

VAT Planning – Why?

By   20 August 2020

Why? How? Where? When? What? Who?

Why?

It is impossible for any business to do such a basic thing as set its prices properly unless it understands its VAT position and ensures that this is reflected in those prices, terms and contract terms etc. The aims of tax planning are:

  • compliance
  • business planning
  • avoiding unnecessary tax costs
  • maximising input tax claims
  • minimising VAT payable where possible
  • obtaining any refunds and retrospective claims due
  • avoiding penalties and interest

How?

The “How?” is dependent on the specific business and its needs. We offer a flexible and tailored service from start-ups to multi-national companies. We offer:

  • solutions to ad hoc issues
  • negotiation
  • structuring and restructuring
  • contractual arrangements
  • Dispute resolution (with HMRC, suppliers, customers etc)
  • full reviews and health checks
  • training of staff and management
  • assistance with international/cross-border supplies and purchases
  • due diligence
  • cost reduction exercises
  • income maximisation programmes
  • comprehensive land and property advice
  • advice on overseas indirect/GST matters both EC and non-EC
  • accounting and documentation advice

The VAT planning process – “The four As”

  • Ascertainment
  • Analysis
  • Alternatives
  • Action

More details of this approach here.

Where?

VAT, or its derivations applies in most countries around the world. So, the answer is probably “everywhere”. This is particularly relevant with cross-border transactions. A common issue is the “Place Of Supply” (POS) rules which dictate where a supply takes place and thus the VAT liability of it.

When?

Planning needs to be done in advance of transactions.  Once a contract has been entered into without thought for the VAT consequences, the damage may have already been done.

Where there is a one-off transaction (eg; sale of premises, sale of know-how, issue of shares), this is, by definition, something of which the business has little experience.  It is an occasion to assume that advice is needed, rather than to assume that the most obvious treatment is correct.

Since the impact of a change in the pattern of a business’ activities will continue down the years, rather than being restricted to a single occasion, it is doubly important to ensure that the correct treatment is identified from the outset.

Periodic reviews are a good time to look, not only at the future, but also at the past, to see whether developments in case law reveal past overpayments which may be reclaimed.  This is particularly important since repayments are subject to the four-year capping provisions.

The essential step is to have some means of becoming aware of changes and monitoring these with VAT in mind.  The means to be adopted are various and will depend on the size and type of the business.

What?

“Right tax, right time”. This means compliance with the relevant legislation but not paying any more VAT than is necessary. As one wag once said; “You must pay taxes. But there’s no law that says you have to leave a tip.”

Since VAT is a transaction-based tax, timing is often crucial and the objective is to legitimately defer payment to HMRC until the latest time possible, thus improving cash flow and retaining the use of VAT monies for as long as possible. The converse of this of course, is to obtain any repayments of VAT due from HMRC as soon as possible. We must also consider avoiding VAT representing an actual cost and taking advantage of any beneficial UK and EC legislation, determinations, guidance, case law and Business Briefs etc available.

VAT Planning objectives

  • improve cash flow
  • improve competitive position
  • legitimately reducing VAT payments or increasing repayments
  • minimise administration/management
  • avoid unnecessary tax or compliance costs
  • avoid penalties and interest

Who?

Marcus Ward Consultancy of course!

VAT: Changes to online advertising by charities

By   11 August 2020

In very welcome good news from the Charity Tax Group (CTG) the zero rating for charity advertising has been extended to previously standard rated supplies

Background

Certain (“traditional”) advertising services received by a charity have always been zero rated. However, the zero rating did not cover advertising that was ‘selected” or targeted”. HMRC has always been of the view that websites which use cookies which target certain potential donors fall within the exemption such that standard rating applied which commonly represented an additional cost to a charity.

Changes

However, the CTG has announced that lengthy ongoing discussions with HMRC have finally borne fruit. HMRC have indicated that they have “relaxed“ their position and now agree that supplies of digital advertising to a charity may qualify for zero rating, even if cookies are used. This is not a blanket policy, but it does broaden the availability of zero rating which will mean an absolute saving for most charities.

Exceptions

Advertising which is sent to a social media personal accounts, or where the recipient has paid a subscription for the site, continues to be standard rated.

Action

Charities should review their advertising activity for the last four years to establish whether they have a retrospective claim. Measures should also be put in place to ensure that VAT is not overpaid in the future. We can assist with making claims if required.

VAT: Whether a person “in business”. The Y4 Express Ltd case

By   7 August 2020

Latest from the courts

In the Y4 Express Ltd (Y4) First Tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) case the issue was whether an individual was in business such that he was entitled to be VAT registered.

Background

Y4 imported goods from China on behalf of UK customers. This entailed collecting the goods from the airport, storing them and then arranging delivery of them to the final customers. Y4 had an arrangement with Royal Mail (RM) for a discounted delivery rate. RM subsequently withdrew this discount resulting in Y4 incurring increased delivery costs. In order to mitigate this, Y4 put a structure in place using an individual (Mr Man) to contract with RM for the discount and letting Y4 use the account to take advantage of the reduced rates: RM invoiced Mr Man and Y4 would arrange payment from its own funds via direct debit. Y4 dealt with Mr Man’s VAT compliance and raised self-billing documents to itself on which it recovered input tax. It was reported that Mr Man considered this as a favour to a friend rather than as a business venture with a view to making a profit, and indeed, the charges made by RM were not marked up. Mr Man was not involved with the arrangement of deliveries of Y4 carried out by RM.

HMRC disallowed the input tax claimed as it considered that the individual was not in business, so no VAT was due on the charge made to Y4. This was on the basis that the individual was not carrying on an ‘economic activity’.

Decision

The FTT agreed with the respondent and upheld the decision to disallow Y4’s claim for input tax. This was on the basis that Mr Man was not in business so could not make supplies to Y4, which in turn meant that there was no input tax for Y4 to claim.

Commentary

The issue of whether an entity is “in business” goes back to the earliest days of VAT. I have considered the issue and recent case law here here here here and here.   HMRC relied heavily on the age-old (well, 1981) tests in the Lord Fisher case:

  • Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
  • Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
  • Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies?
  • Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
  • Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
  • Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

The judge found that the tests were not met by Mr Man and, even if they were, the evidence; the self-billing documents, were insufficient. It was also found that a penalty was due, although the quantum was reduced to reflect the cooperation of the taxpayer during the enquiries.

This appeal further demonstrates the ambiguity that often surrounds the definition of a business, and/or an economic activity (the EU legal definition). This is often an issue for charities and NFP bodies, but can extend to other areas such as in this case.

VAT: New government guide to imports and exports from/to the EU post Brexit

By   20 July 2020


On 13 July 2020 the Government published new guidance which sets out procedures for businesses moving goods between GB and the EU from 1 January 2021. These do not cover the movement of goods between GB and Northern Ireland which are covered by different rules.

On 1 January 2021 the transition period with the EU will end, and the UK will become a “third country” and as such, it will be required to operate a full, external border, in a manner similar to the UK’s current position with the Rest of World (ROW). This means that controls will be placed on the movement of goods between GB and the EU for the first time in decades.

The principles of the so-called “Core Model” will apply to all goods movements between GB and the EU, regardless of the mode of transport of the movement.

HMRC has stated that, to afford industry extra time to make necessary arrangements, it has taken the decision to introduce the new border controls in three stages up until 1 July 2021.

The guidance covers the core process of;

  • customs declarations
  • customs duty
  • import VAT
  • safety and security declarations (imports and exports)

It sets out actions that businesses should take now (especially in light of the coronavirus position), as they will be required regardless of the outcome of continuing negotiations (which, let’s face it, are likely to amount to nothing).

Some other changes will affect only specific goods movements, eg; foodstuffs which will include the need for special certifications, entering the country via specific locations, and undergoing
additional checks at the border.

If not already in place, businesses need to:

  • apply for a GB eori number
  • apply for a duty deferment Account
  • prepare to pay or account for VAT on imported goods
  • ensure drivers have correct International Driving Permits
  • consider commercial arrangements
  • consider incoterms
  • obtain the Commodity Code of goods
  • establish the customs value of goods
  • consider how customs declarations to HMRC systems will be made and the use of an Customs intermediary

The EC has published a new version of the Guidance on Customs on 14 July 2020.

This a comprehensive guide is absolutely essential reading for any business which imports or exports goods cross border (transactions known as acquisitions and dispatches from/to the EU pre-Brexit). The publication demonstrates that there will be considerably more red tape and delays which will not reduce in the future. The marketability of GB goods in the EU is unlikely to increase and, if there is no alternative to importing goods from the EU, the cost and time taken to purchase will grow.

Good luck everybody!

#VAT #Value-Added-Tax #marcus-ward #Marcus-ward-vat #VAT-business #VAT-place-of-supply #VAT-POS #business #VAT-supply #penalty #VAT-penalty #VAT-penalties #VATable #HMRC #EC #EU #European-Union #VAT-Law #VAT-legislation #tax #GST #SME #start-up #new-business #newbiz  #VAT-registration #tax-law #VAT-invoice #VAT-return #VAT-declaration #VAT-return #VAT-reporting #VAT-rules #EC-sales-list #VAT-cross-border #VAT-services #VAT-goods #VAT-international #International-tax #export #import #customs-duty #excise-duty #VAT-guide #indirect-tax #VAT-planning #tax-planning #VAT-compliance #tax-legislation #VAT-agent #VAT-principal #VAT-agent-principal #VAT-input-tax #VAT-output-tax #VAT-underdeclaration #VAT-overclaim #VAT-online #VAT-digital #VAT-distance-selling #VAT-HMRC #Brexit #covid19 #coronavirus

VAT: New EU Action Plan – The “Tax Package”

By   16 July 2020

The EU has announced on 15 July 2020 a new Action Plan for fair and simple taxation. The Tax Action Plan is a set of 25 initiatives the European Commission will implement between now and 2024 to make tax “fairer, simpler and more adapted to modern technologies”. Full details of the ‘Tax Package” here.

The main areas may be summarised as:

  • a single EU VAT registration to replace non-resident registrations to eliminate the need for non-resident VAT registrations. The registration number would enable a taxpayer to provide services and/or sell goods anywhere in the EU
  • plans to complement existing national and international programmes on co-operative compliance including agreements with third-countries (including the UK post Brexit)
  • reforms of VAT on Financial Services including measures for e-digital economy (Fintech) and financial and insurance outsourcing
  • proposals to change Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS) rules to simplify what is recognised as a complex and distortive VAT area
  • platform economy; a review of the role of marketplaces in collecting VAT on behalf of individuals on their platforms
  • simplification of the place of supply of passenger transport services (said to be for for greener taxation)
  • advances in e-payment facilities for VAT for small and medium sized businesses
  • extension of MOSS to all B2C sales across the EU (in addition to the proposals announced in respect of the 2021 extension for Distance Selling)
  • measures to combat cross-border VAT fraud including improved analysis of EU level data and a move to automated VAT data sharing
  • a reduction of the regulatory burden for e-commerce Distance Sales of goods subject to excise
  • consideration of the treatment of crypto-assets and e-money which is considered a threat to tax transparency and which poses “substantial risks for tax evasion”
  • proposals for reducing tax disputes and monitoring the effectiveness of the dispute resolution mechanisms in Member States

This list is not exhaustive and is a guide only.

The Commission says it aims “to lead the transition into a greener and more digital world that is compatible with the principles of our social market economy”. And that “Fair, efficient and sustainable taxation is central in delivering on those ambitions”. It added that this “will be even more important in the months and years ahead, as the EU and the global community seek to recover from the fallout of the COVID-19 crisis”.

Comment

How these intended changes impact the UK after Brexit remains to be seen, however, in an increasingly worldwide marketplace lead by technology, it is difficult to understand how the UK can live in isolation.

#VAT #Value-Added-Tax #marcus-ward #Marcus-ward-vat #VAT-business #VAT-place-of-supply #VAT-POS #business #VAT-supply #VAT-supply #penalty #VAT-penalty #VAT-penalties #VATable #HMRC #EC #EU #European-Union #VAT-Law #VAT-legislation #tax #GST #SME #start-up #new-business #newbiz  #VAT-registration #tax-law #VAT-invoice #VAT-return #VAT-declaration #VAT-return #VAT-reporting #VAT-rules #EC-sales-list #VAT-cross-border #VAT-services #VAT-goods #VAT-international #International-tax #export #import #customs-duty #excise-duty #VAT-fraud #VAT-guide #VAT-MOSS  #tax- digital #indirect-tax #tax-refund #VAT-refund #VAT-planning #tax-planning #VAT-compliance #tax-claim #VAT-claim #tax-legislation #VAT-financial-services #VAT-FS #VAT-agent #VAT-principal #VAT-agent-principal #VAT-input-tax #VAT-output-tax #VAT-underdeclaration #VAT-overclaim #VAT-online #VAT-digital #VAT-distance-selling #VAT-HMRC #Brexit

VAT Taxable Supply – Definition

By   3 July 2020

What is a taxable supply and who is a taxable person?

A VAT Back To Basics

Taxable supply

It is sometimes useful when considering a transaction to “go back to basics” for VAT purposes. There are certain tests to determine whether a supply is taxable, and these are set out below. Broadly, the tests establish whether UK VAT is payable on a sale and they determine whether an entity is “in business”, that is; carrying on an economic activity.

A transaction is within the scope of UK VAT if all four of the following conditions are satisfied:

  • It is a supply of goods or services.

There is a distinction between the two types of supply as different VAT treatments may apply.  Generally, everything that is not tangible goods is services. However, if no goods or services are actually provided, there is no supply.  Indeed, if there is no consideration for a supply, in most cases it is not a taxable supply.

  • It takes place in the UK.

There are quite complex tests to consider when analysing the “place of supply”, especially where services are concerned.  If the place of supply is outside the UK then usually no UK VAT is due, however, the supply may be subject to VAT in another country.

  • It is made by a taxable person.

A taxable person is any legal entity which is, or should be, registered for VAT in the UK.

  • It is made in the course or furtherance of any business carried on by that person

Business

The term “business” is only used in UK legislation, The Principal VAT Directive refers to “economic activity” rather than “business” and since UK domestic legislation must conform to the Directive both terms must be seen as having the same meaning.  Since the very first days of VAT there have been disagreements over what constitutes a “business”. I have only recently ended a dispute over this definition for a (as it turns out) very happy client.  The tests were set out as long ago as 1981 and may be summarised as follows:

  • Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
  • Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
  • Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made (bearing in mind that exempt supplies can also be business)?
  • Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
  • Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
  • Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

So, if these tests are passed a taxable supply exists. The next step is to establish which VAT rate applies. In an often quoted comment from the judge in the Morrison’s Academy Boarding Houses Association 1978 STC1 Court Of Session case “…In my opinion it will never be possible or desirable to define exhaustively ‘business’ ”. Which what it lacks in helpfulness, makes up for in candour.

There was something of a deviation from the Lord Fisher tests in the Longbridge Court of Appeal case, however, that appears to be a blip and HMRC seem to have reverted to Lord Fisher in subsequent hearings on the same topic. A bit of a: watch this space area of VAT.

Recent cases on business

Recent case law on this issue here and here and HMRC Internal guidance on the Lord Fisher tests here

Commentary

Tip: It is often easier to consider what isn’t a taxable supply to establish the correct VAT treatment.  Specific examples of situations which are not taxable supplies are; donations, certain free supplies of services, certain grants or funding, some compensation and some transactions which are specifically excluded from the tax by legislation, eg; transfers of going concerns (TOGC).

I think that it is often the case that the basic building blocks of the tax are overlooked, especially in complex situations and I find it helps to “go back to the first page” sometimes.

VAT: Brexit latest

By   23 June 2020

The European Commission (EC) has published an updated Notice to Stakeholders which covers the UK leaving the EU.

The original document which was published in 2018 has been amended to reflect the latest developments which mainly include the official Brexit on 1 February 2020 and the current transition period, which, as matters stand, will end on 31 December 2020. Until that date, EU law in its entirety applies to the UK

The Notice includes:

  • The legal position from 1 January 2021
  • VAT rules for cross-border services
  • The VAT General Rule
  • MOSS
  • Refunds of VAT
  • Separation provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement
  • The supply of other services
  • Refund requests relating to VAT paid before the end of the transition period

The Notice states that; “…during the transition period, the EU and the UK will negotiate an agreement on a new partnership, providing notably for a free trade area. However, it is not certain whether such an agreement will be concluded and will enter into force at the end of the transition period”. I think that this is likely to be a charitable conclusion!

The EC advises businesses:

  • when they are established in the EU, to familiarise themselves with the rules applicable to services supplied to and received from third countries (which the UK will become from 1 January 2021)
  • when they are established in the UK, to examine whether new liability rules will apply to them with regard to their services supplied in the EU
  • to take the necessary steps in respect of services covered by MOSS
  • consider the changes in the VAT refund request procedures

The Notice does not cover the supply of goods nor digital services themself.

General

After the end of the transition period, the EU rules on VAT for services no longer apply to, and in, the UK. This has, particular consequences for the treatment of taxable transactions in services and VAT.

Businesses need to understand the probable changes and make preparations for a No-Deal Brexit.

VAT: HMRC Toolkits updated

By   4 June 2020

HMRC has updated the following online toolkits for June 2020:

Input tax

Output tax and

Partial exemption

The Toolkits

These toolkits can be a useful resource. Although designed for agents and advisers, they can equally be of assistance to businesses when completing VAT returns. The contents are based on HMRC’s view of how tax law should be applied, so they should not be used as a substitute for proper professional advice. These toolkits set out areas of risk, provide general checklists, details of record keeping and links to HMRC information.  Many find that these toolkits are more user friendly than “traditional” HMRC guidance and they address many contentious areas.

Overview

For a helpful general guide to input tax and checklist please see here. And an introduction to partial exemption here.