Around 50% of businesses do not recover VAT incurred overseas and there is an estimated $5 billion not reclaimed each year.
Around 50% of businesses do not recover VAT incurred overseas and there is an estimated $5 billion not reclaimed each year.
Latest from the courts
Yet more on composite or separate supplies. As a background to the issue please see previous relevant cases here here here and here. This is the latest the seemingly endless and conflicting series of cases on whether certain supplies are multiple or single.
In the First-Tier Tribunal case (FTT) of Alan and Diane McFarland the appellants operated a ‘bed and breakfast’ for other people’s cattle.
The issue
The VAT issue was whether there were separate supplies:
Additionally, the appellant contended that the supply of animal food was a principal supply, and everything else, including the land, was ancillary.
HMRC took the view that there was a single taxable supply of ‘animal care’ and not separate supplies of exempt stabling and zero-rated feed. It also rejected the claim that the appellant had an exclusive right of occupation over any defined area, noting that there was no agreement conferring such a right with the consequence that this could not be an exempt supply. On the zero-rated animal foodstuffs point; HMRC concluded that the supplies do not qualify for zero-rating as the food provided formed part of the overall service of animal husbandry.
Legislation
Decision
The FTT found that there was a single standard rated supply of ‘looking after’ cattle. The supply made by the appellant fell squarely within the Levob (Levob Verzekeringen BV [C-41/04]) category, being so closely linked that they form, objectively, a single, indivisible economic supply, which it would be artificial to split. – HMRC notes on Levob here.
The supply was a fully integrated package of services directed towards the rearing and finishing of cattle. This included: daily mixing and provision of feed, management of water and housing, maintenance of handling facilities, statutory record‑keeping, and disease‑control obligations. These activities were inseparable in practice and indispensable for the operation of the recipient’s cattle‑finishing business. Neither the accommodation nor the feed, nor any other individual component, was offered or taken independently. There was a single price for the complete service. There was also a single invoice and a single description of the supply on the invoice. There was no indication on the invoice that both exempt and zero-rated services were being supplied.
The appellant provided a single composite service of animal rearing and management, to which all elements, including accommodation and feed, were merely constituent elements.
The Tribunal also dismissed the alternative argument of the that the supply of food was the principal supply, with all other elements, including accommodation and the wider activities being merely ancillary. The provision of food was not an aim in itself. The food could not sensibly be separated from the accommodation, handling, record-keeping and welfare-related functions that were also performed. It was, therefore, not the principal supply but an integrated component of the single composite supply.
The appeal was consequently dismissed.
Commentary
Yet another case on the perennial composite/single supply issue. This case was relatively straightforward and the outcome was no surprise. It is essential that businesses that potentially deal with agent/principal matters or make supplies at different VAT rates consider their position. Contracts, other documentation and the commercial reality need to be considered. We recommend that in such circumstances a review is carried out specifically to establish the correct VAT position .
Crisps – spot the difference: Doritos, Monster Munch, Wotsits and poppadums are standard rated, however Pringles, Skips and Twiglets, are VAT free.
You have a purchase invoice showing VAT. You are VAT registered, and you will use the goods or services purchased for your business… can you claim it?
Assuming a business is not partly exempt or not subject to a restriction of recovery of input tax due to non-business activities (and the claim is not for a motor car or business entertainment) the answer is usually yes.
However, HMRC is now, more than ever before, concerned with irregular, dishonest and inaccurate claims. It is an unfortunate fact that some people see making fraudulent claims as an “easy” way to illegally obtain money and, as is often the case, honest taxpayers are affected as a result of the (understandable) concerns of the authorities. Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC) or “carousel” fraud has received a lot of publicity over recent years with an estimate of £Billions of Treasury money being obtained by fraudsters. While this has been generally addressed, HMRC consider that there is still significant leakage of VAT as a consequence of dishonest claims. HMRC’s interest also extends to “innocent errors” which result in input tax being overclaimed.
In order to avoid unwanted attention from HMRC, what should a business be watching for when claiming credit for input tax? Broadly, I would counsel making “reasonable enquiries”. This means making basic checks in order to demonstrate to HMRC that a business has taken care to ensure that a claim is appropriate. This is more important in some transactions than others and most regular and straightforward transactions will not be in issue. Here are some pointers that I feel are important to a business:
Was there a supply?
This seems an obvious question, but even if a business holds apparently authentic documentation; if no supply was made, no claim is possible. Perhaps different parts of a business deal with checking the receipt of goods or services and processing documents. Perhaps a business has been the subject of fraud by a supplier. Perhaps the supply was to an individual rather than to the business. Perhaps a transaction was aborted after the documentation was issued. There may be many reasons for a supply not being made, especially when a third party is involved. For example, Co A contracts with Co B to supply goods directly to Co C. Invoices are issued by Co B to Co A and by Co A to Co C. It may not be clear to Co A whether the goods have been delivered, or it may be difficult to check. A lot of fraud depends on “correct” paperwork existing without any goods or services changing hands.
Is the documentation correct?
The VAT regulations set out a long list of details that a VAT invoice must show. Full details on invoicing here If any one of these required items is missing HMRC will disallow a claim. Beware of “suspicious” looking documents including manually amended invoices, unconvincing quality, unexpected names or addresses of a supplier, lack of narrative, “copied” logos or “clip-art” additions etc. One of the details required is obviously the VAT number of the supplier. VAT numbers can be checked for validity here
Additionally, imports of goods require different documentation to support a claim and this is a more complex procedure (which extends to checking whether supplies of goods have been made and physical access to them). A lot of fraud includes a cross border element so extra care should be taken in checking the validity of both the import and the documentation.
Ultimately, it is easy to create a convincing invoice and HMRC is aware of this.
Timing
It is important to claim input tax in the correct period. Even if a claim is a day out it may be disallowed and penalties levied. details of time of supply here
Is there VAT on a supply?
If a supplier charges VAT when they shouldn’t, eg; if a supply is zero rated or exempt or subject to the Transfer of A Going Concern rules (TOGC), it is not possible to reclaim this VAT even if the recipient holds an apparently “valid” invoice. HMRC will disallow such a claim and will look to levy penalties and interest. When in doubt; challenge the supplier’s treatment.
Place of supply
Only UK VAT may be claimed on a UK return, so it is important to check whether UK VAT is actually applicable to a supply. The place of supply (POS) rules are notoriously complex, especially for services, if UK VAT is shown on an invoice incorrectly, and is claimed by the recipient, HMRC will disallow the claim and look to levy a penalty, so enquiries should be made if there is any uncertainty. VAT incurred overseas can, in most cases be recovered, but this is via a different mechanism to a UK VAT return. Details on claiming VAT in other EC Member States here. (As with many things, this may change after Brexit).
One-off, unusual or new transactions
This is the time when most care should be taken, especially if the transaction is of high value. Perhaps it is a new supplier, or perhaps it is a property transaction – if a purchase is out of the ordinary for a business it creates additional exposure to mis-claiming VAT.
To whom is the supply made?
It is only the recipient of goods or services who may make a claim; regardless of; who pays or who invoices are issued to. Care is required with groups of companies and multiple VAT registrations eg; an individual may be registered as a sole proprietor as well as a part of a partnership or director of a limited company, As an illustration, a common error is in a situation where a report is provided to a bank (for example for financing requirements) and the business pays the reporting third party. Although it may be argued that the business pays for the report, and obtains a business benefit from it, the supply is to the bank in contractual terms and the business cannot recover the VAT on the services, in fact, in these circumstances, nobody is able to recover the VAT. Other areas of uncertainty are; restructuring, refinancing or acquisitions, especially where significant professional costs are involved.
e-invoicing
There are additional rules for electronically issued invoices. Details here
A business may issue invoices electronically where the authenticity of the origin, integrity of invoice data, and legibility of invoice content can all be ensured, and the customer agrees to receive invoices electronically.
A business is free to choose a method of ensuring authenticity, integrity, and legibility which suits its method of operation. e-invoicing provides additional opportunities for fraudsters, so a business needs to ensure that its processes are bulletproof.
HMRC’s approach
If a claim is significant, or unusual for the business’ trading pattern, it is likely that HMRC will carry out a “pre-credibility” inspection where they check to see if the claim is valid before they release the money. Another regular check is for HMRC to establish whether the supplier has declared the relevant output tax on the other side of the transaction (a so-called “reference”). Not unsurprisingly, they are not keen on making a repayment if, for whatever reason, the supplier has not paid over the output tax.
What should a business do?
In summary, it is prudent for a business to “protect itself” and raise queries if there is any doubt at all over making a claim. It also needs a robust procedure for processing invoices. If enquiries have been made, ensure that these are properly documented for inspection by HMRC as this is evidence which may be used to mitigate any potential penalties, even if a claim is an honest mistake. A review of procedures often flushes out errors and can lead to increased claims being made.
As always, we are happy to assist.
Anyone who has had even the slightest brush with VAT will know that it is a very complex tax. Now, multiply that complexity by the intricacy and occasionally arcane nature of property law and one may see that the outcome will be less than straightforward. I have produced a general guide and an article on residential property VAT Triggerpoints
I hope the following glossary will help with steering through some of the difficulties.
We strongly recommend that advice is obtained if any property transaction is being undertaken.
Details of our land and property services may be found here.
Private hire vehicles
Suppliers of private hire vehicle and taxi services will be excluded from the scope of the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) from 2 January 2026, except where these are supplied in conjunction with certain other travel services. The government also published a response to the Consultation on the VAT Treatment of Private Hire Vehicles and HMRC published Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2025): VAT Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme — supplies by private hire vehicle or taxi operators, which explains how to account for VAT as a private hire vehicle operator, a taxi operator, or business re-selling such supplies.
E-invoicing
VAT treatment of business donations of goods to charity
There will be a new VAT relief to be be introduced on 1 April 2026 for business donations of goods to charity for distribution to those in need or use in the delivery of their charitable services, ie; in addition to goods donated for sale. HMRC also published a response to the Consultation on the VAT treatment of business donations of goods to charity, and a policy paper, VAT relief for business donations on goods to charities. The relief will apply to goods valued up to £100 per item, with a higher £200 threshold for essential electrical items to help tackle digital poverty. Eligibility is strictly limited to registered charities, meaning community interest companies (CICs) and social enterprises are excluded unless they register as charities. This corrects an anomaly where there is no VAT liability when businesses dispose of goods to landfill, but may incur one when donating those same goods to charity.
Motability
From 1 July 2026, vehicles leased through the Motability Scheme will be subject to 20% VAT on top-up payments for more expensive vehicles which are made in addition to the transfer of eligible welfare payments for more expensive vehicles on the scheme. The standard rate of Insurance Premium Tax will apply to scheme insurance contracts: VAT and Insurance Premium Tax: change to reliefs for qualifying motor vehicle leasing schemes – GOV.UK There will be no changes to vehicles designed for, or substantially and permanently adapted for, wheelchair or stretcher users.
ATCS
The Government has confirmed that the ‘Advance Tax Certainty Service’ (ATCS) will launch in July 2026 and provide clearances on corporation tax, stamp taxes, VAT, PAYE and the construction industry scheme, where there is no existing statutory route to certainty.
Repayment interest and commercial restitution for VAT Autumn Budget 2025 representation by the Chartered Institute of Taxation.
This joint representation by the CIOT and the ATT covers the blatant unfairness of the amount of interest HMRC charges taxpayers when a business pays VAT late and the amount that HMRC pays a taxpayer when there are delays in making repayments to a business when they are due. Unsurprisingly, taxpayers have to pay a higher rate of interest; for reasons unknown!
Details here.
HMRC has recently updated its internal guidance: VIT33000 – How to treat input tax: late claims for input tax.
Input tax claims should be made in the accounting period in which the tax on the relevant goods or services became chargeable (the time of supply, or ‘tax point’). This is referred to as the ‘proper period’.
There are times when a claim cannot be made in the proper period. For example, the supporting evidence may not have been received. However, there are other reasons for claiming input tax in later periods, such as:
Recovery of input tax outside the proper period is subject to the Commissioners’ discretion under The VAT Regulations 1995, Regulation 29. HMRC will allow late claims to input tax in the above circumstances and in specific cases, provided HMRC is satisfied that allowing the late claims in a later period does not lead to overclaiming input tax or less tax being payable than if the input tax was claimed in the ‘proper period’.
HMRC will not exercise discretion to allow late claims of input tax on VAT returns in a later period where there is evidence of careless error or repeated late claims.
If tax is not deducted in the proper period due to an error, a business can recover the tax in a later period via The VAT Regulations 1995, Regulation 35 . More information on this subject and recent updates to the procedures here .
However, there are often uncertainties and disputes over precisely what tax may be claimed on various expenditure. To this end, HMRC has published a comprehensive list of items, sorted alphabetically, which should avoid a lot of potential disagreements on claims.
It should be noted that a claim for services can only be made for conversions (at the reduced rate of 5%) as any services in respect of a new build property should be zero rated.
What else can a housebuilder not claim for?
There is no claim available for:
If you would like assistance with making a claim, please contact us.
VAT basics
None of us are perfect, and any business can make mistakes with VAT despite all intentions to take reasonable care. So what are the most common errors? Here’s a list of pitfalls to avoid:
Wrong rate of output tax charged
Land and property transactions
Cross-border issues
Inter-company charges
Partial exemption
Business entertainment
Registration
VAT groups
Tax points (Time Of Supply)
Bad Debt Relief issues
Overseas issues
Claiming input tax without the correct documentation
Recovering irreclaimable input tax
Return errors
Business promotion schemes
Composite or separate supplies
Changes to a business
Fuel and motoring costs
Special schemes
One-off transactions
Non-business (NB) and charitable activities
Errors can lead to draconian penalties, and ignorance is not a defence.
A guide to VAT triggerpoints here .