Category Archives: EU

VAT: What is a taxable supply? – Definition

By   8 September 2026
0

VAT Basics

Taxable supply

It is sometimes useful when considering a transaction to “go back to basics” for VAT purposes. There are certain tests to determine whether a supply is taxable, and these are set out below. Broadly, the tests establish whether UK VAT is payable on a sale and they determine whether an entity is “in business”, that is; carrying on an economic activity.

A transaction is within the scope of UK VAT if all four of the following conditions are satisfied:

  • It is a supply of goods or services.

There is a distinction between the two types of supply as different VAT treatments may apply.  Generally, everything that is not tangible goods is services. However, if no goods or services are actually provided, there is no supply.  Indeed, if there is no consideration for a supply, in most cases it is not a taxable supply.

  • It takes place in the UK.

There are quite complex tests to consider when analysing the “place of supply”, especially where services are concerned.  If the place of supply is outside the UK then usually no UK VAT is due, however, the supply may be subject to VAT in another country.

  • It is made by a taxable person.

A taxable person is any legal entity which is, or should be, registered for VAT in the UK.

  • It is made in the course or furtherance of any business carried on by that person

Business

The term “business” is only used in UK legislation, The Principal VAT Directive refers to “economic activity” rather than “business” and since UK domestic legislation must (well historically) conform to the Directive both terms must be seen as having the same meaning.  Since the very first days of VAT there have been disagreements over what constitutes a “business”. I have only recently ended a dispute over this definition for a (as it turns out) very happy client. The tests were set out as long ago as 1981 and may be summarised as follows:

  • Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
  • Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
  • Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made (bearing in mind that exempt supplies can also be business)?
  • Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
  • Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
  • Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

So, if these tests are passed a taxable supply exists. The next step is to establish which VAT rate applies. In an often quoted comment from the judge in the Morrison’s Academy Boarding Houses Association 1978 STC1 Court Of Session case “…In my opinion it will never be possible or desirable to define exhaustively ‘business’ ”. Which what it lacks in helpfulness, makes up for in candour.

There was something of a deviation from the Lord Fisher tests in the Longbridge Court of Appeal case, however, that appears to be a blip and HMRC seem to have reverted to Lord Fisher in subsequent hearings on the same topic. A bit of a: watch this space area of VAT.

Recent cases on business

Recent case law on this issue here and here and HMRC Internal guidance on the Lord Fisher tests here

Commentary

Tip: It is often easier to consider what isn’t a taxable supply to establish the correct VAT treatment.  Specific examples of situations which are not taxable supplies are; donations, certain free supplies of services, certain grants or funding, some compensation and some transactions which are specifically excluded from the tax by legislation, eg; transfers of going concerns (TOGC).

I think that it is often the case that the basic building blocks of the tax are overlooked, especially in complex situations and I find it helps to “go back to the first page” sometimes.

VAT: Consignment and call-off stock

By   15 June 2026
1

VAT basics

Consignment, call-off stock, and sale or return goods

If a business is required to provide regular sales of goods to customers, a prudent business structure is to keep inventory in a warehouse near the customer, or which belongs to the customer. This is likely to reduce transport costs and provides quicker access to the goods thus reducing time in the supply chain.  There are specific VAT rules for businesses which hold stock in foreign countries. They stipulate when, and what VAT should be charged, and if a business needs to VAT register as a non-resident trader in another country in which it is warehousing its goods.

Below we consider what the terms mean, the differences and the VAT treatment applicable.

Differences 

There is often confusion over the terms; consignment and call-off stock, and they are sometimes used interchangeably. They are differentiated based on who controls access to, and use of, the goods. The difference determines the VAT requirements and compliance rules, so it is important to identify the actual arrangements a business has in place, or plan for the most beneficial outcome. Both of these measures involve the transfer of a business’ own goods – for the purposes of this article; cross-border. The transfer of goods within the same legal entity from one country to another is a deemed supply. This fact is sometimes missed, which can lead to problems.  The VAT rules differ from country to country and create legal uncertainty for businesses. 

In summary

  • Consignment stock

Consignment stocks are created when a business transfers its own goods to another Member State to create a stock over which it has control and from which it makes supplies. Typically, there are multiple potential customers for consignment stock.

Note: Goods sent to an overseas customer on sale or return are treated in the same way as consignment stocks.

  • Call-off stock

Call-off stock is the transfer of goods by a business from one Member State to another to create a stock of goods from which its customers can ‘call-off’ ie; use and pay for the goods as and when they require them.

Not call-off stock

Goods delivered to storage facilities operated by the supplier, rather than the customer, should be treated as consignment stocks (see above). If stocks of goods are dispatched by a supplier for call-off by more than one customer, this is also likely to be consignment stock.

VAT treatment

Consignment stock

There is an initial deemed supply of own goods to form the stock which takes place in the country from which the goods are originally shipped. This is usually VAT free as a dispatch and the usual documentary requirements apply.

The place of subsequent supplies of the goods, once a buyer has been found (change of ownership) is usually the country in which the stock is held.

Because the business is transferring its own goods “to itself” in another country it will be making an acquisition of goods in that country. The business is likely to be liable to register for VAT there (or appoint a fiscal representative in the country of arrival) and be responsible for import obligations in the other country. Output tax will also be due (at the rate of VAT applicable in the country in which the goods are located) on the sale to a third party.

Consignment stock – reporting requirements

If a UK VAT registered business transfers goods to another country to create a consignment stock it must complete box 6 on the VAT return reporting a value based on the cost of the goods – see HMRC Public Notice 725. 

Call-off stock

As the customer has control of the goods in storage, is aware of stock movements, and may take stock whenever he requires this does not generally require the seller to VAT register in the foreign country as a non-resident trader. Such sales are treated as a “regular’ export and the seller is required to show the customer’s VAT number etc on invoices and other documentation in order to treat it as VAT free in the usual way. The time of supply for these supplies is the date the goods are called off by the customer. 

Call-off stock – reporting requirements 

The supply of call-off stock from the UK to a VAT registered business in another country is VAT free (subject to the normal rules). Box 6 of the VAT return should be completed using a value based on the cost of the goods as above.

A VAT did you know?

By   30 March 2026
0

Around 50% of businesses do not recover VAT incurred overseas and there is an estimated $5 billion not reclaimed each year.

EU – Elimination of the threshold-based customs duty relief

By   23 February 2026
0
The EU will abolish the rule that Customs Duty does not apply to low value goods (less than €150) entering the EU
It will impose a fixed Customs Duty of €3 from 1 July 2026, until completion of the EU data hub which is expected to be on 1 July 2028.
When operational, the data hub will enable Customs Duty to apply to all imported goods, regardless of value, on an ad valorem basis.

Updated Guidance on Zero-Rated VAT for UK Exported Goods and Customs Processes

By   17 February 2026
0

HMRC has updated its guidance on applying zero-rated VAT to goods exported from the UK – VAT Notice 703.

The amendments reflect the latest legal requirements (the latest force of law) and customs processes as of 13 February 2026 and removes outdated customs terminology and guidance.

Summary

Goods exported from the UK can be zero‑rated provided they physically leave the UK and all HMRC conditions are met. Notice 703 sets out who can apply zero‑rating and the legal basis under the VAT Act 1994.

Conditions & time limits: Exporters must ensure goods are exported within specified time limits (generally within three months, but longer in some cases) and meet detailed conditions depending on whether the export is direct, indirect, or in special scenarios (eg; retailers, ships, aircraft).

Evidence & record‑keeping: Zero‑rating is only valid if acceptable proof of export is obtained and retained (such as customs declarations and commercial transport documents), with clear rules on records, customs systems, and compliance checks.

In order to zero-rate a supply, it is vitally important that exporters obtain the correct evidence that goods have physically left the UK and that all descriptions of the goods are accurate and satisfy HMRC requirements. There has been a significant amount of case law on export documentation (an example here) which illustrates that this is often an area of dispute.

Excise Duty: Your Christmas drink of choice, or perhaps not

By   9 December 2025
0
Christmas cheer
Advocate General (AG) Manuel Sanchez-Bordona has released his opinion in the Bene Factum case (The link is to Lithuanian, so you ‘may” need to translate…).

A curious matter and one which brings into focus the drinking habits of people across the EU. Now, as those who know me will be aware, I am not adverse to a good single malt, nor a decent claret, but I do wonder sometimes where people draw the line.

Background

It transpires that in Lithuania people who choose not to drink, or cannot afford, even the cheapest alcoholic items have turned to drinking perfume and mouthwash which contain isopropyl alcohol. This has a similar effect on the human body to what most people would regard as being from more usual beer, wine or spirits etc. Sounds delicious eh?

Issue

The issue was whether these products where subject to Excise Duty, or, as the appellant contended, they were duty free as cosmetic products.

Decision

The AG found that isopropyl alcohol is almost unpalatable to most people. The fact that Bene Factum held out, advertised and marketed to people to drink the products did not affect the fact that the main purpose of the goods was for their use as cosmetics and mouthwash. What must be considered is Excise Duty depends on an objective classification to determine whether it is intended for human consumption. This classification is not affected by the fact that Bene Factum actively encouraged people to drink these products rather than use them for cosmetic purposes.

Consequently, the goods where not subject to Excise Duty. Good news for Lithuanian alcohol connoisseurs! It remains to see if the court follows this opinion, in most cases they do, but one never knows.

Commentary 

If there is anybody out there who is getting ready for their Christmas party, looks at some cosmetic products and considers taking a swig, I make the following comments:

  • Probably best to stick supermarket own brand booze if money is an issue
  • I expect that these things taste absolutely terrible (although I have not sampled them)
  • I tend to stick to things that are to be applied externally doing just that with them without ingestion
  • If you can’t decide whether to gargle with something or drink it, I counsel spitting it out
  • If these goods come to the UK, at least they will be even cheaper being duty free. I am not sure that is a good thing.

VAT: New guidance on using postponed VAT accounting

By   2 December 2025
0

HMRC has published (on 28 November 2025) a collection of new guidance on postponed VAT accounting (PVA).

The guidance covers what a business needs to do if it is using PVA to account for import VAT on its VAT returns.

The publication brings together all PVA guidance, giving detailed information about:

 

Who can claim import VAT? The TSI Instruments case

By   5 November 2025
0

Latest from the courts

In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of TSI Instruments Limited the issue was whether the appellant could claim import VAT when it was not the owner of the imported goods. The amount of VAT at stake was circa £8.5 million.

Background

TSI Instruments (TSI) imported scientific equipment owned by its customers for repair. The main activity of TSI in the UK is the service, repair and calibration of TSI Group goods which had previously been sold to customers around the world.

TSI is named as the importer and paid the charges made by the shipping company for dealing with the declaration and customs clearance formalities on behalf of TSI as well as paying the import VAT which it claimed.

Contentions

HMRC refused to repay the claims on the basis that only the entity with title to the goods is able to deduct the import VAT.

The appellant argued there is no requirement in the legislation that the importer should be the owner of the goods in order for import VAT to be credited. TSI asserted that, as long as the goods are imported for the purposes of its taxable business and it bears the costs of the import, the import VAT can be credited as input tax.

Decision

The FTT ruled that TSI was not entitled to claim input VAT credit for import VAT paid on goods it did not own, and the appeal was dismissed. Via both EU and UK VAT law, the right to deduct import VAT is restricted to the actual owner of the goods or the entity which has the right to dispose of the goods as their owner (or where the cost or value of the goods is reflected in the price of specific output transactions or in the price of goods and services supplied in the course of their economic activities). Since TSI did not own the goods, and their value was not included in the repair service price, the FTT ruled against TSI.

Commentary

This position could have been avoided by planning being put in place. TSI could have used Inward Processing Relief or the owner of the goods could have been the importer.

Legislation/HMRC guidance

VIT13300 – Import VAT may only be claimed by the owner of the goods who would be entitled to reclaim the import VAT either in accordance with s24 VATA 1994 (if registered for VAT in the UK) or under part XXI of the VAT Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518) if they are not registered for VAT in the UK, provided they satisfy the legislative conditions. For further information see Notice 723A.

HMRC published Revenue and Customs Briefs 2 (2019) and Brief 15 (2020) which restated HMRC’s long-standing policy that it is the owner of the imported goods who is entitled to recover the import VAT under current UK legislation. These Briefs clarify, but do not change, HMRC’s policy.

VAT: Tax representatives and tax agents – what is the difference and why it is important

By   13 August 2025
0

VAT Basics

A Non-Established Taxable Person (NETP) may be required to appoint a tax representative or tax agent if they make taxable supplies in the UK. The term NETP is used to describe a person who is liable to be registered for VAT under the VAT ACT 1994 Schedule 1a. A NETP must register for VAT as soon as it makes its first taxable supply in the UK, or when it expects to make taxable supplies here within the next 30 days, that is; there is no turnover limit for a NETP.

A NETP is a business which has no place of belonging in the UK. So, what is the difference between a representative and agent, and does the NETP get a choice?

Tax representative

A representative maintains the NETP’s VAT records, submits VAT returns and accounts for UK VAT on behalf of the NETP and dels with communication with HMRC. A representative is jointly and severally liable for any VAT debts incurred by the NETP.

A NETP may only appoint one person at a time to act on its behalf, although a tax representative may act for more than one NETP.

Tax agent

 An agent carries out a similar role to a representative, however, the important difference is that HMRC cannot hold an agent responsible for any of NETP’s VAT debts. HMRC reserve the right not to deal with any particular agent. In some circumstances, if HMRC deem think it necessary, it will insist that a tax representative is appointed.

As long as HMRC has not directed (see below) a NETP to appoint a tax representative, it can appoint an agent to deal UK VAT affairs. Any arrangement made will be subject to whatever contractual agreement the NETP and agent decide. In some circumstances, if HMRC think it is necessary, it may still insist that a tax representative is appointed.

Distinction

The tax representative and the tax agent both act on behalf of a NETP. However, while the tax agent operates in the name of the NETP, the tax representative operates in its own name. Consequently, a tax representative is personally committed to pay HMRC and must be accredited beforehand. Contracts between representatives/agents need to be clear on this point and fees charged for this work should reflect the difference in responsibilities. Should the NETP fail to pay VAT, penalties and interest due, HMRC will collect these directly from the tax representative, so, in effect, the tax representative represents a monetary insurance for HMRC.

Direction

HMRC can direct some NETPs to appoint a tax representative who must be:

this is via VAT Act 1994, section 48(1).

HMRC may choose to require some form of security from a NETP whether or not there has been any direction regarding the appointment of a representative.

Not appointing a tax representative or agent

If a NETP does not wish to appoint a tax representative or agent, and HMRC has not directed them to appoint a tax representative, it must meet all its obligations under UK VAT law itself. This includes, inter alia:

Post Brexit

For UK businesses making overseas supplies:

Businesses established within the EU are exempted from appointing a tax representative in other Member-States (MS) as international tax assistance is compulsory within the EU (the local tax administration can request assistance from the country of establishment to recover the money directly from the business). Since Brexit, the UK became a third country, so this rule does not apply, and MS have the choice to make the appointment of a tax representative compulsory for UK businesses. Most MS have done so, the notable exception being Germany.

New guidance for registration of a NETP here.

VAT: Input tax incurred on the management of pension funds

By   1 July 2025
0

HMRC has published Revenue and Customs Brief 4 (2025), which provides information about changes to VAT deduction on costs incurred in respect of the management of pension funds.

The Brief explains a further policy change to VAT deduction on the management of pension funds – Employers can now claim all the VAT on investment costs linked to pension funds. HMRC will no longer view investment costs as being subject to dual-use. Instead, all the associated input tax incurred will be seen as the employer’s and deductible by the employer, subject to normal deduction rule

They no longer need to split the costs with pension trustees. This was (prior to the introduction of the changes on 18 June 2025) a dual-use apportionment.

This Brief is relevant to:

  • businesses and other taxable entities that provide pension funds for their employees
  • pension administration and asset management service providers
  • pension fund trustees and pension providers
  • tax advisers

Impact on partial exemption methods

Businesses may need to propose new partial exemption special method (PESM) to align their VAT recovery with the new policy.

Background

HMRC’s historic policy was that employers could recover input tax they incurred on costs relating to the administration of their occupational pension funds, but not those in relation to the asset management of investments made by the fund.

Subsequently, HMRC changed its policy to allow employers recovery of input tax incurred on investment costs, provided that the employer could show evidence that they contracted and paid for the investment services.

HMRC has said that it will publish additional guidance on the new policy by Autumn 2025.

Commentary

This is very welcome news for managers of pension funds. It provides clarity and simplification in accounting, plus, more significantly; a much-improved VAT position whereby irrecoverable input tax can be avoided.

The HMRC climbdown is originally a result of the Fiscale Eenheid PPG Holdings BV cs te Hoogezand (C-26/12) CJEU case which considered an employer’s entitlement to deduct VAT paid on services relating to the administration of defined benefit pension funds and the management of the assets of the fund..