Category Archives: Law

Reduced VAT rate for children’s meals, tickets, and family attractions

By Marcus Ward 26 May 2026

HMRC has announced a temporary reduced VAT rate of 5% will apply to the supply of children’s meals, tickets, and family attractions from 25 June 2026 to 1 September 2026 – Revenue and Customs Brief 5 (2026).

The brief explains a temporary reduced rate of VAT of 5% that will apply to:

certain supplies of children’s meals
children’s admission to theatres, cinemas, concerts, exhibitions and shows
all admission tickets to attractions suitable for families with children

Children’s meals

The reduced rate applies to the supply of children’s meals where both of the following conditions are met:

the meal is held out for sale only as a meal for children
the meal is supplied as part of catering services by a restaurant, café or similar establishment for consumption on the premises

Children’s theatre and cinema tickets

The reduced rate applies to children’s admission tickets to:

cinema screenings
theatrical performances, shows and concerts
exhibitions

A children’s ticket is one that is held out for sale only as a right of admission for a child, based on how it is marketed, priced and presented by the supplier.

Attractions

The reduced rate applies to charges made for a right of admission for any customers, regardless of age, to qualifying attractions that are suitable for families with children.

This includes admission to the following venues, unless that admission is already exempt from VAT (for example because it is supplied by a qualifying charity or other eligible body):

amusement parks and fairs, including water parks and theme parks (excluding pay-per-ride attractions)
circuses
adventure parks, including outdoor adventure centres
museums and similar cultural facilities, including planetariums, heritage sites, nature reserves and botanical gardens
zoos, aquariums, wildlife parks and farm visitor attractions
soft play centres, indoor bounce parks and indoor play facilities
observation attractions, including viewing platforms, towers and observation wheels

Only supplies of admission to these types of attractions fall within the scope of the relief.

This Brief will be relevant to businesses making consumer‑facing supplies to families with children during the school summer holidays. This includes, but is not limited to, the following types of organisations and their advisers:

restaurants, cafés and similar catering establishments
cinemas, theatres, exhibition and performance venues
operators of circuses, fairs, amusement parks, theme parks, adventure parks and water parks, zoos and other animal attractions, soft play centres, observation attractions and certain other family-focused attractions
museums and similar cultural attractions

VAT: Bad Debt Relief – A guide

By Marcus Ward 19 May 2026

VAT Basics

Bad Debt Relief (BDR)

We understand that businesses and consumers are likely to fall into default in increasing numbers if the economy continues to worsen and it is anticipated that the ability to settle of debts on time will significantly decrease. It is apparent that many debts will never be settled. Consequently, it appears timely to look at the available VAT relief.

The VAT position

VAT registered businesses usually account for tax on an accruals basis (but see CAS) and will therefore be required to account for output tax in the same VAT period as an invoice is issued to a customer. If that invoice is not paid and a bad debt arises this would mean that tax has been accounted for on a payment which has not been received.

Relief

Anything which can relieve the burden of VAT is to be welcomed, especially in such trying times. So VAT Bad Debt Relief (BDR) is a useful tool if a business is aware of it and understand when it may be claimed.

It is at the very least frustrating when a client does not pay, and in some cases this situation can lead to the end of a business. At least the VAT charged to the client should not become a cost to a supplier. The BDR mechanism goes some way to protect a business from payment defaulters.

There is a relief however, as normal with tax, there are specific conditions:

Conditions for claiming BDR

The supplier must have supplied goods or services for a consideration in money and must have accounted for and paid VAT on the supply. All or part of the consideration must have been written off as a bad debt by making the appropriate entry in the business’ records (this does not have to be a “formal” procedure and need not be notified to the customer). At least six months (but not more than four years and six months) must have elapsed since the later of the date of supply or the due date for payment.

Records required

Various records and evidence must be kept (for four years from the date of claim), in particular to identify:

the time and nature of the supply, the purchaser, and the consideration
the amount of VAT chargeable on the supply
the accounting period when this VAT was accounted for and paid to HMRC
any payment received for the supply
entries in the refund for bad debts account
the accounting period in which the claim is made

Procedure for claiming BDR

This part is straightforward: The claim is made by including the amount of the refund in Box 4 of the VAT Return for the period in which the debt becomes over six months old. The amount of BDR is either set-off against output tax due, or may create a refund position with HMRC.

Repayment of refund

Repayment of VAT refunded is required where payment is subsequently received or where the above conditions have not been complied with.

Adjustment of input tax for the debtor

Businesses are required to monitor the time they take to pay their suppliers and repay input tax claimed if they have not paid the supplier within six months. Subsequent payment of all or part of the debt will allow a corresponding reclaim of input tax. This is an easy assessment for HMRC to make at inspections, so businesses should make reviewing this matter this a regular exercise.

Finally, there is tax point planning available to defer a tax point until payment is received for providers of continuous supplies of services. Please see here

More on general VAT payment problems here.

VAT: Public EV charging update

By Marcus Ward 18 May 2026

Further to the Charge My Street Limited case, which we considered here HMRC has published Policy Paper Revenue and Customs Brief 4 (2026): VAT liability of supplies of electricity from public electric vehicle charge points.

This paper sets out the VAT treatment of supplies of electricity from public EV charging points.

HMRC’s position remains that charging electric vehicles at public charge points is standard rated for VAT.

Supplies of fuel and power to a domestic premises are subject to the reduced rate of VAT at 5%. HMRC’s long-standing policy is that electric vehicle charge points located in public areas do not qualify as domestic premises and the standard rate of VAT applies to the supply of electricity at these locations.

The First-tier Tribunal found in favour of Charge My Street Limited. It concluded that Note 5(g) of Item 1 of Group 1 of Schedule 7A to the VAT Act 1994 covers supplies of electricity to an identified person at any identifiable premises, provided the total supplied does not exceed 1,000 kWh in a calendar month. The FTT clarified there is no additional requirement for the premises to be owned or controlled by the person receiving the supply, nor do the premises need to be buildings. This means locations such as public car parks may be included. The FTT decided that supplies of EV charging at public charging stations fell within the de minimis limit for supplies of electricity, and so were deemed to be for domestic use and, accordingly, subject to the reduced rate.

HMRC has applied for permission to appeal the First-tier Tribunal’s decision.

A VAT Did you know?

By Marcus Ward 29 April 2026

All alcoholic drinks are always standard rated. Alcohol-free beer and wines are similarly subject to VAT.

The penalty regime…the dark side of VAT

By Marcus Ward 29 April 2026

VAT Penalties

I have made a lot of references to penalties in other articles over the years. So I thought it would be a good idea to have a closer look; what are they, when are they levied, rights of appeal, and importantly how much could they cost if a business gets it wrong?

Overview

Broadly, a penalty is levied if the incorrect amount of VAT is declared, either by understating output tax due, or overclaiming input tax, or accepting an assessment which is known to be too low.

Amount of penalty

HMRC detail three categories of inaccuracy. These are significant, as each has its own range of penalty percentages. If an error is found to fall within a lower band, then a lower penalty rate will apply. Where the taxpayer has taken ‘reasonable care,’ even though an error has been made, then no penalty will apply.

An error, when reasonable care not taken: 30%;
An error which is deliberate, but not concealed: 70%;
An error, which is deliberate and concealed: 100%.

Reasonable care

There is no definition of ‘reasonable care’. However, HMRC have said that they would not expect the same level of knowledge or expertise from a self-employed person, as from a large multi-national.

HMRC expect that, where an issue is unclear, advice is sought, and a record maintained of that advice. They also expect that, where an error is made, it is adjusted, and HMRC notified promptly. They have specifically stated that merely to adjust a return will not constitute a full disclosure of an error. Therefore, a penalty may still be applicable.

Notification

Further, where there is an ‘unprompted disclosure’ of the error, HMRC have power to reduce the penalty further. This measure is designed to encourage businesses to review their own VAT returns.

A disclosure is unprompted if it is made at a time when a person had no reason to believe that HMRC have discovered or are about to discover the inaccuracy. The disclosure will be treated as unprompted even if at the time it is made, the full extent of the error is not known, as long as fuller details are provided within a reasonable time.

What the penalty is based on

The amount of the penalty is calculated by applying the appropriate penalty rate (above) to the ‘Potential Lost Revenue’ or PLR. This is essentially the additional amount of VAT due or payable, as a result of the inaccuracy, or the failure to notify an under-assessment. Special rules apply where there are a number of errors, and they fall into different penalty bands.

Defending a penalty

The percentage penalty may be reduced by a range of ‘defences:’

– Telling; this includes admitting the document was inaccurate, or that there was an under-assessment, disclosing the inaccuracy in full, and explaining how and why the inaccuracies arose;

– Helping; this includes giving reasonable help in quantifying the inaccuracy, giving positive assistance rather than passive acceptance, actively engaging in work required to quantify the inaccuracy, and volunteering any relevant information;

– Giving Access; this includes providing documents, granting requests for information, allowing access to records and other documents.

HMRC have included a provision whereby a penalty can be suspended for up to two years. This will occur for a careless inaccuracy, not a deliberate inaccuracy. HMRC will consider suspension of a penalty where, given the imposition of certain conditions, the business will improve its accuracy. The aim is to improve future compliance and encourage businesses which genuinely seek to fulfil their obligations.

Appealing a penalty

HMRC have an internal reconsideration procedure, where a business should apply to in the first instance. If the outcome is not satisfactory, the business can pursue an appeal to the First Tier Tribunal. A business can appeal on the grounds of; whether a penalty is applicable, the amount of the penalty, a decision not to suspend a penalty, and the conditions for suspension.

The normal time limit for penalties to four years. Additionally, where there is deliberate action to evade VAT, a 20 year limit applies. In particular, this applies to a loss of VAT which arises as a result of a deliberate inaccuracy in a document submitted by that person.

These are just the penalties for making “errors” on VAT returns. HMRC have plenty more for anything from late registration to issuing the wrong paperwork.

Even darker

There are even more severe penalties for deliberate acts, including significant terms of imprisonment. That is the subject of another article.

Assistance

My advice is always to check on all aspects of a penalty and seek assistance for grounds to challenge a decision to levy a penalty. We have a very high success rate in defending businesses against inappropriate penalties. It is always worth running a penalty past us.

VAT: Crowdfunding – What is taxable?

By Marcus Ward 9 April 2026

What is crowdfunding?

Crowdfunding is the practice of funding a project or venture by raising many small amounts of money from a large number of people, typically via the internet on specifically designed platforms and is an alternative to traditional ways of raising finance. The model is usually based on three parties: the project initiator who proposes the idea or project to be funded, individuals or groups who support the idea, and a moderating organisation (the “platform”) that brings the parties together to launch the idea.

Crowdfunding is a major, growing source of funding for startups, charities, and creative projects, with the global market predicted to grow annually by around 15% from 2026 to 2033 with platforms like Kickstarter, Seedrs, Crowdcube, and GoFundMe being major players.

VAT Treatment

The VAT treatment of supplies that might potentially be made is no different to similar financing arrangements, for example; sponsorship, donations and investments made through more traditional routes. Whether a recipient of crowdfunding is liable to charge and pay VAT depends on the facts in each case.

Examples

Donations

where nothing is given in return for the funding, it will be treated as a donation and not liable to VAT – the position is the same where all that the funder receives is a bare acknowledgement, such as a mention in a programme or something similar

Goods and/or services

where the funder receives goods or services that have a real value associated with them, for example; clothing, tickets, DVDs, film viewings, output tax will be due

Combination

where the payment is for a combination of the two examples above, if it is clear that the donation element is optional then that part of the sponsorship can be treated as a non-taxable donation and the supply will be taxable. If a donation element cannot be carved out, it is likely that all of the payment will be considered as VATable

Investment

where the funding takes the form of an investment where the funder is entitled to a financial return such as; interest, dividends or profit share, any payment due to the funder is unlikely to be liable to output tax, The reason why most of these arrangements are outside the scope of VAT is that the provision of capital in a business venture is not seen as a supply for VAT purposes

Royalties

if the arrangement is that the funder receives royalties based on a supply of intellectual property or some other similar benefit the payment is likely to be consideration for a taxable supply and output tax will be due

Loan-based

Individuals lend money to businesses or people for interest payments. The making of any advance or the granting of any credit is exempt.

VAT registration

If income from the sources above which are deemed to be subject to VAT exceeds the VAT registration limit (currently £90,000 in any twelve-month period) the person, in whichever legal identity, such as; individual, company, partnership, Trust etc will be liable to register for VAT. If income is below this limit, it will be possible, but not mandatory to VAT register. The benefits of voluntary registration here.

Input tax recovery

If VAT registered, any input tax incurred on costs relating to crowdfunding is usually recoverable (see here for exceptions). However, if the costs relate to donations or some types of investment then input tax claims are specifically blocked as they would relate to non-business activities. If exempt supplies are made, attributable input tax is generally blocked unless it is de minimis.

Commentary

There can be difficulties in establishing the tax liability of crowdfunding and in a broader sense “sponsorship” in general. However, experience insists that the biggest issue is initially identifying that there may be a VAT issue at all. If you, or your clients are involved in crowdfunding, or have sponsors, it would be prudent to review the VAT treatment of the activities.

VAT: HMRC clarifies the Domestic Reverse Charge does not apply to EV charging

By Marcus Ward 17 March 2026

HMRC has updated its Notice 735 which explains why the Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC) does not apply to electric vehicles (EVs).

The legislation for the DRC for electricity was designed to exclude supplies of electricity made under supply licences (supply electricity). It also excludes resale supplies of electricity made between the person holding the supply licence and the person making the supply to the consumer of the electricity (the vehicle user).

This means that the reverse charge does not apply to the supply of electricity at a charging point for EVs. This is because either the vehicle user is not VAT registered, or because it is not a wholesale supply. This applies whether or not the electricity is supplied at a public charging point.

Wholesale has an ordinary meaning where the supply is business to business and there is little or no consumption of the supply. EV charging does not fall within this definition.

For the latest case law on public EV charging see here.

VAT: New, important HMRC guidance for zero-rating exports

By Marcus Ward 10 March 2026

HMRC has updated its Notice 703 which explains the conditions for VAT zero-rating exports of goods. It is crucial for a business to have the correct documentation to evidence goods physically moving out of the UK.

Information on official evidence has been updated in paragraphs 6.2, 7.1 and 7.2 as follows:

Para 6.2 Official evidence

Official evidence is an export declaration for the goods submitted to the Customs Declaration Service which has generated a departure confirmation. You will need the Movement Reference Number (MRN) or Declaration Unique Consignment Reference (DUCR) of the declaration.

Para 7.1 Air and sea freight
If you are using commercial transport documents as proof of export for goods exported outside the UK or EU by:
- air — you must obtain and retain an authenticated basic master airway bill or house air waybill endorsed with the flight prefix and number, and the date and place of departure
- sea — you must keep one of the copies of the bill of lading or sea waybill along with a note of the export declaration Movement Reference Number (MRN) or Declaration Unique Consignment Reference (DUCR) or, where a shipping company does not issue these, a certificate of shipment (certifying actual shipment) along with a note of the export MRN or DUCR, given by a responsible official of that company.

7.2 Road freight

The international consignment note provides evidence of the identity of the contracting parties when goods are transferred by road. It is in 3 parts and is completed and signed by the sender of the goods, the carrier and the person receiving the goods. If the international consignment note is used as part of the evidence, it is important that the information is complete and all the details legible. Where the overseas customer arranges for the goods to be collected ex-works the international consignment note alone is not conclusive evidence that the goods in question have left the UK. Read paragraph 6.6 for additional evidence required when making an indirect export.

Where goods leave through a port using the Goods Vehicle Movement Service, you should retain the Goods Movement Reference of the vehicle for that journey.

Failure to produce the appropriate and accurate evidence will result in output tax being due on the relevant goods.

VAT: Composite or separate supplies – The A & D McFarlane case

By Marcus Ward 10 March 2026

Latest from the courts

Yet more on composite or separate supplies. As a background to the issue please see previous relevant cases here here here and here. This is the latest the seemingly endless and conflicting series of cases on whether certain supplies are multiple or single.

In the First-Tier Tribunal case (FTT) of Alan and Diane McFarland the appellants operated a ‘bed and breakfast’ for other people’s cattle.

The issue

The VAT issue was whether there were separate supplies:

zero-rated supply of animal food
exempt supply of land.

Additionally, the appellant contended that the supply of animal food was a principal supply, and everything else, including the land, was ancillary.

HMRC took the view that there was a single taxable supply of ‘animal care’ and not separate supplies of exempt stabling and zero-rated feed. It also rejected the claim that the appellant had an exclusive right of occupation over any defined area, noting that there was no agreement conferring such a right with the consequence that this could not be an exempt supply. On the zero-rated animal foodstuffs point; HMRC concluded that the supplies do not qualify for zero-rating as the food provided formed part of the overall service of animal husbandry.

Legislation

Exemption: right over land or any licence to occupy land – The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, Group 1, item 1
Zero-rating: animal feeding stuffs – The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8, Group 1, Item 2.

Decision

The FTT found that there was a single standard rated supply of ‘looking after’ cattle. The supply made by the appellant fell squarely within the Levob (Levob Verzekeringen BV [C-41/04]) category, being so closely linked that they form, objectively, a single, indivisible economic supply, which it would be artificial to split. – HMRC notes on Levob here.

The supply was a fully integrated package of services directed towards the rearing and finishing of cattle. This included: daily mixing and provision of feed, management of water and housing, maintenance of handling facilities, statutory record‑keeping, and disease‑control obligations. These activities were inseparable in practice and indispensable for the operation of the recipient’s cattle‑finishing business. Neither the accommodation nor the feed, nor any other individual component, was offered or taken independently. There was a single price for the complete service. There was also a single invoice and a single description of the supply on the invoice. There was no indication on the invoice that both exempt and zero-rated services were being supplied.

The appellant provided a single composite service of animal rearing and management, to which all elements, including accommodation and feed, were merely constituent elements.

The Tribunal also dismissed the alternative argument of the that the supply of food was the principal supply, with all other elements, including accommodation and the wider activities being merely ancillary. The provision of food was not an aim in itself. The food could not sensibly be separated from the accommodation, handling, record-keeping and welfare-related functions that were also performed. It was, therefore, not the principal supply but an integrated component of the single composite supply.

The appeal was consequently dismissed.

Commentary

Yet another case on the perennial composite/single supply issue. This case was relatively straightforward and the outcome was no surprise. It is essential that businesses that potentially deal with agent/principal matters or make supplies at different VAT rates consider their position. Contracts, other documentation and the commercial reality need to be considered. We recommend that in such circumstances a review is carried out specifically to establish the correct VAT position .

Charging EVs at public stations is at 5% VAT – The Charge My Street case

By Marcus Ward 10 March 2026

Latest from the courts

Reduced VAT rate for public EV charging

In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Charge My Street Limited (CMS) the issue was whether the supply of electric vehicle (EV) charging in public places qualified for the reduced rate of VAT – 5%.

The appellant contended that the reduced rate applied to its supplies because they were provided at a premises and were below the de minimis – 1000 kilowatt hours (kWh) a month applicable to domestic use of electricity.

HMRC formed the view that these supplies were standard rated at 20% on the basis that what was being provided was not for ‘domestic use’. Furthermore, the de minimis was breached because the supply should be calculated by reference only to the period during which the electricity was actually being provided, rather than to a specific person at any premises in a month.

Legislation

The relevant legislation is found at The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 7A, Group 1, Item 1, Note 5(g),

Decision

The FTT found that ‘premises’ for this purpose did not require any concept of legal ownership by the recipient of the electricity, nor was it confined to buildings, but could include defined public spaces, such as car parks. The judge also accepted CMS’s argument that the de minimis limit is measured in terms of how much electricity is provided by a supplier to a person at any premises in the relevant month. It was accepted that public EV charging would always be under the 1000 kWh limit.

The FTT allowed appellant’s appeal in principle.