Category Archives: HMRC Publications

VAT: Bad Debt Relief – The Regency UT case

By Marcus Ward 3 February 2021

Bad Debt Relief (BDR) is a mechanism which goes some way to protect a business from payment defaulters. Under the normal rules of VAT, a supplier is required to account for output tax, even if the supply has not been paid for (however, the use of cash accounting or certain retail schemes removes the problem of VAT on bad debts from the supplier).

The specific relief for unpaid VAT is via the BDR scheme.

Background

In the Regency Factors plc Upper tribunal (UT) case the issue was whether the appellant met the conditions in The VAT General Regulations 1995, Reg 168 for claiming BDR via The VAT Act 1994, section 36.

Regency provides a factoring service to its clients for which it is paid a fee. VAT invoices for those fees were issued to clients when the invoices which are being factored are assigned to Regency for collection.

Regency appealed against a decision of the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) in which it dismissed Regency’s appeal against VAT assessments made by HMRC to withdraw BDR which Regency had claimed in its VAT returns.

Regency contended that it is entitled to BDR for the VAT element on the fees that were unpaid by its clients. HMRC contended that Regency is not entitled to BDR because the consideration for the supply was received by Regency and there was no bad debt to write off.

Decision

The UT deliberated on when consideration is received for factoring services and accepted that some debts were bad. However, it decided that Regency had not maintained a bad debt account as required for Reg 168. Consequently, HMRC was correct in refusing to pay the BDR claim.

Commentary

As always with VAT, it is important to keep complete and accurate records, as this case demonstrates. Reg 168 states (where relevant):

(2) Save as the Commissioners may otherwise allow, the record referred to in paragraph (1) above shall consist of the following information in respect of each claim made

(a) in respect of each relevant supply for that claim—

(i) the amount of VAT chargeable,

(ii) the prescribed accounting period in which the VAT chargeable was accounted for and paid to the Commissioners,

(iii) the date and number of any invoice issued in relation thereto or, where there is no such invoice, such information as is necessary to identify the time, nature and purchaser thereof, and

(iv) any payment received therefore,

(b) the outstanding amount to which the claim relates,

(d) the prescribed accounting period in which the claim was made.

(3) Any records created in pursuance of this regulation shall be kept in a single account to be known as the “refunds for bad debts account”.

VAT: New gov.uk EORI tool

By Marcus Ward 21 January 2021

Gov.uk has provided a new tool to check a business’ EORI number. (This used to be an EC resource now not available due to Brexit).

A guide to EORI here

A business may need to demonstrate to HMRC that it has carried out proper due diligence in certain cases.

Contact

If you have queries, or would like to obtain specific EORI advice, contact the HMRC EORI team using the online form

Access

Who has access to an EORI number?

The general public can access limited data, When a business is notified of its EORI number, it will be asked whether it objects to this data being published on the site.

VAT: New HMRC guidance for using international post and merchandise in baggage

By Marcus Ward 19 January 2021

HMRC has published two new sets of guidance for international post users and importing merchandise in baggage. The changes are mainly due to Brexit.

International post users

HMRC has published new guidance for international post users.

The notice explains what happens when a business imports or exports goods by post through Royal Mail or Parcelforce Worldwide.

The arrangements set out in the notice do not apply when a full declaration on a single administrative document (SAD – Form C88) is required.

The information about sending a package overseas has been updated. This relates to the new need to compete a customs declaration for goods sent to the EU.

Bringing commercial goods into Great Britain in baggage

The guidance covers commercial goods (also known as Merchandise in Baggage) which will be used, or sold by a business, where: 

a commercial transport operator does not carry them for a business
a person has travelled to GB carrying goods either:
- in accompanied baggage
- in a small vehicle that can carry up to no more than 9 people and weighing 3.5 tonnes or less

A person must declare all commercial goods. There is no duty-free allowance for goods brought into GB to sell or use in a business.

My guide to importing and exporting post Brexit here.

VAT: Unjust enrichment. The Deluxe case

By Marcus Ward 13 January 2021

Latest from the courts

In the Deluxe Property Holdings Limited High Court case (Deluxe) the issue was whether a VAT claim needed to be passed back to the supplier after a correction – whether the unjust enrichment applied.

Background

Deluxe employed SCL Construction Limited (SCL) to carry out building works. SCL raised invoices in respect of the construction of student accommodation at 20%. It was, however, common ground that the works were in fact zero-rated. SCL recovered the overcharged VAT from HMRC via a VAT Act 1994 Section 80 claim. SCL undertook to repay the amount of VAT to Deluxe via section 10 of VAT Notice 700/45. Without such written reimbursement undertaking, HMRC would have been entitled to refuse the claim. SCL did not make the payment to Deluxe.

Issue

The issue between the parties was whether:

SCL holds the accounting credit obtained from HMRC on trust for Deluxe, or;
the claim is only in debt, in which case SCL sought to set-off such the claim against other monies that it alleges are owed by Deluxe

Decision

The court ruled that SCL had undertaken to reimburse its customer all of the amount credited by HMRC without any deduction, for whatever purpose. Further, SCL had undertaken that it could not use the credit for any other purpose. It was a payment made by HMRC for the sole and express purpose of allowing SCL to reimburse the mistakenly charged VAT to Deluxe and was clearly intended to restrict SCL’s freedom of disposal so that the credit was to be exclusively used for the stated purpose without set-off.

Although SCL gave its undertaking to HMRC rather than to Deluxe to pass on the money, it held the repayment on trust for Deluxe and gave rise to a Quistclose Trust*

Additionally, a constructive trust arose because it would be unacceptable for SCL to derive a benefit of the VAT repayment.

The court found that SCL has acted in breach of trust and is liable as trustee to restore the trust fund and transfer to Deluxe the balance of the trust property without offsetting it against amounts that it claimed it was owed by Deluxe.

Commentary

This is a logical and expected decision and the reasoning is helpful for similar disputes.

* A trust may arise where one person, A, advances money to another, B, on the understanding that B is not to have the free disposal of the money and that it may only be applied for the purpose stated by A. The effect of the trust is to reserve in A the beneficial interest in the money, so providing him with some proprietary security for his advance.

VAT: Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) – changes ahead?

By Marcus Ward 12 January 2021

TOMS is complex, time consuming, potentially costly and a major headache for tour operators. It does aim to simplify VAT accounting as it avoids businesses having to VAT register in every EU Member State in which it provides services.

But, are there changes ahead? The European Commission has published a Factual summary report which looks at TOMS. The consultation was to gather evidence in order to evaluate the scheme in terms of ;

does it remain effective
to what extent existing rules remain relevant and aligned with stakeholders’ needs
identification of potential distortions of competition
the regulatory costs and benefits for businesses taxed under the scheme

Since Brexit, HMRC have stated that TOMS still applies in the UK, but supplies in the EU which were previously VATable were now zero rated. The result is that only supplies in the UK are subject to VAT on the margin achieved. The future is unclear however. There is no longer a level playing field between the UK and other EU countries as UK operators’ have an advantage. The potential outcomes(to my mind) are:

the position remains the same
UK operators will be required to VAT register in every Member State it sells holidays to (or at least some)
the above report will address the issues (but will not be binding on the UK

The rules of TOMS are not currently fully harmonised and there are variations in the way EU Member States treat non-EU travel companies (such as the UK now). There are also differences in the services which are, and are not, covered by TOMS. Watch this space…

A VAT Did you know?

By Marcus Ward 29 December 2020

Food for wild birds is zero rated, while food for caged birds is at 20%.

VAT stats

By Marcus Ward 17 December 2020

HMRC has published the official VAT statistics for 2019/20

The headlines are:

Total VAT receipts in 2019-20 decreased by 1.5% from the previous financial year. There was a downward impact on receipts from the VAT deferral measure which took effect from 20 March 2020.
The Wholesale and Retail sector continued to be the largest contributor to net home VAT liabilities.
62% of total net home VAT declared was paid by traders with an annual turnover greater than £10 million.
Incorporated companies accounted for the largest share of the VAT population and annual taxable turnover. This group accounted for 72% of traders, and 91% of annual taxable turnover in 2019-20.
Sole proprietors were the second largest group in terms of VAT population; this group accounted for 16% of VAT traders. However, the annual taxable turnover declared by this group only accounted for 1% of the total for 2019-20.
The Professional, Scientific and technical activities sector increased by £860 million (5%), the largest year-on-year change.
The Real Estate Activities sector decreased by £530 million (12%) and the Construction sector decreased by £160 million (3%) year-on-year, although both sectors remain in the top ten sectors in terms of contribution to VAT liabilities.
46.7% of traders declared annual turnover below the VAT registration threshold.
More than half of net home VAT payments are accounted for by traders in the top 0.5% in 2019-20.

VAT – How to apply for a non-statutory clearance

By Marcus Ward 16 December 2020

One would think that it would be a relatively straightforward matter to write to HMRC to obtain a ruling (non-stat clearance) on a matter. Surely a taxpayer ought to be able to set out the issue, describe the transaction, provide a tax analysis and ask HMRC whether they consider the proposed VAT treatment appropriate. Well, of course, it is not as simple as that (this is VAT after all).

So, what are the issues and what hurdles must be cleared before HMRC engage with a written query?

Checklist

First, there is a checklist which a business must consider and include in a non-stat clearance. Inter alia, this list includes:

Information about the transaction(s)
The reasons why the business is undertaking the transaction
The relevant facts about the transaction, set out chronologically as transaction steps,
The answer sought – set out your view of the tax consequences of the transaction
Any details that are contingent, eg; on future events or the consent of others
Information about commercial background
Explain the significance of the tax result in achieving the desired outcome
Explain why you chose this form of transaction over another that could achieve the same commercial result, where you have considered alternative forms
Information about legal points
Outline the specific legislation at issue
Why you believe the application of the legislation is open to possible different interpretations, summary of those different interpretations, and why the tax consequences are uncertain, including reference to our published guidance or to case law
Any legal advice you have already received, and you are content to disclose
Details of how you intend to use the clearance, such as for public documents
Information about the disclosure of a tax avoidance scheme that covers all or part of the transaction

Failure to address any items on the checklist usually means no determination will be forthcoming.

An applicant must also set out what HMRC guidance (including internal guidance) legislation, case law and other information has been considered. We find it helpful to reproduce the full checklist (as HMRC advise) and provide a comprehensive response to each point in order to avoid a straightforward refusal to respond.

Genuine uncertainty

One of the main reasons HMRC refuses to provide a non-stat clearance is that it considers that there is no genuine uncertainty; in other words, “go and look at the guidance”. This is very unhelpful after time and effort, and fees cost has gone into the application. The fact that an application is required to set out what guidance etc has been considered, and why it is ambiguous in the relevant circumstances does not seem to carry very much weight. I find it is unhelpful to say, “if it wasn’t uncertain, we wouldn’t be writing to you”! We recommend that a full explanation of the genuine uncertainty is provided to forestall such a HMRC refusal to reply.

Chances

Experience insists that it is difficult to obtain a non-stat clearance which is of any value. Quite often, HMRC will reply saying that their letter is not a non-stat clearance, but then go on to address (at least) some of the issues. This sometimes provides a degree of comfort. An approach that I sometimes adopt is to say, “we believe this to be the correct VAT treatment, and one we will apply to the transaction unless you advise otherwise with reasons”. This sometimes creates a reaction.

HMRC guidance

Details of obtaining a non-stat clearance here.

Address

I find that applications are looked at quicker if they are emailed: nonstatutoryclearanceteam.hmrc@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk. However, there is a 2mb size limit which is often unhelpful. If emailing, an applicant should state that you confirm that you understand and accept the risks involved in using email (otherwise this can cause delays).

Postal address

HM Revenue & Customs, Non-Statutory Clearance Team, S0563. 5th Floor, Saxon House, 1 Causeway Lane, Leicester , LE1 4AA

What HMRC will not rule on

Incomplete information
When there is no genuine uncertainty
When they consider it planning advice, or approval of a planning arrangements
HMRC believes that the intention is to avoid tax
There is a statutory clearance applicable to the transaction
Whether activities constitute a business
Whether a transaction represents a Transfer Of a Going Concern (TOGC).

Reliance

Even if a business does obtain a determination, is it possible to rely on it? The answer is no (well, not always). I consider this here.

Summary

It is understandable that a business wants certainty on a transaction, and it ought to be able to rely on HMRC for confirmation of its own analysis, but obtaining such an opinion is fraught with difficulties, frustrations and (genuine) uncertainty. It seems that HMRC will go to lengths to avoid giving a decision, but they are not reticent in penalising a taxpayer once a business has made a decision, applied it, and HMRC subsequently disagree with the VAT analysis.

A wholly unacceptable situation.