Tag Archives: latest-vat-news

Reclaiming VAT Overseas

By Marcus Ward 16 August 2016

Refunds of VAT for UK businesses incurring other EC Member States

If a business incurs VAT in another EC Member State it is possible to recover it. It is not claimed on a UK VAT return, but via a special claim process which I have set out below. Unfortunately, this procedure is likely to be unavailable after Brexit. I hope that this is a timely reminder as well as a guide as the deadline for the year of the claim is 30 September.

My next article will look at precisely what VAT is recoverable in each Member State in a country by country guide – here

Claim Process

Gone are the days when a business had to make claims directly to the Member State where VAT was incurred; using numerous, complicated forms, in the language of the Member State of claim, and then waiting months, if not years to hear anything.

Now, a simple online claim to HMRC is all that is required. HMRC then coordinate payment for a business from the relevant country. This is a practical overview of the procedure.

All applications must be submitted using the electronic online system. You must be VAT registered in the UK to obtain a refund.

In order to make a claim a business must meet the following conditions:

you must not be registered, liable or eligible to be registered in the Member State of Refund
you must not have any fixed establishment, seat of economic activity, place of business or other residence in the Member State of Refund
during the refund period you must not have supplied any goods or services in the Member State of refund with the exception of;

a) transport services and ancillary services

b) any goods or services where VAT is payable by the person to whom the supply is made (the reverse charge).

By submitting your application you are declaring that you meet these conditions.

How do I claim?

A separate online application is required for each Member State from which you wish to claim. In order to start an application you must access the relevant online services section and enter standard data into the required fields, along with invoice for expenditure you wish to reclaim.

Period application covers

The refund period must not be more than one calendar year or less than three calendar months. Generally refund periods do not have to cover strict calendar quarters. However, some Member States have their own requirements, and details of these can be obtained from the relevant tax authority.

Minimum amount that may be claimed

If the refund application relates to a period of less than a calendar year, but not less than three months the minimum amount claimable is EUR 400 or the equivalent in national currency.

If the refund application relates to a period of a calendar year or the remainder of a calendar year the minimum amount claimable is EUR 50 or the equivalent in national currency.

Invoices included on the application

Invoices relating to supplies of goods or services with a tax point during the period of the refund application should be included. Additionally, a business may claim for invoices not included in a previous application as long as they relate to the same calendar year.

VAT which cannot be included on a claim

A claim cannot include VAT which has been;

incorrectly invoiced,
invoiced in respect of goods despatched to another Member State or exported from the EC
incurred in respect of non-business activities

Information required from invoices being claimed

Name and address of your supplier
Except in cases of importation the VAT identification number or tax reference number of the supplier and the prefix of the Member State of Refund
Date and number of the invoice or importation document
Taxable amount and amount of VAT expressed in the currency of the Member State of refund
The amount of deductible VAT expressed in the currency of the Member State of refund
Where applicable the deductible proportion
Nature of the goods and services acquired, described according to the following expenditure codes: Fuel, Transport Hire, Road Tolls, Travel Expenses (taxi, public transport), Accommodation, Food and Restaurant Services, Admissions to Fairs and Exhibitions, Luxuries/Amusements/Entertainment.

If an invoice includes items covering more than one expenditure code the code relating to the highest proportion of expenditure is the one that should be used.

Restriction of applications in respect of partial exemption

A business must apply the appropriate recovery rate for the goods or services purchased against each invoice or importation on your application, and show the amount of VAT recoverable in the appropriate box. The recovery rate to be applied is the last percentage appropriate to the refund period covering the invoice date. Following an annual adjustment, you will not be required to amend refund applications already submitted. The invoices can only be entered once and the percentage to be used is that covering the invoice date.

Restriction of applications in respect of non-business expenses

Expenditure incurred in another Member State that relates to non-business activities is not claimable under the refund scheme.

Language needed on the application

Member States generally require the application to be in their own language they may allow the use of a second language in the free text fields, and English is a common option. The language(s) required by the Member State of Refund will be displayed on the electronic portal as you complete the application.

Invoices which may be required to be submitted electronically

A business may be requested to submit invoices with values of EUR 1,000 or more (EUR 250 or more in the case of fuel) with the application. All other invoices should be retained as they may be requested at a later date by the Member State of Refund.

Claim updates

A business will be informed electronically at the following key stages of the process.

If your application fails basic validation checks by the electronic portal
When HMRC forwards your application to the Member State of Refund
When the Member State of Refund receives the application
If the Member State of Refund requires additional information from you
When the Member State of Refund makes its decision

Time limits for submitting an application

Applications must be submitted to HMRC at the latest by 30 September of the calendar year following the refund year and will only be considered submitted if the applicant has completed all of the required standing data fields (see above).

Time limits for the Member State of refund to process an application

The Member State of Refund must notify the applicant of its decision to approve or refuse the application within four months of the date they first received the application.

Payment method

The refund will be paid in the Member State of Refund or, at the applicant’s request, in any other Member State. In the latter case, any bank charges for the transfer will be deducted by the Member State of Refund from the amount to be paid to the applicant.

Error on applications

The electronic portal provides a correction facility whereby a business can recall the original application and amend existing details. You may not, however, add new lines.

Penalties

All Member States take a very serious view of incorrect or false applications. Refunds claimed incorrectly on the basis of incorrect or false information can be recovered and penalties and interest may be imposed and further refund applications suspended.

Applications refused

If the Member State of Refund refuses an application fully or partly they must also notify you of the reasons for refusal.

If this happens you can appeal against the decision using the appeals procedure of that Member State. This means that the normal VAT appeals rules of that Member State on time limits, form of appeal etc., will apply.

Interest on delayed applications

Interest may be payable to you by the Member State of Refund if payment is made after the deadline. If applicable, it will be paid from the day following the deadline up to the date the refund is actually paid. Interest rates must be the same as those applied to refunds of VAT to taxable persons established in the Member State of Refund under the national law of that Member State.

Claims on UK VAT returns

VAT incurred overseas must not be claimed on a UK VAT return. If it is, it is liable to an assessment, penalties and interest levied in the UK by HMRC.

International VAT – Complex, expensive and difficult. The triggerpoints

By Marcus Ward 2 August 2016

Further to the recent announcement of our comprehensive and extensive new International tax service offering here I thought it a good idea to provide a brief guide on when a business or an adviser needs to consider indirect tax when selling overseas. I hope this summary will be of use. Please contact us if you feel that any issues here are relevant to you or your clients.

International and cross-border transactions can be extremely complex and frustrating (take it from me if you haven’t already experienced it). From the physical movement of goods to the many various types of services, VAT is a minefield. Not only is it very complicated, but different languages, rules and practices can add to the overall issues with dealing with the tax. This shouldn’t be a barrier to companies doing business across the world and we are here to support and assist you.

We are experienced in advising not only on UK indirect tax, but issues in other EC Member States and matters outside the EC.

Do you know whether you have indirect tax responsibilities in other countries? Do you know whether you are taking advantage of all available reliefs?

There are often complex and conflicting issues concerning VAT when dealing with customers or suppliers outside these shores. Although the EC-wide VAT system is supposed to be harmonised, not unsurprisingly, there are significant differences in domestic law and the application of EC legislation. It is easy to get caught out or not even consider VAT issues outside the UK. There are special rules for a lot of activities, with the rules for International Services particularly complex.

Experience insists that overseas tax authorities do not mitigate any assessments and penalties simply because your business is based outside their country. Another twist is that HMRC are simply not interested in any transactions outside the UK so will not assist with taxpayers’ queries.

So what sort of questions should a business be asking itself and in what circumstances could VAT rear its ugly head?

When should I be considering VAT?

Exporting goods – Do they properly qualify for zero rating?
Dispatching goods to other EC Member States – Are they UK VAT free?
Distance Selling (usually online/mail order) – There are special rules for this.
Selling goods in the UK which are to be removed from the UK.
Retail sales to visiting customers.
Electronically supplied services – MOSS
Imports – what value? Recovery of import VAT. Customs Duties. Procedures. Reliefs.
Acquisitions from other Member States – what are the rules? Self-supplies. Procedures.
Provision of services – What is the Place Of Supply (POS)?
Provision of services – UK VAT, no VAT, overseas VAT chargeable?
Working abroad – What are the rules?
Property owned overseas.
Overseas businesses owning UK property
Purchasing services overseas – VAT free? Self-supplies
Purchasing/hiring transport/vehicles cross border; aeroplanes, yachts, road vehicles etc.
Organising trade fairs, exhibitions seminars or training etc– There are special rules.
The Performance rules eg; cultural, artistic, sporting – There are special rules.
Supplies of electronically supplied services – There are special rules. MOSS (Mini One Stop Shop) issues.
Place of belonging issues. Where do you belong for VAT purposes? Where does your customer belong?
Intercompany charges/management charges/recharges – Require careful consideration.
Filing overseas returns and dealing with overseas authorities’ inspections/investigations
Cross-border transactions in used goods (including works of art and cars) – there are special rules.
When negotiating contracts or pricing transactions/projects. You need to know the VAT position first otherwise you cannot budget correctly.

How we can help

We can assist whether you have an ad-hoc query or you require a full service in an overseas country. We can:

Deal with overseas authorities on your behalf
Resolve disputes with overseas clients/suppliers
Analyse cross-border/international positions
Advise on international structures
Resolve complex international technical problems
File overseas declarations/returns and registrations
Deal with HMRC on complex POS matters
Assist with classification and valuation matters
Deal with documentation (which can be complex and demanding)
Review and advise on contracts and tenders
Liaise with local domestic legal/accountancy advisers in overseas countries
Advise overseas businesses making supplies into the UK
Assist with e-services matters including MOSS
Resolve disputes with HMRC
Handle claims for VAT incurred overseas for a UK business and UK VAT claims for overseas businesses
Act as a one-stop shop for all of your overseas tax matters.

So don’t let tax interfere with your business expanding overseas, we are here to help you.

VAT Latest from the courts – more on composite or separate supplies

By Marcus Ward 1 August 2016

The case of: General Healthcare Group Limited (GHG)

Those that have read my articles in the past will recognise the topic of composite or separate supplies rears its ugly head on many occasions. It is a matter that has occupied businesses, advisers and HMRC since VAT’s inception, and shows no signs of disappearing any time soon. To put it into the Tribunal chairman’s words: This is another appeal on the subject of whether a transaction which comprises several different elements should be regarded as a single supply or several distinct and independent supplies.

In the latest episode, a ruling was handed down by the Upper Tribunal (UTT) in the case of GHG.

Background

GHG challenged the decision in the First tier Tribunal (FTT) that it made a single supply of prostheses and operating services via its consultants. Consultants fit prostheses in certain procedures, eg; hip replacements when they operate in GHG hospitals. The prostheses are supplied by GHG which also provide the hospital facilities to enable the independent, self-employed consultants to supply healthcare which includes the fitting of prostheses, to its patients. The FTT (in the lead case of Nuffield Hospital with GHG) decided that there was a single supply of exempt healthcare to the patient in these circumstances. GHG appealed against this decision, contending that there is one supply of exempt healthcare, and a separate zero rated supply of the prosthetics prescribed and fitted by the consultants who performed the operations.

VAT Impact

Treating the prosthetics as zero rated rather than exempt would have no impact on output tax (no VAT would be due in either analysis) but zero rating would enable GHG to recover input tax on the prosthetics in question and an increased amount of VAT incurred on general overheads. It is likely that such a claim, across the board would run into many multi-millions.

Decision

The UT dismissed GHG’s appeal, stating that “… from the point of view of the typical patient who requires a prosthesis, GHG makes a single supply of hospital and medical care which includes providing the prosthesis to be fitted by the consultant …”.

Commentary

The decision appears logical and in line with both EC and UK legislation and past case law and was not really a surprise. In these type of cases it is important to consider what the recipient of the supply thinks (s)he is receiving. In this case, and having been on the receiving end of a similar procedure (although I hope that I am a few years off a hip replacement) I think it is absolutely accurate to say that the patient would consider that (s)he is receiving a single supply of medical care. However, I have no doubt that the patient who has just received a new hip would be very unlikely to be thinking of the VAT treatment of their….errr treatment in the slightest…..

The UTT chairman stated that it declined to make any reference to the CJEU.

As always, this is a tricky area, if you have received any questionable rulings from HMRC on single/multiple supplies, or wonder whether there is a different way of analysing your supplies, please contact us as explained above, the matter continues to throw up interesting results.

Full case here

Our New International Service – VAT, Customs Duty, Sales Tax

By Marcus Ward 1 August 2016

Due to a new strategic alliance, we are now able to offer a true worldwide tax, customs duty and excise service.

Gone are the days when you, or your clients, had to deal individually with representatives in different countries, or pay extremely high fees and receive less than immediate service from the big 4. We now act as a one stop shop for nearly every country in the world. Whether it be;

a sales tax issue in Texas
a dispute with the authorities in Romania
a Customs Duty problem with entering goods into Mumbai
appointing a tax representative in Hong Kong
a disagreement over tax with a customer in Switzerland, or
a requirement to file documents in Russia,

we can do this on your behalf.

Of course, we cover every EC Member State – which may be increasing important after Brexit.

We offer a comprehensive, immediate and very reasonably priced service with total transparency on cost and quick response times. We can handle all matters including; advice, structuring, support and compliance while dealing with language issues, understanding domestic legislation and dealing with the relevant authorities in each country. All advice is provided by our very experienced and highly qualified staff with a comprehensive network of contacts. We understand local practices and customs as well as the precise technical requirements. Our advice aims to remove uncertainty and provides a definitive view, rather than a business having to rely on hearsay, incomplete or outdated online information, or advice from a customer/supplier which may not be accurate – all of which we have seen in the past and which can lead to very expensive surprises.

Our service covers the ambit from a small business’ first time cross-border or overseas transaction, to the largest multi-national.

Please contact me should you, or your clients have any international issues, or if you, or they are dissatisfied with current advice in this respect. We can also act on behalf of other VAT consultancies which do not have worldwide coverage.

In a forthcomingt article we will consider International transactions and triggerpoints for when assistance may be required.

VAT – Latest from the courts: impact of outside the scope income

By Marcus Ward 25 July 2016

Outside the scope (of VAT) income leads to loss of input tax: Upper Tribunal (UT) decision

In the recent UT case of VCS it was decided that input tax relating to outside the scope activities of the appellant was not recoverable.

Background

VCS is a car park operator, which manages and operates car parking for its clients on private land. Inter alia, providing parking control services, including the issue of parking permits and enforcement action (solely at the discretion of VCS).

In practice, most of VCS’s revenue is derived not from providing parking permits, but from parking charge notices (“PCNs”) which it issues to motorists who are in breach of the rules for parking in the car parks. In the period considered, approximately 92% of VCS’s income came from PCNs, and just 8% from parking permits. In March 2013 the Court of Appeal (CoA) decided that the PCN revenue was not subject to VAT. This was because VAT is chargeable only in respect of revenue from the supply of goods or services. The CoA held that the PCN revenue was not earned in respect of supplies of services liable to VAT. Rather, the PCN revenue represented damages for breach of contracts between VCS and the motorists and/or damages for trespass by the motorists.

Decision

The UT agreed with the First-tier Tribunal’s decision that that VCS was not entitled to recover input tax that related to outside the scope (PCN) income and that it was reasonable to assume that since 92% of the income generated by VCS was outside the scope of VAT, only 8% of the input tax incurred on its costs should be deductible.

Commentary

It is clear that there is a direct link between the general overheads of the business in respect of which VCS incurred input VAT and both VCS’s taxable supplies of parking permits and the PCN income. The appellant’s contention that a taxable person (such as VCS) is entitled to deduct all the input tax if the goods or services are used to any extent for the purposes of taxed transactions was doomed to failure and the chairman stated that “…we accept HMRC’s interpretation of Article 168 PVD. Accordingly, where purchased goods or services are used by a taxable person both for transactions in respect of which VAT is deductible (ie; taxable supplies) and for transactions in respect of which VAT is not deductible (ie; where the transactions do not constitute economic activity or do not constitute taxable supplies (even though they may be transactions undertaken in the course of a taxable person’s business) or where the supplies are exempt), VAT may only be deducted in so far as (that is, to the extent that) it is attributable to taxable supplies.”.

There are no surprises in this decision, but it serves as a timely reminder that not only is “VAT free” income not always a beneficial treatment, but any income that does not relate to a business’s’ taxable supplies can create costs and complexities, whether it be outside the scope, non-business, or exempt.

Outside the scope income can be received by any business in certain circumstances, and it must be recognised in its VAT reporting as this case demonstrates that not all input tax may be recovered and there is no de minimis for input tax attributed to outside the scope and non-business, it is simply not input tax.

Full case Vehicle Control Services Limited (VCS)

VAT – The “business” of shooting; a tale

By Marcus Ward 15 July 2016

Sometimes one is involved in a dispute which goes to the core of the tax. This is a case which highlights basic VAT principles, HMRC’s approach to an issue and the lengths to which a taxpayer has to go to defend his position.

Are you sitting comfortably?

A day out in the countryside; striding across beautiful landscape, amongst friends, enjoying each other’s’ company and a bit of sport – can this really be the subject of such intense debate with HMRC? Well, unfortunately this seems to be the case when it comes to the operation of a day’s shooting. In the eyes of the taxman, whether or not a profit or a surplus is achieved, shooting, conducted in the course of furtherance of a business is subject to VAT.

This is not usually an issue which shooting syndicates find themselves having to address; they are not concerned with the ins and outs of what constitutes a business for the purposes of the VAT legislation. However, HMRC was pursuing this issue in earnest and they have a team devoted solely to attacking shoots.

Who is HMRC targeting?

HMRC seem to be focusing on syndicate run shoots which are not registered for VAT but who HMRC believe are operating on business principles. If an organisation is operating as a business then it may be liable to register for VAT if certain income thresholds are exceeded. The shoot will then have to charge output VAT on the supplies it makes. In my case there would have been a significant assessment plus penalties and interest which could double the past VAT bill.

How is HMRC attacking the issue?

HMRC is looking closely at the specific activities of syndicate shoots in order to build an argument demonstrating that the organisation of the shoot is run on “sound business principles”. The reason that there is room for debate on this matter is that what constitutes a business is not explicitly defined anywhere in the VAT legislation either in UK or EC law. Rather, the issue has been defined in case law.

The defining case was Lord Fisher, which co-incidentally also concerned a shoot. This case is relied upon throughout the VAT world to give guidance on what constitutes a business – and not just in respect of shoots but for all types of activity.

Anyway, back to this syndicate…

I was involved in a battle lasting four years which concerned a local shoot run for over five decades by a group of friends and which was provided only for the benefit of the syndicate members. The shoot was not open to the common commercial market place or members of the public and the shoot did not advertise. HMRC spent a great deal of time trying to understand the finer details of the running of this shoot and concluded that it was a business

We advised The Shoot to appeal to the VAT Tribunal against HMRC’s decision to levy VAT on its activities.

They key to the syndicate’s defence was to demonstrate that no true business would operate commercially in the way that The Shoot does. If it did, it would be completely unprofitable and would soon be out of business. To demonstrate this effectively, every aspect of the shoot was examined in detail and compared and contrasted with the way a commercial shoot operates. This involved everything from the lunch arrangements, CVs of the gamekeepers and how beautiful the land is, right through to whether chicks or poults are purchased and whether local deer were sold to the highest bidder. However, the most important factor was the demonstration that the syndicate does not have a profit built in to the cost structure and the amounts that the syndicate members contribute. The syndicate is run on a cost sharing basis and is not “an activity likely to be carried out by a private undertaking on a market, organised within a professional framework and generally performed in the interest of generating a profit.”

It all sounds so simple to those familiar with the industry but unfortunately from a VAT ‘business’ perspective it has been a long, stressful and costly argument for the appellant to make. A few days before the case was to be heard at the Tribunal, HMRC withdrew their assessment and conceded the case.

HMRC had seen the many witness statements filed by the members of the syndicate waxing lyrical about how this was an age-old hobby run by a few friends and in no way could it be considered a commercial business. They had seen the expert witness report written by a specialist in the field. The distinctions made between commercial and syndicate shooting were made very clear. They had also seen the powerful argument which concluded that the shoot “cannot seriously be suggested to amount to a ‘business’ for the purpose of the VAT code”.

What this means?

Of course this victory over HMRC was a fantastic result for the members of the The Shoot, but from a practical point of view quite frustrating in that the case was not heard; denying other entities the benefit of the predicted victory. Alas, it was one case that HMRC could not afford to lose.

It is therefore likely that HMRC will continue to target other shoots where they think they can ‘win’ or at least not be challenged.

Have you been affected? – What should you do next?

If this makes for frighteningly familiar reading and you or your local syndicate shoot are, or have been, under HMRC investigation then it is vital that you should take professional advice. As we orchestrated the defence for The Shoot we are the leading advisers in such matters.

For completeness, the six tests derived from the Lord Fisher case (and others) are:

Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made?
Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

The recent case of Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft is also helpful in looking at what a business is details here

VAT – Latest from the courts: A round up of partial exemption

By Marcus Ward 20 June 2016

The partial exemption calculation

The calculation is required to quantify the amount of input tax a partly exempt business is able to claim. A partly exempt business is one which makes a mixture of taxable and non-taxable (eg; exempt) supplies. Input tax attributable to exempt activities is not recoverable.

With certain businesses HMRC accept that the usual “partial exemption standard method” based on taxable turnover versus exempt turnover is either impractical, distortive, or inappropriate. In such cases the business submits an application for a partial exemption special method (PESM). This may be based on many various factors such as; floorspace, staff numbers, transaction counts, management accounting etc (or any combination). If HMRC accept that the proposal is fair and reasonable, a formal agreement will be entered into by both parties.

The question in this case was when a PESM is agreed with HMRC is there a requirement to round up figures to a whole percentage point?

According to the CJEU decision in Kreissparkasse Wiedenbrück the answer is no. It was decided that, via EC legislation, in cases where there is a PESM agreement in place there was no obligation to round up.

The view was that as a significant amount of PESMs are “sophisticated” (compared to the partial exemption standard method) they achieve a more accurate allocation of input tax between taxable and exempt activities and rounding would counter this accuracy.

Full case here

Please contact us if your business is partly exempt and you either have a PESM in place, are in the process of agreeing one, or feel that your input tax recovery is suffering by the use of the standard method.

VAT Quickie – HMRC change bank details for payments

By Marcus Ward 13 June 2016

HMRC’s new bank details

Most taxpayers who pay electronically will not be affected by the change. However, if a business pays its VAT using HMRC’s IBAN and BIC need to use the new IBAN and BIC with immediate effect. This change will mainly affect overseas businesses. It is observed that HMRC’s efforts to publicise this change have not been very successful.

Details for Overseas payments:

Account Number (IBAN) GB36BARC20051773152391

BIC BARCGB22

Account Name: HMRC VAT

HMRC banking address:

Barclays Bank PLC
1 Churchill Place
London
United Kingdom
E14 5HP

VAT Latest from the courts – what is a business?

By Marcus Ward 8 June 2016

In the CJEU case of * * takes a deep breath * * Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft the court considered whether these Not For Profit companies were making taxable supplies (economic activity). This then dictated whether input tax incurred by them was recoverable.

As a starting point, it may be helpful to look at what the words “economic activity”, “business”, “taxable supplies” and “taxable person” mean: The term “business” is only used in UK legislation, The Principal VAT Directive refers to “economic activity” rather than business and since UK domestic legislation must conform to the Directive both terms must be seen as having the same meaning. Since the very first days of VAT there have been disagreements over what constitutes a “business”. I have only recently ended a dispute over this definition for a (as it turns out) very happy client. In the UK the tests were set out as long ago as 1981 and may be summarised as follows:

Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made (bearing in mind that exempt supplies can also be business)?
Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
Is the activity predominately concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

If there is no business, an entity cannot be making taxable supplies.

In EC Legislation, Article 9(1) of Directive 2006/112 provides: that “a ‘Taxable person’ shall mean any person who, independently, carries out in any place any economic activity, whatever the purpose or results of that activity.”

The case

The case involved the Not For Profit companies constructing and operating a water disposal system. When complete, it was intended to charge a “modest” fee to users of the system. The companies engaged in economic activities that were not intended to make a profit and only engaged in a commercial activity on an ancillary basis.

The majority of the funding for the work was provided by State (Hungarian) and EC aid. The Hungarian authority formed the view that, because a nominal fee was charged this did not amount to an economic activity and so there was no right to deduct input tax incurred on the costs of getting the system operational. The CJEU went straight to judgement and decided that the construction and operation of the system could rightly be regarded as an economic activity and found for the taxpayer. It also provided a very helpful and clear summary in respect of “business” by commenting that “… the fact that the price paid for an economic transaction is higher or lower than the cost price, and, therefore, higher or lower than the open market value, is irrelevant for the purpose of establishing whether it was a transaction effected for consideration …”.

NB: The one area that the CJEU did refer back to the National Court however, was whether the transaction at issue in the case was a wholly artificial arrangement which did not reflect economic reality and was set up with the sole aim of obtaining a tax advantage.

It is interesting to compare this finding with the UK case law above, especially the points concerning “a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made” and “sound and recognised business principles”. I strongly suspect that what constitutes a business will continue to occupy advisers and HMRC and throw up disputes until the end of time (and/or the end of VAT….).

Full case here

VAT Schemes Guide – Alternative ways of accounting for tax

By Marcus Ward 1 June 2016

There are a number of VAT Schemes which are designed to simplify accounting for the tax. They may save a business money, reduce complexity, avoid the need for certain documentation and reduce the time needed to deal with VAT. Some schemes may be used in combination with others, although I recommend that checks should be made first.

It is important to compare the use of each scheme to standard VAT accounting to establish whether a business will benefit. Some schemes are compulsory and there are particular pitfalls for certain businesses using certain schemes.

I thought that it would be useful to consider the schemes all in one place and look at their features and pros and cons.

These schemes reviewed here are:

Cash Accounting Scheme
Annual Accounting Scheme
Flat Rate Scheme
Margin schemes for second-hand goods
Global Accounting
VAT schemes for retailers
Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme

Cash Accounting Scheme

Normally, VAT returns are based on the tax point (usually the VAT invoice date) for sales and purchases. This may mean a business having to pay HMRC the VAT due on sales that its customers have not yet paid for.

The VAT cash accounting scheme instead bases reporting on payment dates, both for purchases and sales. A business will need to ensure its records include payment dates.

A business is only eligible for the Cash Accounting Scheme if its estimated taxable turnover is no more than £1.35m, and can then remain in the scheme as long as it remains below £1.6m.

Advantages

Usually beneficial for cash flow especially if its customers are slow paying
Output tax is not payable at all if a business has a bad debt

Disadvantages

Is generally not beneficial for a repayment business (one which reclaims more VAT than it pays, eg; an exporter or supplier of zero rated goods or services)
Not usually beneficial if a business purchases significant amounts of goods or services on credit

Annual Accounting Scheme

The Annual Accounting Scheme allows a business to pay VAT on account, in either nine monthly or three quarterly payments. These instalments are based on VAT paid in the previous year. It is then required to complete a single, annual VAT return which is used to calculate any balance owed by the business or due from HMRC.

A business is eligible for the scheme if its estimated taxable turnover is no more than £1.35m and is permitted to remain in the scheme as long as it remains below £1.6m.

Advantages

Reduces paperwork as only the need to complete one return instead of four (Although it does not remove the requirement to keep all the normal VAT records and accounts)
Improves management of cash flow

Disadvantages

Not suitable for repayment businesses as they would only receive one repayment at the end of the year
If turnover decreases, the interim payments may be higher than under standard accounting

Flat Rate Scheme

The Flat Rate Scheme is designed to assist smaller businesses reduce the amount of time and complexity required for VAT accounting. The Flat Rate Scheme removes the need to calculate the VAT on every transaction. Instead, a business pays a flat rate percentage of its VAT inclusive turnover. The percentage paid is less than the standard VAT rate because it recognises the fact that no input tax can be claimed on purchases. The flat rate percentage used is dependent on a business’ trade sector.

A business is eligible for this scheme if its estimated taxable turnover in the next year will not exceed £150,000. Once using the scheme, a business is permitted to continue using it until its income exceeds £230,000.

If eligible, a business may combine the Flat Rate Scheme with the Annual Accounting Schemes, additionally, there is an option to effectively use a cash basis so there is no need to use the Cash Accounting Scheme. There has been recent case law on the percentage certain businesses’ use for the FRS, so it is worth checking closely. There is a one percent discount for a business in its first year of trading.

Advantages

Depending on trade sector and circumstances may result in a real VAT saving
Simplified record keeping; no requirement to separate out gross, VAT and net in accounts
Fewer rules; no issues with input tax a business can and cannot recover on purchases
Certainty of knowing how much of income is payable to HMRC

Disadvantages

No reclaim of input tax incurred on purchases
If you buy a significant amount from VAT registered businesses, it is likely to result in more VAT due
Likely to be unattractive for businesses making zero-rated or exempt sales because output tax would also apply to this hitherto VAT free income
Low turnover limit

Margin Scheme for Second Hand Goods

A business normally accounts for output tax on the full value of its taxable supplies and reclaims input tax on its purchases. However, if a business deals in second-hand goods, works of art, antiques or collectibles it may use a Margin Scheme. This scheme enables a business to account for VAT only on the difference between the purchase and selling price of an item; the margin. It is not possible to reclaim input tax on the purchase of an item and there will be no output tax if no profit is achieved. There is a special margin schemes for auctioneers. A variation of the Margin Scheme is considered below.

Advantages

Usually beneficial if buying from (non-VAT registered) members of the public
Applies to EC cross-border sales
Purchaser will not see a VAT charge
Although no input tax claimable on purchases of scheme items, VAT may be claimed in the usual way on overheads and other fees etc

Disadvantages

Record keeping requirements are demanding and closely checked, eg; stock records and invoices which are required for both purchases and sales
Cannot be used for items purchased on a VAT invoice
Can be complex and create a cost if goods exported
Although no VAT due on sales if a loss is made, there is no set-off of the loss

Global Accounting

The problem with the Second Hand Goods Scheme is that full details of each individual item purchased and sold has to be recorded. Global Accounting is an optional, simplified variation of the Second Hand Margin Scheme. It differs from the standard Margin Scheme in that rather than accounting for the margin achieved on the sale of each individual item, output tax is calculated on the margin achieved between the total purchases and total sales in a particular accounting period.

Advantages

Simplified version of the Margin Scheme
Record keeping requirements reduced
Losses made on sales reduce VAT payable
Beneficial for businesses which buy and sell bulk volume, low value eligible goods

Disadvantages

Cannot be used for; aircraft, boats, caravans, horses or motor vehicles
Similar to Margin Scheme disadvantages apart from loss set off

VAT Schemes for Retailers

It is usually difficult for retailers to issue an invoice for each sale made, so various retail schemes have been designed to simplify VAT. The appropriate scheme for a business depends on whether its retail turnover (excluding VAT) is; below £1m, between £1m and £130m and higher.

Smaller businesses may be able to use a retail scheme with Cash Accounting and Annual Accounting but it cannot combine a Retail Scheme with the Flat Rate Scheme. However, retailers may choose to use the Flat Rate Scheme instead of a Retail Scheme.

Using standard VAT accounting, a VAT registered business must record the VAT on each sale. However, via a Retail Scheme, it calculates the value of its total VAT taxable sales for a period, eg; a day, and the proportions of that total that are taxable at different rates of VAT; standard, reduced and zero.

According to the scheme a business uses it then applies the appropriate VAT fraction to that sales figure to calculate the output tax due. A business may only use the Retail Scheme for retail sales and must use the standard accounting procedures for other supplies. It must still issue a VAT invoice to any VAT registered customer who requests one. It is a requirement of any scheme choice that HMRC must consider it fair and reasonable.

Examples of Retail Schemes

Apportionment
Direct calculation
The point of sale scheme

There are special arrangements for caterers, retail pharmacists and florists.

Advantages

No requirement to issue an invoice for each sale
Most schemes are relatively simple to administer once set up. Technology assists in a helpful way with EPOS systems
Simplifies record keeping

Disadvantages

It is usual for each line sold to need to be coded correctly for VAT liability
Smaller businesses without state of the art technology may be at a disadvantage
Time and resources required to set up and maintain systems
In some cases the calculation depends on staff “pressing the right button”

Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS)

This simplifies cross-border supplies by fixing the place of supply where the tour operator is located (rather than applying the usual place of supply rules). Tour operators often buy goods and services from businesses in overseas countries and often cannot reclaim the associated input tax. The TOMS resolves this issue by permitting tour operators to calculate the VAT solely on the value they add. This is, in theory, similar to the Margin Scheme above. The scheme applies to any business that buys in and re-sells; travel, accommodation and certain other services as a principal. It not only affects the normal High Street travel companies, but entities such as; schools, hospitality companies, organisers of events etc. TOMS is compulsory and it applies to supplies made to/in in the UK as well as overseas.

Advantages

Avoids the need for the tour operator to VAT register in every country it makes supplies to/in
Effectively gives credit for input tax incurred overseas as well as the UK
No VAT shown on documents issued to clients

Disadvantages

Often complex calculations and record keeping
Very precise and complicated rules
Lack of understanding by a number of inspectors
Complexity increases the risk of misdeclaration

Overall

As may be seen, there are a lot of choices for a business to consider, especially a start-up. Choosing a scheme which is inappropriate may result in VAT overpayment and a lot of unneeded record keeping and administration. There are real savings to be made by using a beneficial scheme, both in terms of VAT payable and staff time.

We are happy to review a business’ circumstances and calculate what schemes would produce the best outcome.

Please contact us if you require further information.

 Marcus Ward Consultancy Ltd 2016

For completeness, the six tests derived from the Lord Fisher case (and others) are:

Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?

Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?

Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made?

Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?

Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?

Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

The recent case of Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft is also helpful in looking at what a business is details here