Tag Archives: international
VAT: HMRC Tax Update 2026: Simplification, Modernisation and Fairness
HMRC has published Tax Update 2026: Simplification, Modernisation and Fairness which announces “a package of tax and customs measures to reduce administrative burdens, improve certainty, fairness, and customer experience”.
The main VAT matters are:
Digitising the option to tax process
The government will introduce new digital channels for submitting option to tax notifications and revocations, replacing existing paper-based processes. This change will make it easier for businesses and agents to manage VAT option to tax notifications, improving accuracy, reducing processing times and removing reliance on paper forms. It will incorporate industry requirements, including bulk uploads, for option to tax notifications, revocations and VAT registration cancellations. It will also support a more efficient and secure digital experience for taxpayers. These channels will be live before the end of 2026.
Direct Debit payments
HMRC is consulting on making Direct Debit the default payment method for VAT (and PAYE) return liabilities, with a shift away from manual bank transfers, CHAPS and Faster Payments which are currently the most used methods for business’ VAT settlement. This is presented as a simplification measure, but will require businesses to revisit treasury controls, mandates, and authorisation processes — particularly for groups with centralised treasury or multiple bank accounts.
Supplementary Data for VAT Returns
The government will explore whether better use of VAT data that businesses already hold in their digital accounting systems could help HMRC work more efficiently. This work will consider how data already held within the businesses’ digital accounting systems for audit purposes could be used to support compliance and improve the effectiveness of the tax system. Engagement with stakeholders will inform any future decisions.
Online Marketplace Liability
The government has published a consultation seeking views on the proposed extension of the VAT online marketplace liability rules to UK based businesses. The proposed reforms intend to tackle VAT non-compliance from overseas and UK based businesses which can distort competition and place compliant businesses, both online and on the high street, at a disadvantage. The government intends to minimise impacts on genuine UK businesses not required to pay VAT, and is seeking views on options to do so.
Electronic Sales Suppression Software Standards (ESS)
The government has published a consultation on the introduction of software standards for the Electronic and Mobile Point of Sale (EPOS/MPOS) Sector to explore how best to embed standards across the latest products and innovations. This consultation seeks views from businesses, software developers and wider stakeholders on measures designed to prevent electronic sales suppression and support fair competition on the high street. The government aims to ensure any future approach minimises burdens on compliant businesses, and believes that strengthened controls, such as modern encryption and record standardisation in the EPOS sector, have the potential to dramatically reduce the incidence of ESS or ‘till fraud’.
VAT: Consignment and call-off stock
VAT basics
Consignment, call-off stock, and sale or return goods
If a business is required to provide regular sales of goods to customers, a prudent business structure is to keep inventory in a warehouse near the customer, or which belongs to the customer. This is likely to reduce transport costs and provides quicker access to the goods thus reducing time in the supply chain. There are specific VAT rules for businesses which hold stock in foreign countries. They stipulate when, and what VAT should be charged, and if a business needs to VAT register as a non-resident trader in another country in which it is warehousing its goods.
Below we consider what the terms mean, the differences and the VAT treatment applicable.
Differences
There is often confusion over the terms; consignment and call-off stock, and they are sometimes used interchangeably. They are differentiated based on who controls access to, and use of, the goods. The difference determines the VAT requirements and compliance rules, so it is important to identify the actual arrangements a business has in place, or plan for the most beneficial outcome. Both of these measures involve the transfer of a business’ own goods – for the purposes of this article; cross-border. The transfer of goods within the same legal entity from one country to another is a deemed supply. This fact is sometimes missed, which can lead to problems. The VAT rules differ from country to country and create legal uncertainty for businesses.
In summary
- Consignment stock
Consignment stocks are created when a business transfers its own goods to another Member State to create a stock over which it has control and from which it makes supplies. Typically, there are multiple potential customers for consignment stock.
Note: Goods sent to an overseas customer on sale or return are treated in the same way as consignment stocks.
- Call-off stock
Call-off stock is the transfer of goods by a business from one Member State to another to create a stock of goods from which its customers can ‘call-off’ ie; use and pay for the goods as and when they require them.
Not call-off stock
Goods delivered to storage facilities operated by the supplier, rather than the customer, should be treated as consignment stocks (see above). If stocks of goods are dispatched by a supplier for call-off by more than one customer, this is also likely to be consignment stock.
VAT treatment
Consignment stock
There is an initial deemed supply of own goods to form the stock which takes place in the country from which the goods are originally shipped. This is usually VAT free as a dispatch and the usual documentary requirements apply.
The place of subsequent supplies of the goods, once a buyer has been found (change of ownership) is usually the country in which the stock is held.
Because the business is transferring its own goods “to itself” in another country it will be making an acquisition of goods in that country. The business is likely to be liable to register for VAT there (or appoint a fiscal representative in the country of arrival) and be responsible for import obligations in the other country. Output tax will also be due (at the rate of VAT applicable in the country in which the goods are located) on the sale to a third party.
Consignment stock – reporting requirements
If a UK VAT registered business transfers goods to another country to create a consignment stock it must complete box 6 on the VAT return reporting a value based on the cost of the goods – see HMRC Public Notice 725.
Call-off stock
As the customer has control of the goods in storage, is aware of stock movements, and may take stock whenever he requires this does not generally require the seller to VAT register in the foreign country as a non-resident trader. Such sales are treated as a “regular’ export and the seller is required to show the customer’s VAT number etc on invoices and other documentation in order to treat it as VAT free in the usual way. The time of supply for these supplies is the date the goods are called off by the customer.
Call-off stock – reporting requirements
The supply of call-off stock from the UK to a VAT registered business in another country is VAT free (subject to the normal rules). Box 6 of the VAT return should be completed using a value based on the cost of the goods as above.
VAT: Where do I belong?
VAT Success Stories
Investment company
HMRC denied claims for input tax incurred on costs relating to the potential acquisition of an overseas business and threatened to deregister the plc as it was not, currently, making taxable supplies. Additionally, HMRC contended that even if VAT registration was appropriate, the input tax incurred did not relate to taxable supplies and was therefore blocked.
We were able to persuade HMRC that our client had a right to be VAT registered because It intended to make taxable supplies (supplies with a place of supply outside the UK which would have been taxable if made in the UK) and that the input tax was recoverable as it related to these intended taxable supplies (management charges to the acquired business). This is a hot topic at the moment, but we were able to eventually demonstrate, with considerable and detailed evidence that there was a true intention.
This meant that UK VAT registration was correct and input tax running into hundreds of thousands of pounds incurred in the UK was repaid.
Restaurant
We identified and submitted a claim for a West End restaurant for nearly £200,000 overpaid output tax. We finally agreed the repayment with HMRC after dealing with issues such as the quantum of the claim and unjust enrichment.
Developer
Our property developing client specialises in very high-end residential projects in exclusive parts of London. They built a dwelling using an existing façade and part of a side elevation. We contended that it was a new build (zero rated sale and no VAT on construction costs and full input tax recovery on other costs). HMRC took the view that it was work on an existing dwelling so that 5% applied and input tax was not recoverable. After site visits, detailed plans, current and historical photograph evidence HMRC accepted the holy grail of new build. The overall cost of the project was tens of millions.
Charity
A charity client was supplying services to the NHS. The issue was whether they were standard rated supplies of staff or exempt medical services. We argued successfully that, despite previous rulings, the supplies were exempt, which benefited all parties. Our client was able to deregister from VAT, but not only that, we persuaded HMRC that input tax previously claimed could be kept. This was a rather pleasant surprise outcome. We also avoided any penalties and interest so that VAT did not represent a cost to the charity in any way. If the VAT was required to be repaid to HMRC it is likely that the charity would have been wound up.
Shoot
A group of friends met to shoot game as a hobby. They made financial contributions to the syndicate in order to take part. HMRC considered that this was a business activity and threatened to go back over 40 years and assess for output tax on the syndicate’s takings which amounted to many hundreds of thousands of pounds and would have meant the shoot could not continue. We appealed the decision to retrospectively register the syndicate.
After a four-year battle HMRC settled on the steps of the Tribunal. We were able to demonstrate that the syndicate was run on a cost sharing basis and is not “an activity likely to be carried out by a private undertaking on a market, organised within a professional framework and generally performed in the interest of generating a profit.” – A happy client.
Chemist
We assisted a chemist client who, for unfortunate reasons, had not been able to submit proper VAT returns for a number of years. We were able to reconstruct the VAT records which showed a repayment of circa £500,000 of VAT was due. We successfully negotiated with HMRC and assisted with the inspection which was generated by the claim.
The message? Never accept a HMRC decision, and seek good advice!
A VAT did you know?
Around 50% of businesses do not recover VAT incurred overseas and there is an estimated $5 billion not reclaimed each year.
VAT: New, important HMRC guidance for zero-rating exports
HMRC has updated its Notice 703 which explains the conditions for VAT zero-rating exports of goods. It is crucial for a business to have the correct documentation to evidence goods physically moving out of the UK.
Information on official evidence has been updated in paragraphs 6.2, 7.1 and 7.2 as follows:
- Para 6.2 Official evidence
Official evidence is an export declaration for the goods submitted to the Customs Declaration Service which has generated a departure confirmation. You will need the Movement Reference Number (MRN) or Declaration Unique Consignment Reference (DUCR) of the declaration.
- Para 7.1 Air and sea freight
- If you are using commercial transport documents as proof of export for goods exported outside the UK or EU by:
- air — you must obtain and retain an authenticated basic master airway bill or house air waybill endorsed with the flight prefix and number, and the date and place of departure
- sea — you must keep one of the copies of the bill of lading or sea waybill along with a note of the export declaration Movement Reference Number (MRN) or Declaration Unique Consignment Reference (DUCR) or, where a shipping company does not issue these, a certificate of shipment (certifying actual shipment) along with a note of the export MRN or DUCR, given by a responsible official of that company.
-
7.2 Road freight
The international consignment note provides evidence of the identity of the contracting parties when goods are transferred by road. It is in 3 parts and is completed and signed by the sender of the goods, the carrier and the person receiving the goods. If the international consignment note is used as part of the evidence, it is important that the information is complete and all the details legible. Where the overseas customer arranges for the goods to be collected ex-works the international consignment note alone is not conclusive evidence that the goods in question have left the UK. Read paragraph 6.6 for additional evidence required when making an indirect export.
Where goods leave through a port using the Goods Vehicle Movement Service, you should retain the Goods Movement Reference of the vehicle for that journey.
Failure to produce the appropriate and accurate evidence will result in output tax being due on the relevant goods.
EU – Elimination of the threshold-based customs duty relief
Updated Guidance on Zero-Rated VAT for UK Exported Goods and Customs Processes
HMRC has updated its guidance on applying zero-rated VAT to goods exported from the UK – VAT Notice 703.
The amendments reflect the latest legal requirements (the latest force of law) and customs processes as of 13 February 2026 and removes outdated customs terminology and guidance.
Summary
Goods exported from the UK can be zero‑rated provided they physically leave the UK and all HMRC conditions are met. Notice 703 sets out who can apply zero‑rating and the legal basis under the VAT Act 1994.
Conditions & time limits: Exporters must ensure goods are exported within specified time limits (generally within three months, but longer in some cases) and meet detailed conditions depending on whether the export is direct, indirect, or in special scenarios (eg; retailers, ships, aircraft).
Evidence & record‑keeping: Zero‑rating is only valid if acceptable proof of export is obtained and retained (such as customs declarations and commercial transport documents), with clear rules on records, customs systems, and compliance checks.
In order to zero-rate a supply, it is vitally important that exporters obtain the correct evidence that goods have physically left the UK and that all descriptions of the goods are accurate and satisfy HMRC requirements. There has been a significant amount of case law on export documentation (an example here) which illustrates that this is often an area of dispute.
Excise Duty: Your Christmas drink of choice, or perhaps not
A curious matter and one which brings into focus the drinking habits of people across the EU. Now, as those who know me will be aware, I am not adverse to a good single malt, nor a decent claret, but I do wonder sometimes where people draw the line.
Background
It transpires that in Lithuania people who choose not to drink, or cannot afford, even the cheapest alcoholic items have turned to drinking perfume and mouthwash which contain isopropyl alcohol. This has a similar effect on the human body to what most people would regard as being from more usual beer, wine or spirits etc. Sounds delicious eh?
Issue
The issue was whether these products where subject to Excise Duty, or, as the appellant contended, they were duty free as cosmetic products.
Decision
The AG found that isopropyl alcohol is almost unpalatable to most people. The fact that Bene Factum held out, advertised and marketed to people to drink the products did not affect the fact that the main purpose of the goods was for their use as cosmetics and mouthwash. What must be considered is Excise Duty depends on an objective classification to determine whether it is intended for human consumption. This classification is not affected by the fact that Bene Factum actively encouraged people to drink these products rather than use them for cosmetic purposes.
Consequently, the goods where not subject to Excise Duty. Good news for Lithuanian alcohol connoisseurs! It remains to see if the court follows this opinion, in most cases they do, but one never knows.
Commentary
If there is anybody out there who is getting ready for their Christmas party, looks at some cosmetic products and considers taking a swig, I make the following comments:
- Probably best to stick supermarket own brand booze if money is an issue
- I expect that these things taste absolutely terrible (although I have not sampled them)
- I tend to stick to things that are to be applied externally doing just that with them without ingestion
- If you can’t decide whether to gargle with something or drink it, I counsel spitting it out
- If these goods come to the UK, at least they will be even cheaper being duty free. I am not sure that is a good thing.