Around 50% of businesses do not recover VAT incurred overseas and there is an estimated $5 billion not reclaimed each year.
Tag Archives: EU-vat
VAT: New, important HMRC guidance for zero-rating exports
HMRC has updated its Notice 703 which explains the conditions for VAT zero-rating exports of goods. It is crucial for a business to have the correct documentation to evidence goods physically moving out of the UK.
Information on official evidence has been updated in paragraphs 6.2, 7.1 and 7.2 as follows:
- Para 6.2 Official evidence
Official evidence is an export declaration for the goods submitted to the Customs Declaration Service which has generated a departure confirmation. You will need the Movement Reference Number (MRN) or Declaration Unique Consignment Reference (DUCR) of the declaration.
- Para 7.1 Air and sea freight
- If you are using commercial transport documents as proof of export for goods exported outside the UK or EU by:
- air — you must obtain and retain an authenticated basic master airway bill or house air waybill endorsed with the flight prefix and number, and the date and place of departure
- sea — you must keep one of the copies of the bill of lading or sea waybill along with a note of the export declaration Movement Reference Number (MRN) or Declaration Unique Consignment Reference (DUCR) or, where a shipping company does not issue these, a certificate of shipment (certifying actual shipment) along with a note of the export MRN or DUCR, given by a responsible official of that company.
-
7.2 Road freight
The international consignment note provides evidence of the identity of the contracting parties when goods are transferred by road. It is in 3 parts and is completed and signed by the sender of the goods, the carrier and the person receiving the goods. If the international consignment note is used as part of the evidence, it is important that the information is complete and all the details legible. Where the overseas customer arranges for the goods to be collected ex-works the international consignment note alone is not conclusive evidence that the goods in question have left the UK. Read paragraph 6.6 for additional evidence required when making an indirect export.
Where goods leave through a port using the Goods Vehicle Movement Service, you should retain the Goods Movement Reference of the vehicle for that journey.
Failure to produce the appropriate and accurate evidence will result in output tax being due on the relevant goods.
EU – Elimination of the threshold-based customs duty relief
The EU will abolish the rule that Customs Duty does not apply to low value goods (less than €150) entering the EU
It will impose a fixed Customs Duty of €3 from 1 July 2026, until completion of the EU data hub which is expected to be on 1 July 2028.
When operational, the data hub will enable Customs Duty to apply to all imported goods, regardless of value, on an ad valorem basis.
Updated Guidance on Zero-Rated VAT for UK Exported Goods and Customs Processes
HMRC has updated its guidance on applying zero-rated VAT to goods exported from the UK – VAT Notice 703.
The amendments reflect the latest legal requirements (the latest force of law) and customs processes as of 13 February 2026 and removes outdated customs terminology and guidance.
Summary
Goods exported from the UK can be zero‑rated provided they physically leave the UK and all HMRC conditions are met. Notice 703 sets out who can apply zero‑rating and the legal basis under the VAT Act 1994.
Conditions & time limits: Exporters must ensure goods are exported within specified time limits (generally within three months, but longer in some cases) and meet detailed conditions depending on whether the export is direct, indirect, or in special scenarios (eg; retailers, ships, aircraft).
Evidence & record‑keeping: Zero‑rating is only valid if acceptable proof of export is obtained and retained (such as customs declarations and commercial transport documents), with clear rules on records, customs systems, and compliance checks.
In order to zero-rate a supply, it is vitally important that exporters obtain the correct evidence that goods have physically left the UK and that all descriptions of the goods are accurate and satisfy HMRC requirements. There has been a significant amount of case law on export documentation (an example here) which illustrates that this is often an area of dispute.
Excise Duty: Your Christmas drink of choice, or perhaps not
A curious matter and one which brings into focus the drinking habits of people across the EU. Now, as those who know me will be aware, I am not adverse to a good single malt, nor a decent claret, but I do wonder sometimes where people draw the line.
Background
It transpires that in Lithuania people who choose not to drink, or cannot afford, even the cheapest alcoholic items have turned to drinking perfume and mouthwash which contain isopropyl alcohol. This has a similar effect on the human body to what most people would regard as being from more usual beer, wine or spirits etc. Sounds delicious eh?
Issue
The issue was whether these products where subject to Excise Duty, or, as the appellant contended, they were duty free as cosmetic products.
Decision
The AG found that isopropyl alcohol is almost unpalatable to most people. The fact that Bene Factum held out, advertised and marketed to people to drink the products did not affect the fact that the main purpose of the goods was for their use as cosmetics and mouthwash. What must be considered is Excise Duty depends on an objective classification to determine whether it is intended for human consumption. This classification is not affected by the fact that Bene Factum actively encouraged people to drink these products rather than use them for cosmetic purposes.
Consequently, the goods where not subject to Excise Duty. Good news for Lithuanian alcohol connoisseurs! It remains to see if the court follows this opinion, in most cases they do, but one never knows.
Commentary
If there is anybody out there who is getting ready for their Christmas party, looks at some cosmetic products and considers taking a swig, I make the following comments:
- Probably best to stick supermarket own brand booze if money is an issue
- I expect that these things taste absolutely terrible (although I have not sampled them)
- I tend to stick to things that are to be applied externally doing just that with them without ingestion
- If you can’t decide whether to gargle with something or drink it, I counsel spitting it out
- If these goods come to the UK, at least they will be even cheaper being duty free. I am not sure that is a good thing.
VAT: New guidance on using postponed VAT accounting
HMRC has published (on 28 November 2025) a collection of new guidance on postponed VAT accounting (PVA).
The guidance covers what a business needs to do if it is using PVA to account for import VAT on its VAT returns.
The publication brings together all PVA guidance, giving detailed information about:
VAT and the 2025 Budget
Budget 26 November 2025
There was not too much excitement in the budget for indirect taxes (there was no change to the registration threshold, nor any VAT rates), but there were some minor changes.
VAT Grouping
The rules relating to cross border VAT grouping will be clarified. From the Budget date of 26 November 2025′ the UK will revert to its previous position on grouping to restore the “whole establishment” principle. HMRC also published Revenue and Customs Brief 7 (2025): Revised VAT grouping rules and the Skandia judgment, confirming that HMRC now considers that an overseas establishment of a business VAT grouped in the UK should be treated as part of that VAT group, even when located in an EU member state that does not operate whole entity VAT grouping.
This means that services provided between a UK head office and its overseas branch will once again be disregarded for VAT purposes, even if the branch belongs to a VAT group in another jurisdiction.
HMRC acknowledges that some VAT groups may have accounted for VAT in line with the previous guidance and may now be eligible to reclaim overpaid VAT through the error correction notification procedure.
This HMRC brief provides more details.
Private hire vehicles
Suppliers of private hire vehicle and taxi services will be excluded from the scope of the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) from 2 January 2026, except where these are supplied in conjunction with certain other travel services. The government also published a response to the Consultation on the VAT Treatment of Private Hire Vehicles and HMRC published Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2025): VAT Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme — supplies by private hire vehicle or taxi operators, which explains how to account for VAT as a private hire vehicle operator, a taxi operator, or business re-selling such supplies.
E-invoicing
The government will require all VAT invoices to be issued in a specified electronic format from April 2029. An implementation roadmap will be published at Budget 2026 further to consultation with businesses.
VAT treatment of business donations of goods to charity
There will be a new VAT relief to be be introduced on 1 April 2026 for business donations of goods to charity for distribution to those in need or use in the delivery of their charitable services, ie; in addition to goods donated for sale. HMRC also published a response to the Consultation on the VAT treatment of business donations of goods to charity, and a policy paper, VAT relief for business donations on goods to charities. The relief will apply to goods valued up to £100 per item, with a higher £200 threshold for essential electrical items to help tackle digital poverty. Eligibility is strictly limited to registered charities, meaning community interest companies (CICs) and social enterprises are excluded unless they register as charities. This corrects an anomaly where there is no VAT liability when businesses dispose of goods to landfill, but may incur one when donating those same goods to charity.
Motability
From 1 July 2026, vehicles leased through the Motability Scheme will be subject to 20% VAT on top-up payments for more expensive vehicles which are made in addition to the transfer of eligible welfare payments for more expensive vehicles on the scheme. The standard rate of Insurance Premium Tax will apply to scheme insurance contracts: VAT and Insurance Premium Tax: change to reliefs for qualifying motor vehicle leasing schemes – GOV.UK There will be no changes to vehicles designed for, or substantially and permanently adapted for, wheelchair or stretcher users.
ATCS
The Government has confirmed that the ‘Advance Tax Certainty Service’ (ATCS) will launch in July 2026 and provide clearances on corporation tax, stamp taxes, VAT, PAYE and the construction industry scheme, where there is no existing statutory route to certainty.
Who can claim import VAT? The TSI Instruments case
Latest from the courts
In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of TSI Instruments Limited the issue was whether the appellant could claim import VAT when it was not the owner of the imported goods. The amount of VAT at stake was circa £8.5 million.
Background
TSI Instruments (TSI) imported scientific equipment owned by its customers for repair. The main activity of TSI in the UK is the service, repair and calibration of TSI Group goods which had previously been sold to customers around the world.
TSI is named as the importer and paid the charges made by the shipping company for dealing with the declaration and customs clearance formalities on behalf of TSI as well as paying the import VAT which it claimed.
Contentions
HMRC refused to repay the claims on the basis that only the entity with title to the goods is able to deduct the import VAT.
The appellant argued there is no requirement in the legislation that the importer should be the owner of the goods in order for import VAT to be credited. TSI asserted that, as long as the goods are imported for the purposes of its taxable business and it bears the costs of the import, the import VAT can be credited as input tax.
Decision
The FTT ruled that TSI was not entitled to claim input VAT credit for import VAT paid on goods it did not own, and the appeal was dismissed. Via both EU and UK VAT law, the right to deduct import VAT is restricted to the actual owner of the goods or the entity which has the right to dispose of the goods as their owner (or where the cost or value of the goods is reflected in the price of specific output transactions or in the price of goods and services supplied in the course of their economic activities). Since TSI did not own the goods, and their value was not included in the repair service price, the FTT ruled against TSI.
Commentary
This position could have been avoided by planning being put in place. TSI could have used Inward Processing Relief or the owner of the goods could have been the importer.
Legislation/HMRC guidance
VIT13300 – Import VAT may only be claimed by the owner of the goods who would be entitled to reclaim the import VAT either in accordance with s24 VATA 1994 (if registered for VAT in the UK) or under part XXI of the VAT Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518) if they are not registered for VAT in the UK, provided they satisfy the legislative conditions. For further information see Notice 723A.
HMRC published Revenue and Customs Briefs 2 (2019) and Brief 15 (2020) which restated HMRC’s long-standing policy that it is the owner of the imported goods who is entitled to recover the import VAT under current UK legislation. These Briefs clarify, but do not change, HMRC’s policy.
VAT & Import Duty
HMRC has updated its Guidance on How to claim a repayment of import duty and VAT if you have overpaid
It sets out how to check time limits and how to claim for importers, agents, freight forwarders or express operators. It also explains how to use the Customs Declaration Service or form C285 as an individual.
It covers:
- who can apply
- when to apply
- how to apply
- what you need — Customs Declaration Service
- apply online — Customs Declaration Service
- what you will need — C285 form
- apply online — C285 form
- what happens after the application
VAT: Tax representatives and tax agents – what is the difference and why it is important
VAT Basics
A Non-Established Taxable Person (NETP) may be required to appoint a tax representative or tax agent if they make taxable supplies in the UK. The term NETP is used to describe a person who is liable to be registered for VAT under the VAT ACT 1994 Schedule 1a. A NETP must register for VAT as soon as it makes its first taxable supply in the UK, or when it expects to make taxable supplies here within the next 30 days, that is; there is no turnover limit for a NETP.
A NETP is a business which has no place of belonging in the UK. So, what is the difference between a representative and agent, and does the NETP get a choice?
Tax representative
A representative maintains the NETP’s VAT records, submits VAT returns and accounts for UK VAT on behalf of the NETP and dels with communication with HMRC. A representative is jointly and severally liable for any VAT debts incurred by the NETP.
A NETP may only appoint one person at a time to act on its behalf, although a tax representative may act for more than one NETP.
Tax agent
An agent carries out a similar role to a representative, however, the important difference is that HMRC cannot hold an agent responsible for any of NETP’s VAT debts. HMRC reserve the right not to deal with any particular agent. In some circumstances, if HMRC deem think it necessary, it will insist that a tax representative is appointed.
As long as HMRC has not directed (see below) a NETP to appoint a tax representative, it can appoint an agent to deal UK VAT affairs. Any arrangement made will be subject to whatever contractual agreement the NETP and agent decide. In some circumstances, if HMRC think it is necessary, it may still insist that a tax representative is appointed.
Distinction
The tax representative and the tax agent both act on behalf of a NETP. However, while the tax agent operates in the name of the NETP, the tax representative operates in its own name. Consequently, a tax representative is personally committed to pay HMRC and must be accredited beforehand. Contracts between representatives/agents need to be clear on this point and fees charged for this work should reflect the difference in responsibilities. Should the NETP fail to pay VAT, penalties and interest due, HMRC will collect these directly from the tax representative, so, in effect, the tax representative represents a monetary insurance for HMRC.
Direction
HMRC can direct some NETPs to appoint a tax representative who must be:
- based in the UK
- fit and proper
this is via VAT Act 1994, section 48(1).
HMRC may choose to require some form of security from a NETP whether or not there has been any direction regarding the appointment of a representative.
Not appointing a tax representative or agent
If a NETP does not wish to appoint a tax representative or agent, and HMRC has not directed them to appoint a tax representative, it must meet all its obligations under UK VAT law itself. This includes, inter alia:
- registering for VAT
- keeping comprehensive record of all transactions in relation to business in the UK
- keeping records required to complete VAT returns
- producing records to HMRC for inspection
- paying the right amount of tax on time
Post Brexit
For UK businesses making overseas supplies:
Businesses established within the EU are exempted from appointing a tax representative in other Member-States (MS) as international tax assistance is compulsory within the EU (the local tax administration can request assistance from the country of establishment to recover the money directly from the business). Since Brexit, the UK became a third country, so this rule does not apply, and MS have the choice to make the appointment of a tax representative compulsory for UK businesses. Most MS have done so, the notable exception being Germany.
New guidance for registration of a NETP here.