Category Archives: VAT Payment

VAT annual statistics updated

By   15 May 2025

HMRC has updated its publication on the VAT official statistics from 2023 to 2024. It covers information on VAT receipts in the UK, statistics on the trader population and VAT registrations. The tables and commentary have been updated to reflect recent receipts.

Headlines

  • total VAT receipts in the financial year 2023 to 2024 increased by 7% to £168 billion compared to £158 billion in 2022 to 2023
  • the VAT population in 2023 to 2024 was 2,178,950, with 238,176 new registrations and 273,768 de-registrations in-year
  • total net VAT liability in 2023 to 2024 was £173 billion
  • the wholesale and retail sector was the largest contributor to net VAT liability (32%) with a total of £55 billion
  • traders with an annual turnover of greater than £10 million paid 75% of total net VAT liability (£130 billion).

VAT: HMRC updates tax avoidance schemes guidance – Stop Notices

By   8 May 2025

HMRC has updated its guidance on promoters of tax avoidance schemes (guidance on Part 5 and Schedules 34 to 36 of the Finance Act 2014).

The guidance explains the rules that apply to promoters of tax avoidance schemes. These rules aim to deter the development and use of avoidance schemes by influencing the behaviour of promoters, their intermediaries, and clients.

Stop Notices

These Notices are covered by The Finance Act 2021, Schedule 30, part 1, section 236A

  1. An authorised officer may give a person a Notice (a “Stop Notice”) if the authorised officer suspects that the recipient promotes, or has promoted, arrangements of a description specified in the notice or proposals for such arrangements.

 HMRC issues Stop Notices to promotors of tax avoidance schemes, requiring them to stop selling or promoting the scheme.

The main aim of issuing these Notices is to reduce the number of tax avoidance schemes that are being marketed. This makes it more difficult for taxpayers to get involved in them.

When HMRC issues a stop notice to a promoter, it means:

  • the promoter who receives the notice must stop selling the specified scheme
  • the promoter who receives the notice must also pass a copy of it to certain associated persons, who are also subject to the stop notice and must also stop selling the specified scheme
  • all those persons subject to the notice must inform HMRC of all the people they have promoted the scheme to and any they continue to promote it to
  • the persons subject to the stop notice must inform all clients and intermediaries that they are subject to a stop notice, what this means, and provide them with a copy of the stop notice

If a promoter fails to comply with a stop notice they can face penalties of up to £100,000 which can increase to £1million.

Our approach to planning and HMRC

Marcus Ward Consultancy Ltd does not market, advise on, or advocate aggressive schemes. The company provides bespoke solutions to an individual business and does not believe in “one size fits all” mass-marketed schemes.  We will always work within the law and the spirit of the law.  We operate a full disclosure policy and may refuse to work with you if you do not subscribe to this attitude.  We will, on occasion, cross swords with HMRC if we believe we are correct and that HMRC is being unreasonable and we will fight to uphold our clients’ rights against any unfair accusations.

VAT: Tribunal costs

By   23 April 2025

    Latest from the courts

    In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Eurolaser IT Ltd regarding Kittel and Mecsek assessments and penalties:

    • whether an agent knew or should have known of fraud in supply chain – yes
    • whether such knowledge/means of knowledge to be attributed to Appellant – yes
    • whether Mecsek requires HMRC to show reasonable steps not taken by Appellant – yes
    • whether reasonable steps taken – no
    • unsurprisingly, the appeal was refused

    one interesting aspect was the award of costs.

    Generally, in FTT cases the rule is that each party will usually bear its own costs.

    However, it is worth recapping how the award of costs works via The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009. In this instant case, the Appellant had not ‘opted out’ of the costs protection regime set out in rule 10(c)(ii) of the Rules. Consequently, the FTT ordered that Eurolaser must pay HMRC’s costs – a sting in the tail. So, what are the rules? (Where relevant here)

    Orders for costs

    “10.—(1) The Tribunal may only make an order in respect of costs (or, in Scotland, expenses)—

    (a) under section 29(4) of the 2007 Act (wasted costs) [and costs incurred in applying for such costs];

    (b) if the Tribunal considers that a party or their representative has acted unreasonably in bringing, defending or conducting the proceedings; 

    (c) if—

    (i) the proceedings have been allocated as a Complex case under rule 23 (allocation of cases to categories); and

    (ii) the taxpayer (or, where more than one party is a taxpayer, one of them) has not sent or delivered a written request to the Tribunal, within 28 days of receiving notice that the case had been allocated as a Complex case, that the proceedings be excluded from potential liability for costs or expenses under this sub-paragraph”

    So, in “Complex” cases, an Appellant must submit a request that the case is excluded from the potential liability of costs being awarded, and HMRC must request repayment of its costs incurred in defending the case.

    What are Complex cases?

    These are complicated cases which:

    • require lengthy or complex evidence
    • require a lengthy hearing
    • involve complex or important principles or issues
    • involve large amounts or tax or penalties

    such cases are allocated to a ‘track’ within the FTT system.

    Other cost awards

    It is also worth remembering that costs can be awarded if the appeal is brought unreasonably. This usually means that it is vexatious or frivolous, so proper advice should be sought when considering an appeal.

    VAT Success Stories

    By   22 April 2025
    I often write about how it is important to seek VAT advice at the right time, see triggerpoints. So, I thought that I’d give some practical examples on where we have saved our clients money, time and aggravation.

    Investment company

    HMRC denied claims for input tax incurred on costs relating to the potential acquisition of an overseas business and threatened to deregister the plc as it was not, currently, making taxable supplies. Additionally, HMRC contended that even if VAT registration was appropriate, the input tax incurred did not relate to taxable supplies and was therefore blocked.

    We were able to persuade HMRC that our client had a right to be VAT registered because it intended to make taxable supplies (supplies with a place of supply outside the UK which would have been taxable if made in the UK) and that the input tax was recoverable as it related to these intended taxable supplies (management charges to the acquired business). This is a hot topic at the moment, but we were able to eventually demonstrate, with considerable and detailed evidence that there was a true intention.

    This meant that UK VAT registration was correct and input tax running into hundreds of thousands of pounds incurred in the UK was repaid to our client.

    Restaurant

    We identified and submitted a claim for a West End restaurant for nearly £300,000 overpaid output tax. We finally agreed the repayment with HMRC after dealing with issues such as the quantum of the claim and unjust enrichment.

    Developer

    Our property developing client specialises in very high-end residential projects in exclusive parts of London. They built a dwelling using an existing façade and part of a side elevation. We contended that it was a new build (zero rated sale and no VAT on construction costs and full input tax recovery on other costs). HMRC took the view that it was work on an existing dwelling so that 5% applied and input tax was not recoverable. After site visits, detailed plans, current and historical photograph evidence HMRC accepted the holy grail of new build. The overall cost of the project was tens of millions.

    Charity

    A charity client was supplying services to the NHS. The issue was whether they were standard rated supplies of staff or exempt medical services. We argued successfully that, despite previous rulings, the supplies were exempt, which benefited all parties. Our client was able to deregister from VAT, but not only that, we persuaded HMRC that input tax previously claimed could be kept. This was a rather pleasant surprise outcome.  We also avoided any penalties and interest so that VAT did not represent a cost to the charity in any way.  If the VAT was required to be repaid to HMRC it is likely that the charity would have been wound up.

    Shoot

    A group of friends met to shoot game as a hobby. They made financial contributions to the syndicate in order to take part. HMRC considered that this was a business activity and threatened to go back over 40 years and assess for output tax on the syndicate’s takings which amounted to many hundreds of thousands of pounds and would have meant the shoot could not continue. We appealed the decision to retrospectively register the syndicate.

    After a four-year battle HMRC settled on the steps of the Tribunal. We were able to demonstrate that the syndicate was run on a cost sharing basis and is not “an activity likely to be carried out by a private undertaking on a market, organised within a professional framework and generally performed in the interest of generating a profit.” – A happy client.

    Chemist

    We assisted a chemist client who, for unfortunate reasons, had not been able to submit proper VAT returns for a number of years.  We were able to reconstruct the VAT records which showed a repayment of circa £500,000 of VAT was due.  We successfully negotiated with HMRC and assisted with the inspection which was generated by the claim.

    The message? Never accept a HMRC decision, and seek good advice!

    VAT treatment of lost, stolen, damaged or destroyed goods

    By   24 March 2025

    Is output tax due on goods that, for various reasons, cannot be sold, or are sold at a discount?

    HMRC says that the VAT treatment depends on whether or not there was actually a supply of goods, what happened to them, who was responsible for them at the time and whether a VAT invoice was issued. The value of any supply will also need to recognise any credit given to the customer.

    So, as often is the case with the tax, the answer is: “It depends”. So, let’s look at the categories to find out:

    Lost goods

    This depends on who lost the goods.

    Sometimes a business will sell goods to a customer, but they did not receive them because they went astray. This could happen, for example, if goods are lost in the post.

    • customer is responsible for loss

    If the customer is responsible for any losses before the goods are delivered, then VAT is due on the full amount of the sale.

    • supplier responsible for loss

    If the supplier is responsible for any losses before the goods are delivered, then the way VAT is dealt with will depend on whether an invoice has been issued.

    If an invoice has been issued, output tax is due on the amount invoiced, less the value of any credit given to the customer. So, if credit has been given a full refund, no VAT will be due.

    If no invoice has been issued, there is no VAT due. This is because nothing has been supplied. It is prudent to make a note in the business records that the goods were lost an no invoice was raised.

    Stolen goods

    If goods are stolen from a business’ premises no VAT is due – as long as any customer has not been invoiced. HMRC are very likely to examine such circumstances as it is sometimes used as an ‘excuse’ for underdeclarations. Consequently, we always advise businesses to hold as much evidence as possible to support a claim that theft has taken place.

    Goods stolen from a supplier’s premises after they have been sold to a customer- If the contract with the customer means that they are responsible for the goods while they are on the supplier’s premises – there has been a supply and output tax is due.

    If the customer is not responsible for the goods when they are stolen, then if:

    • a VAT invoice issued – VAT is due on the amount invoiced (but subject to subsequent amendment to the quantum)
    • no invoice has been issued – there is no VAT due because there is no supply

    NB: If cash is stolen from a business, this does not reduce the value of output tax on any supply.

    Fraud

    If goods are lost due to fraud it can be difficult to demonstrate or evidence. To avoid paying output tax on goods lost to a fraud a business is required to:

    • report the incident to the police
    • contact HMRC and give them the case details – this will entail providing a crime or case reference number given by the police. HMRC will consider each case and advise appropriately

    Damaged goods

    Damaged goods may be sold on at a discounted price, or they might have some scrap value. Output tax is due on whatever income is received for the goods sold. If an insurer makes a payment in respect of the damage, no VAT is due on this income.

    Destroyed goods

    If goods are destroyed such that they cannot be sold, and these are handed over (or what is left of them) to the insurer, no VAT is due on the disposal. Furthermore, there is no output tax due on any money received from the insurer. HMRC will need to see evidence of the insurance claim, and details of any insurance payment, on their next inspection of the business.

    Records

    Maintaining meticulous records is crucial for VAT compliance and it is very likely that such issues will be examined closely on HMRC inspections. This is because unexpected reductions in output tax will usually trigger enquiries. Input tax claims for the original purchase of the goods will be unaffected, so any mark-up type exercise will flag up the discrepancy.

    More on illegal activities here.

    VAT Returns: A box-by-box guide

    By   10 March 2025

    VAT Basics

    Return boxes explained – what goes where? A general overview.

     

    Box 1 VAT due in the period on sales and other outputs

    The amount of VAT due on all goods and services supplied in the period covered by the return. This is output tax. The value of output tax may be affected by VAT:

    • on credit notes issued
    • when refunds are made
    • on goods taken in part-exchange
    • underdeclared or overdeclared on previous returns within certain de minimis

    VAT may also be due on supplies outside the mainstream of a business, eg:

    • fuel used for private motoring where VAT is accounted for using a scale charge
    • the sale of stocks and assets
    • goods taken out of the business for private use
    • VAT due under a reverse charge
    • supplies to staff
    • gifts of goods that cost more than £50
    • certain distance sales to Northern
    • commission received for selling something on behalf of a third-party
    • VAT shown on self-billed invoices issued by your customer
    • VAT due on imports accounted for through postponed VAT accounting

    Box 2 VAT due in the period on acquisitions of goods made in Northern Ireland from the EU 

    Since 1 January 2021, a business is only allowed to make acquisitions on goods brought into Northern Ireland from the EU. For acquisitions, the VAT due on all goods and related costs bought from VAT-registered suppliers in the EU should be included.

    Box 3 total VAT due

    Show the total VAT due, the total of boxes 1 and 2. This is the total output VAT for the period.

    Box 4 VAT reclaimed in the period on purchases and other inputs

    Show the total amount of deductible VAT charged on business purchases. This is input tax for the period.

    This will include:

    • VAT paid on imports
    • imports accounted for through postponed VAT accounting.
    • claims for bad debt relief (BDR)
    • payments on removals from a warehousing regime or a free zone
    • VAT shown on self-billed invoices issued by you
    • acquisitions of goods into Northern Ireland from the EU

    Certain VAT paid by a business should not be included in box 4, some examples here.

    Adjustments to the amount claimed may be required for

    • VAT on any credit notes received
    • certain VAT underdeclared or overdeclared on earlier returns
    • partial exemption

    Box 5 net VAT to pay or reclaim

    Deduct the smaller from the larger of values in boxes 3 and 4 and enter the difference in box 5.

    If the figure in box 3 is more than the figure in box 4, the difference is the amount payable to HMRC. If the figure in box 3 is less than the figure in box 4, HMRC will repay this.

    Box 6 total value of sales and all other outputs excluding any VAT

    Show the total VAT exclusive value of all business sales and other specific outputs. These will include:

    • zero-rated, reduced rate and exempt supplies
    • fuel scale charges
    • exports
    • distance sales to Northern Ireland which are above the distance selling threshold or, if below the threshold the overseas supplier opts to register for VAT in the UK
    • reverse charge transactions
    • supplies which are outside the scope of UK VAT (this is debateable, but HMRC require this information)
    • deposits that an invoice has been issued for
    • net value of the road fuel scale charge

    Box 7 total value of purchases and all other inputs excluding any VAT

    Show the total net value of expenditure. This will include:

    • imports
    • acquisitions of goods brought into Northern Ireland from the EU
    • reverse charge transactions
    • capital assets

    Boxes 8 and 9 only need to be completed goods cross the Northern Ireland border.

    Box 8 value of supplies of goods to the EU

    For supplies of goods and related costs, excluding any VAT, from Northern Ireland the EU made from 1 January 2021.

    Box 9 value of acquisitions of goods from the EU

    For acquisitions of goods and related costs, excluding any VAT, from the EU into Northern Ireland from 1 January 2021.

     

    NB: If a business uses one of the following schemes there may be different rules for completing some of the boxes on returns.

    • flat rate scheme
    • cash accounting
    • annual accounting
    • margin schemes for second hand goods, works of art, antiques and collectors’ items
    • payments on account.

    VAT: Time to pay guidance updated

    By   18 February 2025

    HMRC’s guidance: How to pay a debt to HMRC with a Time to Pay arrangement was updated on 17 February 2025. This covers businesses which owe a debt to the department.

    The updates cover:

    • Information about when a payment plan can be set up without contacting HMRC has been added.
    • Section ‘How we work out debt repayments’ has been removed as the information is covered in the section
    • Information to work out what businesses can afford to pay has been updated in the section ‘How we work out what you can afford to pay’.

    If a business owes VAT

    It can set up a payment plan to spread the cost of its latest VAT bill online without calling HMRC if it:

    • has missed the deadline to pay a VAT bill
    • owes £100,000 or less
    • plan to pay its debt off within the next 12 months
    • has a debt for an accounting period that started in 2023 or later
    • does not have any other payment plans or debts with HMRC
    • has filed all your tax returns

    More information here: set up a payment plan online.

    How to contact HMRC to discuss a Time to Pay arrangement

    If a business cannot pay its tax bill and needs assistance (ie; the online arrangements above are not applicable) we recommend that it should contact HMRC as soon as possible.

     

    VAT penalties and surcharges – time limits for appeals. The Excel case

    By   10 February 2025

    Latest from the courts

    The recent Xcel Consult Limited First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) case serves as a reminder on the tight time limits for appealing against VAT penalties and surcharges.

    The VAT Act 1994 Section 83G sets out a statutory time limit for bringing appeals in respect of VAT penalties and surcharges of the kind in question in this case. An appeal is to be made to the tribunal before the end of the period of 30 days beginning with the date of the document notifying the decision to which the appeal relates.

    Section 83G(6) provides that an appeal may be made after the expiry of the statutory period if the Tribunal gives permission. In deciding whether to give permission to allow the late appeal, the three-stage test set out in Maitland is applied. These tests are:

    (1) establish the length of the delay and whether it is serious and/or significant

    (2) establish the reason or reasons why the delay occurred

    (3) evaluate all the circumstances of the case, using a balancing exercise to assess the merits of the reason(s) given for the delay and the prejudice which would be caused to both parties by granting or refusing permission, and in doing so take into account “the particular importance of the need for litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost, and for statutory time limits to be respected”.

    Commentary

    Our advice is to always respond within the 30 day limit, as relying on an out of time appeal can be risky. If that is not possible, an appeal should be submitted asap to ensure that test 1) above is not a reason to reject a submission.

    VAT: Personal Liability Notices

    By   16 December 2024

    A Personal Liability Notice (PLN) can be issued by HMRC to a company’s director(s) to transfer the liability to pay VAT or a VAT penalty from the company to an individual. A PLN can also be issued to a member of an LLP.

    When a PLN is issued

    An officer or officers of a company may be personally liable to pay all or part of the company penalty where:

    • a company is liable to a penalty for a deliberate wrongdoing and
    • the wrongdoing is attributable to the deliberate action of an officer or officers of the company

    Additionally, one of the two circumstances below must also apply

    • the officer gained or attempted to gain personally from the wrongdoing, or
    • the company is insolvent or likely to become insolvent

    Any grounds for suspicion that the company may become insolvent should to be supported by evidence, for example, where there are cash flow problems, insufficient assets to cover liabilities, or evidence of phoenixism.

    An officer’s liability to pay a penalty also applies to inaccuracy penalties.

    Liable persons

    The company officers are known in HMRC guidance as “liable officers”. These include:

    • elected officers
    • managers
    • directors
    • company secretary
    • any other person managing or purporting to manage any of the company’s affairs.

    LLP officers are members.

    A PLN’s power gives HMRC the right to recover all or part of the penalty from the liable officer rather than the company/LLP itself.

    Where there is more than one deliberate wrongdoing, each deliberate wrongdoing must be considered separately for the purpose of establishing whether it should be attributed to an officer or officers.

    Wrongdoings

    There are four types of wrongdoings:

    • the issue of an invoice showing VAT by an unauthorised person
    • misuse of a product so that it attracts a higher rate of excise duty
    • the handling of goods on which payment of excise duty is outstanding
    • knowingly disposing of, or causing or permitting the disposal of, material at an unauthorised waste site

    The wrongdoing must arise from the deliberate action of an officer of the company.

    Personal gain

    Once HMRC has attributed the deliberate wrongdoing to one or more company officers it must consider whether any of the officers, by fact or implication, have gained or attempted to gain personally from the wrongdoing. It is sufficient to show that each officer has gained or attempted to gain. It will not however always be possible to establish the full extent to which each officer has gained or attempted to gain, in which case HMRC would issue the PLN based on best judgment of the amount they attempted to gain personally, eg:

    • the officer may accept that there was an actual or attempted personal gain from a deliberate wrongdoing that can be attributed to them, or
    • it may be clear from business records or the officer’s lifestyle that they gained or attempted to gain personally from the results of the deliberate wrongdoing

    Appeals

    A liable officer can appeal against

    • a decision to pursue them for all or part of the penalty assessed on the company, as set out in the PLN, including whether the penalty is attributable to them, and
    • the amount of the penalty HMRC has allocated to them
    • They cannot however appeal against a decision that they have gained or attempted to gain personally from the deliberate wrongdoing, or that the company is likely to go into liquidation

    PLNs are subject to the same procedures as company penalties.

    Legislation

    Finance Act 2008, Schedule 41: Penalties: failure to notify and certain VAT and Excise wrongdoing.