Tag Archives: vat-builders

VAT Planning: design and build

By   6 May 2025
0

Planning

The construction of a new house, and the materials used by the contractor to build it, are zero-rated. However, architect and other building professional fees, eg; surveyors, supervisors, engineers, project or construction management and consultants, are always standard rated; even in respect of a new build.

This will represent an absolute VAT cost to:

  • individuals
  • entities which will rent the house(s) after completion
  • housing associations (in some circumstances)
  • certain entities which are not in business
  • any entity which will use the building(s) for other exempt purposes
  • entities which do not sell the house(s) – so onward zero-rating is not possible
  • any entity which cannot recover all of its input tax for various reasons

Aims

If it is not possible to structure matters so that these fees can be recovered (there are a number ways to do this, but not all will be available to all parties) then advisers need to consider ways to remove the VAT charge – this may also be preferable for cashflow purposes even if full input tax recovery is possible.

VAT Planning

Design and build – the steps

  • the housebuilder creates a separately VAT registered design and build company (newco)
  • newco purchases the professional services and construction services and incurs the VAT on these (the construction element is zero-rated)
  • these supplies are incorporated into a single onward supply of zero-rated design and build services to the housebuilder (a bundle) – the professional services are a cost component of the construction
  • zero rating applies to the supply to the housebuilder as the predominant supply of the bundle is the construction of new dwellings
  • newco recovers the input tax incurred on professional fees etc, as it relates to an onward taxable supply
  • newco is in a repayment position and HMRC refunds the VAT incurred on the costs – often after a pre-cred query

It is also possible to use an independent design and build company, or engage a contractor to carry out both the design and construction elements of the project with a similar result.

Considerations

It is important to implement the planning correctly. This means that appropriate contracts must be in place, the operation is carried out on sound business principles (actual supplies are made and it is not simply the moving of money).

Arrangements

In order to evidence the proper commerciality of the structure, it is important to bear in mind that:

  • appropriate contracts are in place
  • proper invoicing is required
  • the arrangements are at arm’s length
  • a profit for newco would emphasise the commercial aspect
  • all parties’ accounts reflect the transactions
  • newco combines all of its costs (including overheads/admin etc) and supplies them to the housebuilder as part of a single package of zero-rated design and build services
  • newco acts as principal and not agent (that the professional services are not disbursements)
  • the newco and the housebuilder are not in the same VAT group
  • care should be taken if loans are required (they may compromise arm’s length and genuine commercial contentions)

HMRC’s view

In HMRC’s Internal Guidance Manual VCONST02720 it states that:

“Zero-rating the construction of buildings: services excluded from zero rating: design and build

Architectural or design services supplied as part of a design and build contract can be treated as part of the zero-rated supply of construction services.

A typical design and build contract will require the contractor to complete the design for the works and complete the construction of the works.

In such circumstances HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) sees the design element as a cost component of the construction and not as a separate supply of architectural services which would be liable to VAT at the standard rate”.

Consequently, this planning is recognised and accepted by HMRC, however, it is important that it is applied effectively so it is difficult for HMRC to challenge.

VAT Domestic Reverse Charge procedure Notice updated

By   4 March 2025
0
The Notice sets out how the Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC) makes supplies of standard or reduced rated construction services between construction or building businesses subject to the charge. This means that the recipient of the supply will be liable to account for VAT due, instead of the supplier. Consequently, the customer in the construction industry receiving the supply of construction services will be required to pay the VAT directly to HMRC rather than paying it to the supplier. It will be able to reclaim this VAT subject to the normal VAT rules. The DRC will apply throughout the supply chain up to the point where the customer receiving the supply is no longer a business that makes supplies of construction services (a so-called end user).

 

The supplies to which the DRC applies are set out here

The update includes information on recipients of DRC supplies that are not VAT registered. Broadly; if a business buys specified goods or services, it may make it liable to VAT registered on the strength of the value of the DRC. 

VAT: Roof panels are not insulation. The Greenspace case

By   2 December 2021
0

Latest from the courts

In the Upper Tribunal (UT) case of Greenspace Limited the issue was whether insulated roof panels were “energy-saving materials” per VAT Act 1994, sect 29A, Schedule 7A, group 2, items 1 and 2 and thus liable at the reduced rate of 5%. Or rather at the standard rate of 20% on the basis that they were a supply of a roof itself.

Background

The appellant supplied and installed roof panels for conservatories which comprised a layer of close-cell extruded polystyrene foam (Styrofoam) around 71mm thick. The Styrofoam was covered with a thin aluminium layer and a protective powder coating which are together around 2mm thick. The supplies were made to residential customers and the panels were fitted onto their pre-existing conservatory roofs. The Panels were slotted into place on the existing roof structure and Greenspace did not replace its customers’ existing roof framework when doing this; the struts and glazing bars that supported the previous glass or polycarbonate panels were left in place. Consequently, the Panels were not self-supporting and could only be used if the customer already had an existing conservatory roof structure.

The decision

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) decided in 2020 that the panels were not “insulation for a roof” but were a new roof in their own right, and that the appellant’s supplies did not therefore qualify for the reduced rate of VAT (unlike insulation that could be separately attached to a roof, the panels actually formed the roof).

The UT dismissed the new appeal and found that the FTT had not been obliged to compare the roof after Greenspace had installed its panels to the original roof. The frame that was retained could not itself be described as a roof, and the provision of the Thermotec panels which made the conservatory weatherproof as well as insulating it could properly be categorised as the provision of a new roof.

One of Greenspace’s grounds of appeal was that the FTT decision was vitiated by the assumption that because the panels took the form of roof coverings, they were necessarily incapable of constituting “insulation for … roofs”. The appellant argued that as this was a flawed assumption (that Greenspace’s supplies “must” be treated as something more than insulation) the decision should be set aside. This contention was rejected by the UT judge.

Commentary

A fine distinction is often required to be made to establish the correct VAT treatment of a supply. In this case a degree of semantics was required to determine whether the panels were energy-saving materials (even when they certainly saved energy). On such small things turned the assessment of £2.6 million here. It always pays to double check VAT treatments rather than making assumptions.

VAT: Land and property exemptions

By   5 August 2021
0

Further to my article on VAT: Land and property simplification and HMRC’s call for evidence the ICAEW has reiterated its call for all VAT land and property exemptions to be abolished and recommends the removal of all VAT options.

ICAEW also concludes that following the UK’s departure from the EU the government is in the best position since the introduction of VAT to thoroughly review the structure of the tax.

ICAEW also suggests that all land and property transactions should subject to VAT at either the standard rate or reduced rate, other than those relating to domestic property which should remain zero rated. This approach would remove many of the complexities of the current regime, it concludes.

Commentary

This is one area of the tax that is crying out for simplification and the case put forward by ICAEW has its merits. In my view, the Government should go further and review many complexities of the tax. As one example, the rules in respect of the sale of food products is ridiculously complex and produces odd and unexpected outcomes. Also, other exemptions would benefit from reconsideration, particularly financial services and insurance, but I suspect that the current government has a lot on its plate, much of it of its own making.

VAT: Domestic Reverse Charge for construction services from 1 March 2021

By   17 February 2021
0

A reminder

The twice delayed introduction of the Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC) for the construction industry will be introduced from the first of next month and affected businesses need to have the necessary procedures in place – as it won’t be deferred again.!

Details of the scheme here and here.

Please contact us if you have any queries.

VAT: Domestic Reverse Charge for builders – introduction delayed

By   9 September 2019
0

As you were…

The UK Government has announced that it is to delay the introduction of the VAT Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC) for construction businesses by a year after a coalition of trade bodies and organisations highlighted its potentially damaging consequences. Details of DRC here

The DRC was due to come into force from 1st October this year, but it has been announced via Revenue and Customs Brief 10 (2019): domestic reverse charge VAT for construction services – delay in implementation that it has been deferred for a year. The new implementation date will be 1 October 2020 unless there are further delays.

The move has been welcomed by all parties affected by the rules and HMRC said that it was committed to working closely with the sector to raise awareness and provide additional guidance to make sure all businesses will be ready for the new implementation date.

Invoices etc

HMRC have also recognised that some businesses have already put changes in place to anticipate the original introduction date and appreciate that it may not be possible to reverse these changes before 1 October 2019. Where “genuine errors” have occurred, HMRC has stated that it will take into account the late change in its implementation date.

 Comments

The Chief Executive of the Federation of Master Builders said “I’m pleased that the government has made this sensible and pragmatic decision to delay reverse charge VAT until a time when it will have less of a negative impact on the tens of thousands of construction companies across the UK. To plough on with the October 2019 implementation could have been disastrous given that the changes were due to be made just before the UK is expected to leave the EU, quite possibly on ‘no-deal’ terms.” The situation hasn’t been helped by the poor communication and guidance produced by HMRC. Despite the best efforts of construction trade associations to communicate the changes to their members, it’s concerning that so few employers have even heard of reverse charge VAT.”

It has been stated by certain trade bodies that more than two-thirds of construction firms had not heard of the VAT changes and of those who had, around the same number had not prepared for them. My own experience backs this up and talking to other tax people and building businesses it is clear that this is not an issue which has been publicised widely and despite accountancy firms doing their best to bring it to the attention of relevant clients and contacts, many remain unaware.

Commentary

Discussions over Brexit (obviously!) have been blamed for the situation, although there is no word about why HMRC waited until a month before the intended implication to decide to delay the DRC. A lot of work has been carried out on this matter, and changes to documentation, processing and systems have taken place which will need to be reversed before 1 October 2019. At least the delay will provide HMRC with a new chance to let affected parties know next time and gives them time to identify why so many building businesses were unaware of the reverse charge.

Whether the DRC IS introduced next year remains to be seen. To my mind, it does not deal with the major sources of tax leakage in the construction industry and, as usual, complaint business will play by the book and those that do not will find a way round the rules. To exclude labour only services appears to be a folly. Perhaps they will be amended before next year.