Latest from the courts
In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Haymarket
Media Group Limited (Haymarket) the issue was whether the sale of Teddington
TV Studios qualified as a VAT free Transfer of a Going Concern (TOGC).
Background
The site in question was subjected to an Option To Tax
(OTT) by the supplier. The sale of the property was with the benefit of planning
consent for the development of flats and houses on the site after demolition of
the TV studios.
Subject of the appeal
The transferor/vendor had previously let a small building on
the site to the purchaser’s advisers and, on this basis, the sale was structured
to be a TOGC as a property rental business. HMRC raised an assessment as it
considered that neither a property rental business, nor a property development
business had been transferred.
Decision
The appeal was dismissed. The FTT found that, despite the
short lived and minor letting, this did not constitute a business. Further,
that even if this had been a business, the contract required vacant possession
so a business could not have been continued.
The contention that a property development business was being carried on was also rejected. Despite significant costs being incurred by Haymarket in obtaining the planning permission, the intention* was always to sell the site to a developer, rather than the appellant carrying out the development itself (there was no meaningful work being carried out on the site). The fact that planning permission was obtained did not mean that there was an ongoing property development business which could be transferred.
* The importance of “intention”
in VAT is considered here
and here.
Technical
In order for a transaction to qualify for a VAT free TOGC, ALL of
the following conditions must be met:
- the
assets must be sold as a business, or part of a business, as a going concern
- the
assets must be used by the transferee in carrying on the same kind of business,
whether or not as part of any existing business, as that carried on by the
transferor in relation to that part (HMRC guidance uses the words “intend to
use…” which, in some cases may provide
additional comfort)
- there
must be no break in trading
- where
the seller is a taxable person (VAT registered) the purchaser must be a taxable
person already or immediately become, as a result of the transfer, a taxable
person
- where
only part of a business is sold it must be capable of separate operation
- there must
not be a series of immediately consecutive transfers
In this case, the first, second and third tests was failed
leaving the supply to be VAT-able as a result of the OTT.
More on the complex subject of TOGCs including case law here,
here,
here,
and here.
Commentary
TOGCs are often a minefield for taxpayers and their advisers, especially if property is involved. Not only is land law and the relevant VAT legislation complex, but property transactions are usually high value, with a lot of VAT at stake (the VAT in this case was £17 million). Additionally, they are often “one-offs” and frequently outside the usual commercial expertise of people running the business. We strongly advise that comprehensive technical advice is always obtained when TOGC is mooted by one side or the other, particularly when the relevant asset is involved in property letting or development.