HMRC has updated its guidance on applying zero-rated VAT to goods exported from the UK – VAT Notice 703.
The amendments reflect the latest legal requirements (the latest force of law) and customs processes as of 13 February 2026 and removes outdated customs terminology and guidance.
Summary
Goods exported from the UK can be zero‑rated provided they physically leave the UK and all HMRC conditions are met. Notice 703 sets out who can apply zero‑rating and the legal basis under the VAT Act 1994.
Conditions & time limits: Exporters must ensure goods are exported within specified time limits (generally within three months, but longer in some cases) and meet detailed conditions depending on whether the export is direct, indirect, or in special scenarios (eg; retailers, ships, aircraft).
Evidence & record‑keeping: Zero‑rating is only valid if acceptable proof of export is obtained and retained (such as customs declarations and commercial transport documents), with clear rules on records, customs systems, and compliance checks.
In order to zero-rate a supply, it is vitally important that exporters obtain the correct evidence that goods have physically left the UK and that all descriptions of the goods are accurate and satisfy HMRC requirements. There has been a significant amount of case law on export documentation (an example here) which illustrates that this is often an area of dispute.
A curious matter and one which brings into focus the drinking habits of people across the EU. Now, as those who know me will be aware, I am not adverse to a good single malt, nor a decent claret, but I do wonder sometimes where people draw the line.
Background
It transpires that in Lithuania people who choose not to drink, or cannot afford, even the cheapest alcoholic items have turned to drinking perfume and mouthwash which contain isopropyl alcohol. This has a similar effect on the human body to what most people would regard as being from more usual beer, wine or spirits etc. Sounds delicious eh?
Issue
The issue was whether these products where subject to Excise Duty, or, as the appellant contended, they were duty free as cosmetic products.
Decision
The AG found that isopropyl alcohol is almost unpalatable to most people. The fact that Bene Factum held out, advertised and marketed to people to drink the products did not affect the fact that the main purpose of the goods was for their use as cosmetics and mouthwash. What must be considered is Excise Duty depends on an objective classification to determine whether it is intended for human consumption. This classification is not affected by the fact that Bene Factum actively encouraged people to drink these products rather than use them for cosmetic purposes.
Consequently, the goods where not subject to Excise Duty. Good news for Lithuanian alcohol connoisseurs! It remains to see if the court follows this opinion, in most cases they do, but one never knows.
Commentary
If there is anybody out there who is getting ready for their Christmas party, looks at some cosmetic products and considers taking a swig, I make the following comments:
HMRC has published (on 28 November 2025) a collection of new guidance on postponed VAT accounting (PVA).
The guidance covers what a business needs to do if it is using PVA to account for import VAT on its VAT returns.
The publication brings together all PVA guidance, giving detailed information about:
Latest from the courts
In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of TSI Instruments Limited the issue was whether the appellant could claim import VAT when it was not the owner of the imported goods. The amount of VAT at stake was circa £8.5 million.
Background
TSI Instruments (TSI) imported scientific equipment owned by its customers for repair. The main activity of TSI in the UK is the service, repair and calibration of TSI Group goods which had previously been sold to customers around the world.
TSI is named as the importer and paid the charges made by the shipping company for dealing with the declaration and customs clearance formalities on behalf of TSI as well as paying the import VAT which it claimed.
Contentions
HMRC refused to repay the claims on the basis that only the entity with title to the goods is able to deduct the import VAT.
The appellant argued there is no requirement in the legislation that the importer should be the owner of the goods in order for import VAT to be credited. TSI asserted that, as long as the goods are imported for the purposes of its taxable business and it bears the costs of the import, the import VAT can be credited as input tax.
Decision
The FTT ruled that TSI was not entitled to claim input VAT credit for import VAT paid on goods it did not own, and the appeal was dismissed. Via both EU and UK VAT law, the right to deduct import VAT is restricted to the actual owner of the goods or the entity which has the right to dispose of the goods as their owner (or where the cost or value of the goods is reflected in the price of specific output transactions or in the price of goods and services supplied in the course of their economic activities). Since TSI did not own the goods, and their value was not included in the repair service price, the FTT ruled against TSI.
Commentary
This position could have been avoided by planning being put in place. TSI could have used Inward Processing Relief or the owner of the goods could have been the importer.
Legislation/HMRC guidance
VIT13300 – Import VAT may only be claimed by the owner of the goods who would be entitled to reclaim the import VAT either in accordance with s24 VATA 1994 (if registered for VAT in the UK) or under part XXI of the VAT Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518) if they are not registered for VAT in the UK, provided they satisfy the legislative conditions. For further information see Notice 723A.
HMRC published Revenue and Customs Briefs 2 (2019) and Brief 15 (2020) which restated HMRC’s long-standing policy that it is the owner of the imported goods who is entitled to recover the import VAT under current UK legislation. These Briefs clarify, but do not change, HMRC’s policy.
VAT Basics
A Non-Established Taxable Person (NETP) may be required to appoint a tax representative or tax agent if they make taxable supplies in the UK. The term NETP is used to describe a person who is liable to be registered for VAT under the VAT ACT 1994 Schedule 1a. A NETP must register for VAT as soon as it makes its first taxable supply in the UK, or when it expects to make taxable supplies here within the next 30 days, that is; there is no turnover limit for a NETP.
A NETP is a business which has no place of belonging in the UK. So, what is the difference between a representative and agent, and does the NETP get a choice?
Tax representative
A representative maintains the NETP’s VAT records, submits VAT returns and accounts for UK VAT on behalf of the NETP and dels with communication with HMRC. A representative is jointly and severally liable for any VAT debts incurred by the NETP.
A NETP may only appoint one person at a time to act on its behalf, although a tax representative may act for more than one NETP.
Tax agent
An agent carries out a similar role to a representative, however, the important difference is that HMRC cannot hold an agent responsible for any of NETP’s VAT debts. HMRC reserve the right not to deal with any particular agent. In some circumstances, if HMRC deem think it necessary, it will insist that a tax representative is appointed.
As long as HMRC has not directed (see below) a NETP to appoint a tax representative, it can appoint an agent to deal UK VAT affairs. Any arrangement made will be subject to whatever contractual agreement the NETP and agent decide. In some circumstances, if HMRC think it is necessary, it may still insist that a tax representative is appointed.
Distinction
The tax representative and the tax agent both act on behalf of a NETP. However, while the tax agent operates in the name of the NETP, the tax representative operates in its own name. Consequently, a tax representative is personally committed to pay HMRC and must be accredited beforehand. Contracts between representatives/agents need to be clear on this point and fees charged for this work should reflect the difference in responsibilities. Should the NETP fail to pay VAT, penalties and interest due, HMRC will collect these directly from the tax representative, so, in effect, the tax representative represents a monetary insurance for HMRC.
Direction
HMRC can direct some NETPs to appoint a tax representative who must be:
this is via VAT Act 1994, section 48(1).
HMRC may choose to require some form of security from a NETP whether or not there has been any direction regarding the appointment of a representative.
Not appointing a tax representative or agent
If a NETP does not wish to appoint a tax representative or agent, and HMRC has not directed them to appoint a tax representative, it must meet all its obligations under UK VAT law itself. This includes, inter alia:
Post Brexit
For UK businesses making overseas supplies:
Businesses established within the EU are exempted from appointing a tax representative in other Member-States (MS) as international tax assistance is compulsory within the EU (the local tax administration can request assistance from the country of establishment to recover the money directly from the business). Since Brexit, the UK became a third country, so this rule does not apply, and MS have the choice to make the appointment of a tax representative compulsory for UK businesses. Most MS have done so, the notable exception being Germany.
New guidance for registration of a NETP here.
HMRC has published Revenue and Customs Brief 4 (2025), which provides information about changes to VAT deduction on costs incurred in respect of the management of pension funds.
The Brief explains a further policy change to VAT deduction on the management of pension funds – Employers can now claim all the VAT on investment costs linked to pension funds. HMRC will no longer view investment costs as being subject to dual-use. Instead, all the associated input tax incurred will be seen as the employer’s and deductible by the employer, subject to normal deduction rule
They no longer need to split the costs with pension trustees. This was (prior to the introduction of the changes on 18 June 2025) a dual-use apportionment.
This Brief is relevant to:
Impact on partial exemption methods
Businesses may need to propose new partial exemption special method (PESM) to align their VAT recovery with the new policy.
Background
HMRC’s historic policy was that employers could recover input tax they incurred on costs relating to the administration of their occupational pension funds, but not those in relation to the asset management of investments made by the fund.
Subsequently, HMRC changed its policy to allow employers recovery of input tax incurred on investment costs, provided that the employer could show evidence that they contracted and paid for the investment services.
HMRC has said that it will publish additional guidance on the new policy by Autumn 2025.
Commentary
This is very welcome news for managers of pension funds. It provides clarity and simplification in accounting, plus, more significantly; a much-improved VAT position whereby irrecoverable input tax can be avoided.
The HMRC climbdown is originally a result of the Fiscale Eenheid PPG Holdings BV cs te Hoogezand (C-26/12) CJEU case which considered an employer’s entitlement to deduct VAT paid on services relating to the administration of defined benefit pension funds and the management of the assets of the fund..
EORI is an acronym for Economic Operator Registration & Identification.
An EORI number is assigned to importers and exporters by HMRC (EOs) and is used in the process of customs entry declarations and customs clearance for both import and export shipments moving to or from the UK.
What is the EORI number for?
An EORI number is stored both nationally and on a central EU EORI database. The information it provides is used by customs authorities to exchange information, and to share information with government departments and agencies. It is used for statistical and security purposes.
A business may need to demonstrate to HMRC that it has carried out proper due diligence in certain cases.
Who needs an EORI number?
You will require an EORI number if you are planning to import or export goods. EOs can be sole proprietors, partnerships, UK incorporated companies, registered charities, and overseas companies. However, private individuals bringing their own possessions to or from the UK do not need an EORI number. An EO does not need to be VAT registered to have an EORI number.
For VAT groups, each member who imports or exports goods needs an EORI number.
Format of the EORI number
VAT registered companies will see the EORI as an extension of their VAT number. Your VAT nine digit VAT number will be prefixed with “GB” and suffixed with “000”.
How do I apply for an EORI Number?
Non VAT registered companies can apply using this link – FORM C220
VAT registered companies can apply using this link – FORM C220A
Once completed, your form should be emailed to: eori@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk
How long will my EORI application take?
The process is straightforward and EORI applications usually take up to three working days to process.
Please contact us if you have any issues with importing or exporting.
EORI checker
Gov.uk has provided a new tool to check a business’ EORI number. (This used to be an EU resource now not available due to Brexit).
Access
Who has access to an EORI number?
The general public can access limited data, When a business is notified of its EORI number, it will be asked whether it objects to this data being published on the site.
VAT Basics
Return boxes explained – what goes where? A general overview.
Box 1 VAT due in the period on sales and other outputs
The amount of VAT due on all goods and services supplied in the period covered by the return. This is output tax. The value of output tax may be affected by VAT:
VAT may also be due on supplies outside the mainstream of a business, eg:
Box 2 VAT due in the period on acquisitions of goods made in Northern Ireland from the EU
Since 1 January 2021, a business is only allowed to make acquisitions on goods brought into Northern Ireland from the EU. For acquisitions, the VAT due on all goods and related costs bought from VAT-registered suppliers in the EU should be included.
Box 3 total VAT due
Show the total VAT due, the total of boxes 1 and 2. This is the total output VAT for the period.
Box 4 VAT reclaimed in the period on purchases and other inputs
Show the total amount of deductible VAT charged on business purchases. This is input tax for the period.
This will include:
Certain VAT paid by a business should not be included in box 4, some examples here.
Adjustments to the amount claimed may be required for
Box 5 net VAT to pay or reclaim
Deduct the smaller from the larger of values in boxes 3 and 4 and enter the difference in box 5.
If the figure in box 3 is more than the figure in box 4, the difference is the amount payable to HMRC. If the figure in box 3 is less than the figure in box 4, HMRC will repay this.
Box 6 total value of sales and all other outputs excluding any VAT
Show the total VAT exclusive value of all business sales and other specific outputs. These will include:
Box 7 total value of purchases and all other inputs excluding any VAT
Show the total net value of expenditure. This will include:
Boxes 8 and 9 only need to be completed goods cross the Northern Ireland border.
Box 8 value of supplies of goods to the EU
For supplies of goods and related costs, excluding any VAT, from Northern Ireland the EU made from 1 January 2021.
Box 9 value of acquisitions of goods from the EU
For acquisitions of goods and related costs, excluding any VAT, from the EU into Northern Ireland from 1 January 2021.
NB: If a business uses one of the following schemes there may be different rules for completing some of the boxes on returns.
HMRC have released a recorded webinar about VAT on private school fees — what you need to do, and when and how to register.
It covers: