Popcorn is standard rated. DIY popcorn – corn which is popped in a microwave is VAT free. Don’t be lazy! 🍿
Popcorn is standard rated. DIY popcorn – corn which is popped in a microwave is VAT free. Don’t be lazy! 🍿
HMRC has updated its Guidance on How to claim a repayment of import duty and VAT if you have overpaid
It sets out how to check time limits and how to claim for importers, agents, freight forwarders or express operators. It also explains how to use the Customs Declaration Service or form C285 as an individual.
It covers:
Normally the sale of the assets of a VAT registered business will be subject to VAT at the appropriate rate. A TOGC, however is the sale of a business including assets which must be treated as a matter of law, as “neither a supply of goods nor a supply of services” by virtue of meeting certain conditions. It is always the seller who is responsible for applying the correct VAT treatment and will be required to support their decision.
Where the sale meets the conditions, the supply is outside the scope of VAT and therefore VAT is not chargeable.
The word ‘business’ has the meaning set out in The VAT Act 1994, section 94 and ‘going concern’ has the meaning that at the point in time to which the description applies, the business is live or operating and has all parts and features necessary to keep it in operation, as distinct from its being only an inert aggregation of assets.
TOGC Conditions
The conditions for VAT free treatment of a TOGC:
Please note that the above list has been compiled for this article from; the legislation, HMRC guidance and case law. Specific advice must be sought.
Property transfer
The sale of a property may qualify for TOGC if the above tests are met. Usually, but not exclusively, a TOGC sale is the sale of a tenanted building when the sale is with the benefit of the existing lease(s) – (the sale of a property rental business rather than of the property itself). Another example of a property TOGC is where a property under construction is sold (a development business). As may be seen, timing with a property TOGC is of utmost importance. For example, an option to tax one day late will invalidate TOGC treatment. A guide to land and property.
What purpose do the TOGC rules serve?
The TOGC provisions are intended to simplify accounting for VAT when a business changes hands. The main purposes are to:
What if it goes wrong?
TOGC treatment is not optional. A sale is either a TOGC or it isn’t. It is a rare situation in that the VAT treatment depends on; what the purchaser’s intentions are, what the seller is told, and what the purchaser actually does. All this being outside the seller’s control.
Add VAT when TOGC treatment applies:
Often, the TOGC point can be missed, especially in complex property transactions.
The addition of VAT is sometimes considered a “safe” VAT position. However, output tax will have been charged incorrectly, which means that when the buyer claims VAT shown on the relevant invoice, this will be disallowed. This can lead to;
Sale treated as a TOGC when it is a taxable supply:
When VAT free TOGC treatment is applied to a taxable supply (possibly as one, or more of the TOGC conditions are not met) then there is a tax underdeclaration. The seller will be assessed by HMRC and penalties and interest are likely to be levied. There is then the seller’s requirement to attempt to obtain the VAT payment from the buyer. Similarly to above, this is not always straightforward or possible and it may be that the contract prohibits additional payment. There is likely to be unexpected funding issues for the buyer if (s)he does decide to make the payment.
Considering the usually high value of sales of businesses, the VAT cost of getting it wrong can be significant.
Summary
This is a complex area of the tax and an easy issue to miss when there are a considerable number of other factors to consider when a business is sold. Extensive case law (example here and changes to HMRC policy here) insists that there is often a dichotomy between a commercial interpretation of a going concern and HMRC’s view. I sometimes find that the buyer’s intentions change such that the TOGC initially applied becomes invalid when the change in the use of assets (from what was notified to the seller) actually takes place. HMRC is not always sympathetic in these situations. One of the questions I am often asked is: “How long does the buyer have to operate the business after purchase so that TOGC treatment applies?” Unsurprisingly, there is no set answer to this and HMRC do not set a specific period. My view, and it is just my view, is that an absolute minimum time is one VAT quarter.
Contracts are important in most TOGC cases, so it really pays to review them from a VAT perspective.
I very strongly advise that specialist advice is obtained in cases where a business, or property is sold. And yes, I know I would say that!
HMRC has introduced a new interactive tool which aims to help taxpayers with compliance checks.
The new free online Interactive Compliance Guidance tool can help businesses understand HMRC compliance checks. It aims to provide information and support about compliance checks (VAT inspections).
The tool provides information to help taxpayers understand:
It brings together existing compliance guidance and videos in one place, making it easier to find and navigate the appropriate information.
More on VAT inspections – How do HMRC choose which businesses to visit and what is “Connect”? here.
Recently published HM Treasury Minutes show that taxpayers’ trust in HMRC is falling. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) recommended that HMRC should work with taxpayers and their representatives to understand why trust in HMRC is falling and what it can do to quickly address the decline. Furthermore, the PAC recommended that HMRC should publish the concerns it has heard and the actions it is taking to address these, as a first step to improving trust.
HMRC agreed and the recommendation has been implemented. So, what is the plan?
The Plan
HMRC says it recognises five drivers of customer trust, being perceptions of:
HMRC uses its annual customer surveys (most recently 2024), complaints data, and focus groups to understand these perceptions in driving changes in the headline measures for different customer groups. HMRC say it places ‘great value’ on customer feedback.
Alongside good customer service, trust depends on ensuring a fair tax ecosystem by holding to account those that do not pay the correct amount of tax, in addition to other factors such as prevailing trust in government.
The aim is to continue improving levels of trust by being more supportive, creating a level playing field, and ensuring its services and processes are quicker, easier and help more customers to get their taxes right first time.
For example:
HMRC publishes the results of its annual surveys as well as a range of other customer feedback eg; via exercises like public consultation. The Exchequer Secretary has confirmed that HMRC will publish a Transformation Roadmap this summer, including the details of digital services that will mean a better experience for taxpayers.
We await signs that HMRC’s services are improving and whether that lost trust can be returned. We have significant doubts, but remain open minded.
Latest from the courts
Yet more on composite or separate supplies. As a background to the issue please see previous relevant cases here here here and here. This is the latest the seemingly endless and conflicting series of cases on whether certain supplies are multiple or single.
In the First-Tier Tribunal case (FTT) of United Carpets (Franchisor) Limited (UC) the issue was whether the appellant made a single supply of flooring and fitting or whether there were two separate supplies
Background
UC is a retailer of flooring (including carpets, underlay, vinyl and wood flooring), as well as beds. A customer who purchased flooring from the appellant was given the option to have an independent, self-employed, fitter to carry out the fitting of the purchased flooring. Each store has a pool of fitters who take on fitting work referred to them by the appellant. If the customer chooses, the fitter will attend the customer’s home to fit the flooring, as directed by the customer. The fitter is then paid by the customer for that work, with the money being received and retained, in full, by the fitter.
The fitters are self-employed and they use their own tools, and drive their own vehicles. They also have their own public liability insurance and are not covered by any of the appellant’s insurance policies. They are not paid by the UC and are not on the UC’s payroll. Since they are self-employed, the fitters have no ongoing obligations to the appellant (or vice versa) and can take on referrals as they please. The appellant does not hold any formal records for the fitters and is not aware of how much the fitters earn by way of the referrals. The rates charged by the fitters are determined by the fitters themselves.
The appellant’s Terms and Conditions of Sale included the following statements:
“The carpet fitting and delivery services provided by the Installer are supplied under a separate contract from the supply of goods to the Customer by the Company (UC). The Company is not responsible for the delivery or fitting of the Goods to the Customer.
“Full payment for the fitting services is due upon fitting payable by cash or cheque directly to the Installer. As detailed on the invoice, payment for the carpet fitting is made directly to the Installer under a separate contractual agreement between the Customer and the Installer…”
The issue
Whether the supplies of fitting services made to customers following the referral to the fitter by UC were supplies made by the self-employed carpet fitters who performed the services, or by UC as a single supply of flooring and fitting such that output tax was due from UC on both the retail sales and the fitting fees.
Contentions
HMRC determined that the appellant had incorrectly treated the supply of carpet fitting and contended that it supplied fitting services via sub-contractors and assessed the appellant for output tax on the fitting fees. HMRC further contend that the appellant made those supplies as part of a single supply, comprising both the flooring and the fitting services. Assessments were raised to recover the deemed underdeclared output tax.
UC’s position is that the self-employed fitters were completely independent, and that the fitting services do not form a single supply. Consequently, VAT was only due on the retail sales and not the fitting income.
Decision
The FTT concluded that there were two separate supplies:
After a review of the contractual documentation and the economic and commercial reality, the court was satisfied that there were three agreements:
The fitter provided services to the end consumer who was liable to pay the fitter.
Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the assessments were set aside.
A significant amount of case law was cited (a list too long to reproduce here) but included were the cases of: Secret Hotels 2 Limited v HMRC; All Answers Ltd v HMRC and Tolsma v Inspecteur der Omzetbelasting Leeuwarden which were considered and applied.
Commentary
Yet another case on the perennial composite/single supply issue. This case was more straightforward than many on this subject and the outcome was no surprise. It is essential that businesses that potentially deal with agent/principal matters or make supplies at different VAT rates consider their position. Both contracts, other documentation and the commercial reality need to be considered. We recommend that in such circumstances a review is carried out specifically to establish the proper VAT position .
I have written about the pros and cons of voluntary registration here. HMRC has now updated Notice 700/1 – Who should register for VAT. The main changes are in respect of voluntary registration and the effective date of registration (EDR) and the impact on a business in selecting the date. Furthermore, information on pre-registration activities has been updated .
Sweetened rice cakes are zero-rated, but savoury flavoured ones are VATable.
BUT… The problem area is salted rice cakes. Lightly salted cakes are considered to require further preparation before consumption (and are therefore zero-rated) whereas more heavily salted rice cakes do not and are standard rated. However, there is no guideline as to where this borderline falls .
What is cryptocurrency?
Cryptocurrency is a line of computer code that holds monetary value. Cryptocurrency is also known as digital currency and it is a form of money that is created by mathematical computations. In order for a Bitcoin transaction to take place, a verification process is needed, this is provided by millions of computer users called miners and the monitoring is called mining. Transactions are recorded in the blockchain which is public and contains records of each and every transaction that takes place. Cryptocurrency is not tangible, although they may be exchanged for traditional cash. It is a decentralised digital currency without a central bank or single administrator (which initially made it attractive) and can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer network without the need for intermediaries.
What is Bitcoin?
Bitcoin was the first popular cryptocurrency and it first appeared in 2009. The advantage of bitcoin is that it can be stored offline on the owner’s local hardware (a process called cold storage) which protects the currency from being taken by others. If a person loses access to the hardware that contains the bitcoins, the currency is lost forever, and it is estimated that as much as 23% of bitcoin has been mislaid by miners and/or investors.
Exchange between currencies and bitcoin
The VAT treatment of transactions exchanging traditional currencies for Bitcoin, or Bitcoin for currencies carried out for consideration (added by the supplier) are exempt services in a similar way to any other currency transactions via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, group 5, item 1.
Paying for goods or services using Bitcoin
Similar to any other payment method, simply using Bitcoin to obtain goods or services is outside the scope of VAT and no VAT is due on the value the Bitcoin represents. That is to say that the authorities do not consider that such a transaction is a barter.
Provision of goods or services in return for Bitcoin payment
The provision of goods or services paid for in Bitcoin are treated in a similar way as any supplied for consideration consisting of
and the value is; anything received by the supplier in consideration of that supply.
Should the consideration be in Bitcoin, there two alternatives for the conversion of foreign currencies into a main currency (although these were drafted before the introduction of Bitcoin and originally relate simply to foreign currencies)
However, as above, because Bitcoin is not administered by any bank, this may make valuation difficult. The VAT Committee of the European Commission (EC) has indicated that a potential resolution is to use Open Market Rate (OMR*) as the exchange of the virtual currency. This would be the responsibility of the supplier. This is likely to be commercially available information from the websites of the likes of; coindesk, Cryptocompare or Cointelegraph for eg.
All of the above seems logical, although confirmation provided by the VAT Committee is welcome.
* OMR is the amount for which an asset is transferred between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently, and without compulsion.
HMRC has published its annual report and accounts 2024 to 2025 on 17 July 2025.
Highlights