Tag Archives: VAT-standard-rate

VAT: Collagen beauty drinks. The Minerva Research Labs Limited case

By   21 September 2026
0
Latest from the courts
In the Minerva Research Labs Limited v HMRC [2026] UKFTT 1320 (TC) First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) case the issue was whether collagen beauty drinks are standard-rated, or zero-rated as food of a kind used for human consumption. In order to determine the correct VAT treatment, the Tribunal was required to apply a judicial ‘multifactorial test’. This meant assessing the product’s ingredients, appearance, marketing, and function to decide how an ordinary person would view the product.
Background
The appellant produces a range of collagen-based liquid supplements which are targeted at the health of skin, hair, and joints and muscles. The products are packaged in cartons containing small, single-use, mono-dose bottles. 
Minerva initially accounted for output tax on the sale of the product. However, it subsequently submitted an error-correction claim which sought a refund of circa £3.64 million on the basis that the drinks should be zero-rated food. HMRC rejected the claim, prompting Minerva’s appeal.
NB: For VAT purposes, ‘food’ includes drink.
Decision
 
The FTT acknowledged that the products provide nutritional value; supplying a notable percentage of daily protein requirements alongside energy, vitamins, and minerals, but that nutritional density does not automatically equal food. It determined that:
  • the products were held out for sale as liquid beauty products
  • they were purchased for cosmetic and anti-ageing reasons
  • they were not marketed to be eaten instead of a meal, or as a snack
  • the words ‘dose’ and ‘treatment’ appeared marketing and packaging
  • the products were labelled with precautions or warnings (that food would not)
 Consequently, the products were not food and standard rating applied. 
The appeal was therefore dismissed. 
 
Legislation
VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8, Group 1, item 1. Food of a kind used for human consumption. 
Commentary
Another case on what is food. New products seem appear on a daily basis and the products themselves and marketing of the develop at a rapid pace as a result of changes to consumer tastes and health trends. Trying to fit modern foods into 1970s definitions (when VAT was introduced) will always cause absurd, contradictory results.

This case follows on from well-know cases such as: Jaffa Cakes, Mega Marshmallows, Walkers Sensations Poppadoms, Duelfuel Nutrition, and Greggs, sausage rolls as well as flapjacks, brownies and cereal bars. If there is any doubt about whether a ‘food’ product is covered by the zero-rating, we advise that expert advice is sought (we are happy to provide it!)

A VAT Did you know?

By   27 May 2026
0

Salted nuts are standard rated, but packets of nuts which are still in their shells are VAT free.

A VAT Did you know?

By   28 August 2025
0

Popcorn is standard rated. DIY popcorn – corn which is popped in a microwave is VAT free.  Don’t be lazy! 🍿

A VAT did you know?

By   26 November 2024
0

Children’s clothes are zero-rated. These include; hats, caps, braces, belts, garters and scarves, but not earmuffs – which are standard rated even if they are for children.

A VAT Did you know?

By   20 September 2023
0

Dance classes in some EU countries are subject to different VAT rates depending on whether the dance style is considered artistic or entertainment. In the UK, belly dancing and ceroc lessons are standard rated, but ballet is exempt.

A VAT Did you know?

By   28 November 2022
0

Colouring books are zero rated unless they contain swear words, nudity or theft – in which case they are standard rated.

VAT: Are freemasons’ aims philosophical, philanthropic, or civic? The United Grand Lodge case

By   4 October 2021
0

Latest from the courts

In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) the issue was whether subscriptions paid by members of the freemasons are exempt via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, Group 9, section 31, item 1(e) “Subscriptions to trade unions, professional and other public interest bodies” which exempts membership subscriptions paid to a non-profit making organisation which has objects which are of a political, religious, patriotic, philosophical, philanthropic or civic nature.

Background

So, in this case, for the subscriptions to be exempt, freemasonry’s aims must be philosophical, philanthropic, or civic. UGLE submitted input tax claims on the basis that its subscription income was exempt and HMRC declined to make the repayments.

An organisation which has more than one main aim can still come within the exemption if those aims are all listed and described in the legislation. The fact that the organisation has other aims which are not set out in law does not mean that its services to members are not exempt provided that those other aims are not main aims. If, however, the organisation has a number of aims, all equally important, some of which are covered by the exemption, and some of which are not, then the services supplied by the organisation to its members are wholly outside the exemption.

The contentions

The respondents stated that the aims were not UGLE’s sole main aim or aims, and, even if they were, the aims were not in the public domain.

UGLE claimed that its sole main aim was philosophical in nature; or, in the alternative, the main aims, taken together, were of a philosophical, philanthropic, or civic nature and it did not have any other main aims.

Decision

The appeal was dismissed. The judge decided that the supplies made by UGLE in return for subscription payments were properly standard rated.

It was common ground that the motives of the members in joining the organisation are irrelevant.

It was accepted that since 2000 freemasonry has become more outward looking and since then has become more involved in charitable work among those, and for the benefit of those, who are not freemasons or their dependants. That said, the judge was not satisfied that the charitable works of individual freemasons, such as volunteering to give time to a local charity, were undertaken by them as freemasons rather than simply as public-spirited members of the community.

It was found that UGLE did have aims of a philosophical, philanthropic and civic nature (the promotion of all aspects of the practice of freemasonry and charity was central to UGLE’s activities). However, it was not accepted that these were UGLE’s main or primary aims. At least 48% of payments made by UGLE were to freemasons and their dependants and in the FTT’s judgment such support remained one of the main aims of freemasonry and thus of UGLE. The importance of providing support for freemasons and their dependants who are in need is a central tenet of freemasonry – The duty to help other freemasons is clearly set out in the objects of the four central masonic charities. The evidence showed that the provision of relief to freemasons and their dependants was the more important than donations to good causes unconnected with freemasonry.

Civic aims

There was nothing in the evidence which indicates any civic aim. UGLE cannot be said to be an organisation that has aims pertaining to the citizen and the state. Indeed, freemasons are prohibited from discussing matters of religion and politics in lodges.

Consequently, as one of UGLE’s main aims could not be described as philosophical, philanthropic, or civic, its membership subscriptions were standard rated. Making payments to freemasons was more akin to self-insurance, rather than philanthropic in nature.