Tag Archives: VAT-groups

Should I form a VAT Group? Pros and Cons

By   17 February 2026
0
VAT Grouping

This is a very concise summary of matters that should be considered when deciding to form or disband a VAT. Grouping is optional although HMRC have powers to refuse an application in any case where it is necessary for the protection of the revenue.

What is a VAT group?

VAT grouping is a facilitation measure by which two or more entities can be treated as a single taxable person (a single VAT registration) for VAT purposes. The measure was once restricted to “Bodies Corporate” which includes; companies of all types and limited liability partnerships. However, from 1 November 2019, grouping is additionally available for all entities, including; partnerships, sole traders and Trusts in certain cases.

It is important to recognise the difference between a corporate group and a VAT group – these are two different things and it should not be assumed that a corporate group is automatically a VAT group.

It is worth remembering that it is possible to VAT group where no taxable supplies are made outside the group.

Pros

  • only one VAT return per quarter – less administration
  • the representative member accounts for any tax due on supplies made by the group to third parties outside the group. This is particularly helpful if accounting is centralised
  • no VAT on supplies between VAT group members. No need to invoice etc or recognise supplies on VAT returns
  • usually improves the partial exemption position if exempt supplies are made between group companies
  • may improve input tax recovery if taxable supplies are made to a partly exempt group company
  • if assets are hived up or down into a group company before a company sale to a non-grouped third party, the VAT consequences of the intra-group movement may be ignored
  • may provide useful planning opportunities/convenience at a later date
  • sales invoices issued, or purchase invoices received, in the wrong company name would not require time-consuming amendment
  • there may be cashflow benefits in respect of intra-group charges
  • reduced chance of penalties on intra-group charges

Cons

  • all members of the group are jointly and severally liable for any VAT due
  • former VAT group members are also liable for any VAT debts due during the period of VAT group membership
  • only one partial exemption de-minimis limit for group – which decreases the ability to fully recover input tax
  • obtaining all relevant data to complete one return may take time thus possibly missing filing deadlines
  • a new VAT number is issued (previous ones are cancelled – which may lead to administration etc issues)
  • the representative member needs all of the necessary information to submit a VAT return for the group by the due date
  • via anti-avoidance provisions, assessments can be raised on the representative member relating to earlier periods when it was not the representative member and even when it was not a member of the group at that time
  • the limit for voluntary disclosures of errors on past returns applies to the group as a whole (rather than each company having its own limit)
  • the payments on account (POA) limits apply to the group as a whole. This applies to a business whose VAT liability is more than £2 million pa. This adversely affects a business’s cashflow
  • the cash accounting limit of £1,350,000 applies to the group as a whole (rather than each company having its own limit)
  • Transfers of Going Concerns (TOGCs) acquired by a partly exempt VAT group may result in an irrecoverable VAT charge as a result of a deemed self-supply
  • an option to tax made by a VAT group member is binding on all present and future members of the VAT group. This is so even after a company has left the VAT group

We strongly recommend that professional advice is taken when a business is either considering forming a VAT group, or when thought is being given to disbanding one. Making the wrong decision could be very expensive indeed.  Specific matters that dictate VAT advice are when:

  • property is involved
  • inter-company charges are made
  • TOGCs are involved
  • costs in respect of restructuring are incurred (a current hot potato in the courts)
  • there is an international aspect to a group
  • a reverse charge applies
  • a company has been involved in the penalty regime
  • companies become insolvent
  • a VAT group is subject to POA
  • a company, or the VAT group, makes exempt supplies.

We are always happy to advise when required.

Common VAT mistakes

By   2 October 2025
0

VAT basics

None of us are perfect, and any business can make mistakes with VAT despite all intentions to take reasonable care. So what are the most common errors? Here’s a list of pitfalls to avoid:

Wrong rate of output tax charged

Land and property transactions

  • Misunderstanding the correct VAT treatment of a land and property transactions
  • Not recognising VAT issues
  • Issues with the Option To Tax
  • TOGC issues
  • A guide to triggerpoints here

Cross-border issues

  • Failing to meet the requirements to zero-rate exports
  • Incorrect import procedures
  • Ignoring the reverse charge

Inter-company charges

Partial exemption

Business entertainment

  • Different rules apply to the recovery of input tax on entertaining depending on the type of recipient, eg: clients, contacts, staff, partners and directors depending on the circumstances

Registration

VAT groups

  • Failing to VAT group when beneficial or failing to disband
  • Recovery of input tax
  • Timing of transactions
  • Partial exemption issues

Tax points (Time Of Supply)

  • Failing to recognise a tax point for output tax
  • Incorrect treatment of deposits
  • Incorrect treatment of forfeit deposits
  • Recovery of input tax at incorrect time

Bad Debt Relief issues

  • Failing to claim Bad Debt Relief
  • Failing to repay a claim to HMRC when payment from customer is received
  • Failing to repay input tax when a supplier is not paid (after six months)

Overseas issues

Claiming input tax without the correct documentation

  • A guide to alternative evidence here

Recovering irreclaimable input tax

  • A guide to what VAT is not claimable here

Return errors

  • A box-by-box guide here

Business promotion schemes

Composite or separate supplies

Changes to a business

  • Selling new products, acquisitions, share sales, disposals, re-structuring, and ceasing to trade can all have a VAT impact and this can be missed

Fuel and motoring costs

Special schemes

One-off transactions

  • Failing to recognise VAT issues of unusual or one-off transactions

Non-business (NB) and charitable activities

  • Failure to recognise NB activities
  • Failure to restrict input tax in connection with NB activities

Errors can lead to draconian penalties, and ignorance is not a defence.

A guide to VAT triggerpoints here .

Tax points and VAT groups – The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd CoA case

By   11 April 2024
0

Latest from the courts

In the The Prudential Assurance Company Limited (Pru) Court of Appeal (CoA) case the issues were the “difficult” questions in respect of the relationship between the VAT grouping rules and the time of supply (tax point) legislation. Is VAT is applicable on a continuous supply of services where these services were supplied while the companies were VAT grouped, but invoices were issued after the supplier left the VAT group?

Background

Pru was at the relevant time carrying on with-profits life and insurance business. Silverfleet Capital Limited (Silverfleet) provided Pru with investment management services. Under an agreement dated 30 August 2002, the consideration which Silverfleet received for its services comprised a management fee calculated by reference to the amount of investments made during the period in which services were provided and performance fees, payable in the event that the performance of certain funds exceeded a set benchmark rate of return.

When Silverfleet was rendering its investment management services, Pru was the representative member of a VAT group of which Silverfleet was also a member. However, in 2007 a management buy-out was effected, as a result of which Silverfleet ceased to be a member of Pru’s VAT group. It also ceased to provide management services to Pru.

During 2014 and 2015, the hurdle rate set under the 2002 agreement was passed. Silverfleet accordingly invoiced Prudential at various dates between 2015 and 2016 for fees totalling £9,330,805.92 (“the Performance Fees”) plus VAT at 20%.

The Issues

The CoA considered whether the Performance Fees are subject to VAT.

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) decided the point in favour of Pru. However, HMRC succeeded in an appeal to the Upper Tribunal (UT). In a decision that decision, the UT concluded that VAT was chargeable on the Performance Fees.

In its decision, the FTT queried whether regulation 90 of the VAT Regulations went so far as to direct that Silverfleet’s services had not been provided within a VAT group and had been “supplied in the course or furtherance of a business that in the VAT group world was not being carried on”. Further, the FTT was “unable to see what feature distinguishes [Prudential’s] case from that of the taxpayer in [B J Rice & Associates v Customs and Excise Commissioners]”.

In contrast, the UT considered that, pursuant to regulation 90 of the VAT Regulations, Silverfleet’s services were to be treated as having been supplied when invoiced and, hence, at a time when Silverfleet and Prudential were no longer members of the same VAT group. That being so, section 43 of VATA 1994 was not, in the UT’s view, in point. The UT also considered that the FTT had erred in regarding itself as bound by B J Rice & Associates v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1996] STC 581 (“B J Rice”) to allow the appeal. Unlike Mr Rice, the UT said in its decision, Silverfleet “was not entirely outside the scope of VAT when the Services were rendered, but rather it was subject to a specific set of assumptions and disregards”.

Pru contended that Silverfleet should not be considered to have made the supply in the course or furtherance of any business carried on by it. The business will instead be assumed to have been carried on by Pru. This was important because if VAT was applicable to the services Pru would not be in a position to recover it (in full at least) due to partial exemption which represented a large VAT cost.

Unsurprisingly, HMRC considered that output tax was due because at the tax point, Silverfleet as no longer part of the VAT group. 

Legislation

The VAT Act 1994, section 43 lays down the rules in respect of VAT groups, and The VAT Regulations 1995, regulation 90 makes provision with respect to the time at which continuous supplies of services are to be treated as supplied for VAT purposes.

Section 43 explains that any supply by one member of a VAT group to another is to be “disregarded” and that “any business carried on by a member of the group shall be treated as carried on by the representative member”. Does this mean that no VAT is chargeable on an intra-group supply regardless of whether the supplier has left the group by the time consideration for the supply is the subject of a VAT invoice and paid? Or is section 43 inapplicable in respect of continuous supplies insofar as the consideration is invoiced and received only after the supplier is no longer a member of the VAT group because regulation 90 provides for the services to be treated as supplied at the time of the invoice or payment?

Decision

The appeal was dismissed and HMTC’s assessment was upheld. It was not possible to disregard the supply as intra-group and the tax point rules for the continuous supply of services meant that it was a taxable supply. The decision was not unanimous, with the decision by the judges being a 2:1 majority.

Commentary

This was a close decision and highlights the necessity of considering the interaction between VAT groups and tax points and the implications of timings. The case makes interesting reading in full (well, for VAT people anyway!) for the technical discussions and the disagreement between the judges.