Latest from the courts.
The rolls used in Subway’s hot sandwiches are not bread. According to a recent ruling by Ireland’s Supreme Court, because of the high level of sugar in the rolls, they cannot be taxed as bread, so the VAT zero rate cannot apply.
Further to my recent article on the Border Operating Model, we now know what Tariffs the UK will apply.
Currently, goods are able to move from country to country inside the EU completely Tariff free. This means that there is no need for import and export formalities which add delays and red tape. Unfortunately, as a result of Brexit, from 1 January 2021, EU/UK trade will be subject to Tariffs as the UK will be a “third country” (third country refers to any country outside the EU, and in this case outside its economic structures – the single market and the customs union).
Commercially, Tariffs add to the cost of importing goods into the UK by UK businesses and increase the price of exports to overseas customers. It is not possible to reclaim the cost of Tariffs (unlike VAT) so these will always represent a real cost to a buyer. The government has now announced what the UK Tariffs will be here.
Overview
The UK has broadly retained the existing Tariff for goods brought into the EU from third countries. However, there are some changes for; important industrial components (nuts, bolts, tubes and screws etc) some consumer products, the removal of Tariffs below 2% and the rounding of Tariffs with a decimal point.
Action
Businesses should review their exposure to these tariffs and what the related customs duty burden will be. They will also need to consider; budgets, pricing and alternative business structures – which may include manufacturing in the EU rather than the UK. We also recommend reviewing Commodity Codes, values for Customs Duties and the origin of the goods. Please also note that the use of incoterms will become increasingly important.
This month the government have issued new guidance: The Border with the European Union Importing and Exporting Goods on the Border Operating Model. This provides comprehensive guidance on the movement of goods from 1 January 2021 and adds to previous guidance.
This is important information for any business moving goods between GB, the EU and NI and needs to be considered for tax planning and general preparation for Brexit. These rules will likely come into force regardless of whether the UK has negotiated an agreement with the EU.
The introduction comes in three stages:
Stage One
Business will need to:
Stage Two
If businesses are importing Products of Animal Origin (POAO) or a regulated plant and plant product; they will need to:
Stage Three
Businesses must:
General
From 1 January 2021
Businesses will need to review their processes for dealing with cross-border goods, both between the EU and Northern Ireland. This includes; customs declarations, compliance, provision of data, obtaining a duty deferment account and GB/EU EORI numbers as necessary. We also advise liaising with suppliers and customers to ensure, as far as possible, that transactions are as seamless as possible in these challenging times.
1. Am I sure that a VAT inspection would not find any errors?
2. Am I sure that I am reclaiming as much VAT as possible?
3. Do I take full advantage all available VAT reliefs, customs exemptions and duty refund schemes?
4. Am I up to date on the indirect tax developments in my key markets?
5. Have I considered the impact of tax rate changes on my pricing and margin, and have I taken the necessary measures?
6. Do I collect all the data about my customers and transactions that could be required by tax authorities?
7. Do I comply with all indirect tax requirements in the jurisdictions where I operate or where my customers belong?
8. Do I have the tools to analyse my indirect tax flows and data?
9. Could changes in the way my business is structured or how transactions are organised improve my indirect tax position and/or reduce complexity?
10. Is my business using the right VAT scheme?
It is important to constantly monitor a business’ VAT position. The nature of trade changes, technology changes, case law changes and the VAT rules are constantly in a state of flux. It is easy to assume that everything is alright because it has always been done that way, but there may be significant exposures and missed opportunities out there. Things will also change once the terms of Brexit have been agreed (or not). We offer services from a basic healthcheck to a full technical review. A review will let you rest easy in your bed if nothing else!
The European Commission (EC) has published an updated Notice to Stakeholders which covers the UK leaving the EU.
The original document which was published in 2018 has been amended to reflect the latest developments which mainly include the official Brexit on 1 February 2020 and the current transition period, which, as matters stand, will end on 31 December 2020. Until that date, EU law in its entirety applies to the UK
The Notice includes:
The Notice states that; “…during the transition period, the EU and the UK will negotiate an agreement on a new partnership, providing notably for a free trade area. However, it is not certain whether such an agreement will be concluded and will enter into force at the end of the transition period”. I think that this is likely to be a charitable conclusion!
The EC advises businesses:
The Notice does not cover the supply of goods nor digital services themself.
General
After the end of the transition period, the EU rules on VAT for services no longer apply to, and in, the UK. This has, particular consequences for the treatment of taxable transactions in services and VAT.
Businesses need to understand the probable changes and make preparations for a No-Deal Brexit.
Correcting errors on your VAT Return
HMRC have announced that, due to coronavirus, it will no longer be accepting paper copies of VAT652s by post.
If an error is discovered on a past VAT return it is necessary to report it to HMRC on form VAT652 if it is £10,000 (net of all errors) or more of VAT. More details here
A business must now email its VAT652 form to:
inbox.btcnevaterrorcorrection@hmrc.gov.uk
Telephone
A business can call to check HMRC has received its error correction notification if it has not had an acknowledgement after 21 days.
Errors cannot be corrected over the phone.
Telephone: 0300 200 3700
This is said to be a temporary measure, but I cannot see why HMRC would revert to a paper based system when the virus poses less of a threat.
Remember: stay in!
The Government is consulting on plans to create up to ten freeports. Freeports may provide tariff flexibility, customs facilitations and tax measures designed to encourage global trade and attract inward investment post-Brexit. The proposed Freeports will have different customs rules to the rest of the country.
What is a Freeport?
Freeports are secure customs zones located at ports where business can be carried out inside a country’s land border, but where different customs rules apply. The paper says that Freeports may:
Typically, goods brought into a Freeport do not attract a requirement to pay duties until they leave the Freeport and enter the domestic market. No duty at all is payable the goods are re-exported. If raw materials are brought into a Freeport from overseas and processed into a final good before entering the domestic market, then duties will be paid on the final good.
Government aims
It is stated that the government wants Freeports to boost trade, jobs and investment. They say that is why they are proposing cutting red tape by streamlining customs processes, exploring the use of planning measures to speed up planning processes and accelerate development and housing delivery in and around Freeports, and consulting on a comprehensive set of tax breaks to support businesses. Of course, all this would be unnecessary if Brexit had not have occurred.
Deadline
The consultation deadline is 20 April 2020 so there is not a lot of time to make your views known.
Latest from the courts
In the Virgin Media Ltd First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case a number of issues were considered. These were:
Background
Virgin Media Limited (VML) provided cable TV, broadband and telephone services (media services) to members of the public. It was the representative member of a VAT Group which also contained Virgin Media Payment Limited (VMPL).
If customers choose not to pay by direct debit, they were required to pay a £5 “handling charge”. The handling charge was paid to VMPL and passed to VML on a daily basis. The issue was; what was the correct VAT treatment of the charge?
Contentions
The appellant argued that the £5 charge was optional for the customer and the collection of it was carried out by VMPL and was exempt as the transfer or receipt of, or any dealing with, money. Further, that, despite being members of the same VAT group, there was nothing in the legislation which forced the VAT group to treat supplies by separate entities within that group as a single supply to a recipient outside the group.
HMRC contended that there was a single taxable supply and thus no exempt services were provided and, in fact, VMPL was not making a supply at all (and therefore not to VML as the group representative member). In the first alternative, if it were decided that there was a supply, such a supply was an ancillary component of a single taxable supply by VML as representative group member and not by VMPL as per the Card Protection Plan case. In the second alternative, if both decisions above went against HMRC, that the service provided by VMPL fell outside the exemption so that it was taxable in its own right.
Decision
It was found that:
Therefore, the appeal was dismissed and a reference to the CJEU was considered inappropriate and output tax was due on the full amount received by the group from customers.
Summary
This was a complex case which suffered significant delays. It does help clarify a number of interconnected issues and demonstrates the amount of care required when planning company structures and the VAT analysis of them.
What is the Default Surcharge?
Default Surcharge is a civil penalty to “encourage” businesses to submit their VAT returns and pay the tax due on time the charge is introduced via VATA 1994 s 59(A).
When will a Default Surcharge be issued?
A business is in default if it sends in its VAT return and or the VAT due late. No surcharge is issued the first time a business is late but a warning – a Surcharge Liability Notice (SLN) is issued. Subsequent defaults within the following twelve months – the “surcharge period” may result in a surcharge assessment. Each time that a default occurs the surcharge period will be extended. There is no liability to a surcharge if a nil or repayment return is submitted late, or the VAT due is paid on time but the return is submitted late (although a default is still recorded).
How much is the surcharge?
The surcharge is calculated as a percentage of the VAT that is unpaid at the due date. If no return is submitted the amount of VAT due will be assessed and the surcharge based on that amount. The rates are:
A surcharge assessment is not issued at the 2% and 5% rates if it is calculated at less than £200 but a default is still recorded and the surcharge period extended. At the 10% and 15% the surcharge will be the greater of the calculated amount or £30.
Specific issues
The default surcharge can be particularly swingeing for a fast-growing company. Let’s say that a small company grows quickly. In the early days the administration was rather haphazard, as is often the case, and a number of returns and payments were submitted late. Fast forward and the turnover, and the VAT payable, has grown significantly. Being late at this time means that the amount of default surcharge is considerably higher than when the original default which created the surcharge took place. This leads us onto whether the surcharge is proportionate.
A business with cashflow difficulties may well ask whether it should be penalised by HMRC for having those difficulties; which of course will add to the problem.
Proportionality
The existing, long-standing default surcharge regime has always had issues with the principle of proportionality. The regime has regularly been challenged in the Courts.
Is it proportionate that a same penalty is applied for a payment which is one day late and one which is one year late? This is a matter which has concerned both HMRC and the Courts for a number of years.
In the Upper Tribunal case of Total Technology (Engineering) Ltd the Judge concluded that it was possible for an individual surcharge to be disproportionate, but that the system as a whole was not fundamentally flawed. It is also worth noting that in In Equoland judgment the judge stated that a penalty which is automatic and does not take into account the circumstances is at the least tending towards being disproportionate.
Disagreement over a surcharge
If you disagree with a decision that you are liable to surcharge or how the amount of surcharge has been calculated, it is possible to:
If you ask for a review of a case, a business will be required to write to HMRC within 30 days of the date the Surcharge Liability Notice Extension was sent. The letter should give the reasons why you disagree with the decision.
Defence against a surcharge
In order to have a surcharge withdrawn (it cannot be reduced, as it is one of the few penalties that cannot be mitigated in any circumstances) it is necessary to demonstrate that a business had a reasonable excuse for the default. This is a subject of an article on its own. Certain factors, like relaying on a third party are not accepted as a reasonable excuse. HMRC state that a business will not be in default if they, or the independent tribunal, agree that there is a reasonable excuse for failing to submit a VAT Return and/or payment on time.
There is no legal definition of reasonable excuse but HMRC will look closely at the circumstances that led to the default.
If the circumstance that led to the default were unforeseen and inescapable and a business is able to show that its conduct was that of a conscientious person who accepted the need to comply with VAT requirements, then it may amount to a reasonable excuse.
What sort of circumstances might count as reasonable excuse?
HMRC provide guidelines on circumstances where there might be a reasonable excuse for failing to submit a VAT Return and/or payment on time. These include:
Ongoing issues
HMRC is considering whether and how it should differentiate between those who deliberately and persistently fail to meet administrative deadlines or to pay what they should on time, and those who make occasional and genuine errors for which other responses might be more appropriate. This has been a lengthy process to date.
A previous HMRC document highlighted two issues with the current VAT default surcharge regime.
It is possible that in the future we may hear proposals for the system being amended. if this is the case, I think we can anticipate the introduction of mitigation and suspension.
Issue an incorrect certificate to obtain zero rated building work at your peril! Don’t get caught out – A warning.
In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Westow Cricket Club (WCC) the appeal was against a penalty levied by HMRC for issuing a certificate to a contractor erroneously under The VAT Act 1994, Section 62 (1).
Background
WCC was an entity run by volunteers but was not a charity, although it was a Community Amateur Sports Club (“CASC”). It decided to build a new pavilion and wished to take advantage of certain zero rating which was available for the construction of a building that the
“…organisation (in conjunction with any other organisation where applicable) will use the building, or the part of the building, for which zero-rating is being sought …..solely for
a relevant charitable purpose, namely by a charity in either or both of the following ways:
….(b) As a village hall or similarly in providing social or recreational facilities for a local community.”
– Public Notice 708 para 14.7.1.
To ensure that the issue of such a certificate was appropriate, the appellant wrote to HMRC giving details about the building project and seeking guidance on the zero rating of supplies to WCC in the course of the construction of the pavilion. The response was important in this case as WCC sought to rely on it as a reasonable excuse. Part or the reply stated:
“HM Revenue & Customs policy prevents this Department from providing a definitive response where we believe that the point is covered by our Public Notices or other published guidance, which, in this case, I believe it is. In view of the above, please refer to section 16 of Public Notice 708 Buildings and construction. This explains when you can issue a certificate. Section 17 includes the certificates. Furthermore, I would refer you to sub-paragraph 14.7.4 which covers what is classed as a village hall or similar building. Providing the new pavilion meets the conditions set out, and it appears to do so, the construction work will be zero-rated for VAT purposes…”
Decision
Regrettably, the FTT found that, despite HMRC’s letter expressing a ‘non definitive’ view; which was wrong, this was insufficient to provide reasonable excuse and could not be relied upon. The FTT made references to the fact that the club was not a charity and could not therefore issue the certificate. Consequently, the 100% penalty was applicable and not disproportionate (the penalty imposed is nothing more than the VAT that would have been paid by any other CASC seeking to build a pavilion incurring a vatable supply of a similar sum).
Commentary
HMRC was criticised for potentially leaving taxpayers in ‘no man’s land’ by expressing a view whilst at the same time saying that this was not a definitive response. This is a common tactic used by HMRC and one which many commentators, including myself, have criticised.
Tribunal’s unease
The judge commented that he trusted that HMRC will take note of his concerns and if this is a matter of policy to revisit it in light of the comments made in this decision. Let us hope HMRC listens. It is also an important case for charities (and others) to note when considering if they are able to obtain the construction of buildings VAT free. This is not a straightforward area, and the penalty for getting it wrong is clearly demonstrated here.
Always get proper advice – and don’t rely on vague rulings from HMRC!