Category Archives: Law

VAT: Removal of linked goods concession

By   20 January 2026
0

HMRC has published Revenue and Customs Brief 1 (2026): Removal of the linked goods concession

This brief confirms that the Extra Statutory Concession (ESC) described in paragraph 3.7 of Notice 48 is no longer required. HMRC considers that the supplies previously eligible to be treated as single supplies under the concession should be treated as single supplies under the legislation, as confirmed by existing case law.

Examples of such cases: here, here here here and here. 

Businesses should now refer to HMRC’s policy as described in VATSC11113 – Supply: Single and multiple supplies: HMRC’s approach: The general approach.

Note

A VAT ESC is a formal relaxation by HMRC permitting a tax treatment not strictly permitted by law, to resolve minor anomalies, prevent hardship, or simplify administration. These provide businesses relief they would not otherwise get, but it has no legal force and isn’t for tax avoidance.

VAT: Partial exemption input tax attribution. The Littlewoods case

By   13 January 2026
0
Latest from the courts
 
In the Littlewoods Limited First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case the issue was the ability to recover input tax incurred on photography costs.
Background
Littlewoods used photographers for the creation of product specific photographs for use in catalogues and in connection with its online retail store. It made claims to recover this input tax, but HMRC refused a full refund. This appeal was against that decision.
The appellant is partly exempt. It makes taxable sales of goods and also makes exempt supplies of finance and insurance. This means that it is unable to recover all input tax it incurs.
Contentions
 
The appellant argued that the photography costs were directly attributable to the sale of the products photographed and was consequently fully recoverable.
HMRC contended that not all of the VAT was claimable because an element was referable to the exempt supplies (ie: the input tax was incurred to support both the online taxable sale of goods and of exempt finance). Therefore, an apportionment was required.
Decision
 
The appeal was allowed.
 
The Tribunal considered that each use made of the photographs to be exclusively in the making of taxable supplies of retail goods. Any link to credit or insurance was, in its view, at the most, indirect but, given the nature of the costs, probably non-existent. Consequently, the photography did not promote any finance or insurance products so that no restriction of the input tax claims was required.
Commentary
Yet another case on input tax attribution. As someone once said; partial exemption is more of an art than a science…
The judge distinguished this appeal from the N Brown case as the circumstances were different and that the court applied the wrong legal test in terms of the micro/macro level of business per the Royal Opera House case.

VAT treatment of the supply of locum doctors

By   16 December 2025
0

HMRC has issued Revenue and Customs brief 9 (2025)  which covers the VAT liability of the supply of temporary medical staff (locum doctors).

This change to HMRC’s previous view (that these supplies were taxable) is a consequence of the First-Tier Tribunal’s decision in Isle of Wight NHS Trust case which ruled in favour of the Trust, finding that the supply of locums is an exempt service. 

The Brief also provides guidance for businesses who wish to claim a refund of overdeclared output tax following the decision.

VAT Grouping: Protection of the Revenue

By   9 December 2025
0
The salient amendments are to the references to ‘protection of the revenue’ and ‘Revenue loss’.
VAT grouping is a facilitation measure by which two or more entities can be treated as a single taxable person (a single VAT registration) for VAT purposes. The measure was once restricted to “Bodies Corporate” which includes; companies of all types and limited liability partnerships. However, from 1 November 2019, grouping is additionally available for all entities, including; partnerships, sole traders and Trusts in certain cases.
HMRC has the vires to refuse an application for a VAT group, or remove a member if HMRC consider that it may lead to a VAT loss.

The Change

“The definition of ‘protection of the revenue’

Where this is considered necessary for the protection of the revenue, the VAT grouping legislation gives HMRC the power to:

  • prevent a person joining a VAT group
  • remove an existing member from a VAT group

We usually will not use our protection of the revenue powers if the revenue loss follows from the normal operation of grouping. If we feel that the revenue loss does not follow the normal operation of grouping, then we would consider using our protection of the revenue powers, such as:

  • where we identify enhanced risks to the collection of revenue
  • the use of VAT avoidance and distortion in the liability of the group’s supplies

In this context, ‘revenue loss’ means the VAT that is not charged when one company in a group sells to another company in the same group. This usually happens when one or more companies in the VAT group cannot reclaim all the VAT they pay because they make supplies that are exempt from VAT.

We will use our revenue protection powers if it looks like the main reason for VAT grouping someone is to ignore supplies from that company’s overseas branches to other members of the VAT group.

This applies whether that person is established in the UK or has a UK fixed establishment”.

VAT and the 2025 Budget

By   27 November 2025
0
Budget 26 November 2025
There was not too much excitement in the budget for indirect taxes (there was no change to the registration threshold, nor any VAT rates), but there were some minor changes.
VAT Grouping
The rules relating to cross border VAT grouping will be clarified. From the Budget date of 26 November 2025′ the UK will revert to its previous position on grouping to restore the “whole establishment” principle. HMRC also published Revenue and Customs Brief 7 (2025): Revised VAT grouping rules and the Skandia judgment, confirming that HMRC now considers that an overseas establishment of a business VAT grouped in the UK should be treated as part of that VAT group, even when located in an EU member state that does not operate whole entity VAT grouping.
This means that services provided between a UK head office and its overseas branch will once again be disregarded for VAT purposes, even if the branch belongs to a VAT group in another jurisdiction. 
HMRC acknowledges that some VAT groups may have accounted for VAT in line with the previous guidance and may now be eligible to reclaim overpaid VAT through the error correction notification procedure.
This HMRC brief provides more details.  

Private hire vehicles

Suppliers of private hire vehicle and taxi services will be excluded from the scope of the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) from 2 January 2026, except where these are supplied in conjunction with certain other travel services. The government also published a response to the Consultation on the VAT Treatment of Private Hire Vehicles and HMRC published Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2025): VAT Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme — supplies by private hire vehicle or taxi operators, which explains how to account for VAT as a private hire vehicle operator, a taxi operator, or business re-selling such supplies.

E-invoicing 

The government will require all VAT invoices to be issued in a specified electronic format from April 2029. An implementation roadmap will be published at Budget 2026 further to consultation with businesses. 

VAT treatment of business donations of goods to charity

There will be a new VAT relief to be be introduced on 1 April 2026 for business donations of goods to charity for distribution to those in need or use in the delivery of their charitable services, ie; in addition to goods donated for sale. HMRC also published a response to the Consultation on the VAT treatment of business donations of goods to charity, and a policy paper, VAT relief for business donations on goods to charities. The relief will apply to goods valued up to £100 per item, with a higher £200 threshold for essential electrical items to help tackle digital poverty. Eligibility is strictly limited to registered charities, meaning community interest companies (CICs) and social enterprises are excluded unless they register as charities. This corrects an anomaly where there is no VAT liability when businesses dispose of goods to landfill, but may incur one when donating those same goods to charity. 

Motability

From 1 July 2026, vehicles leased through the Motability Scheme will be subject to 20% VAT on top-up payments for more expensive vehicles which are made in addition to the transfer of eligible welfare payments for more expensive vehicles on the scheme. The standard rate of Insurance Premium Tax will apply to scheme insurance contracts: VAT and Insurance Premium Tax: change to reliefs for qualifying motor vehicle leasing schemes – GOV.UK There will be no changes to vehicles designed for, or substantially and permanently adapted for, wheelchair or stretcher users. 

ATCS

The Government has confirmed that the ‘Advance Tax Certainty Service’ (ATCS) will launch in July 2026 and provide clearances on corporation tax, stamp taxes, VAT, PAYE and the construction industry scheme, where there is no existing statutory route to certainty.

Charities and VAT – A Guide

By   18 November 2025
0

Surely charities don’t have to pay taxes?

This is a common myth, and while charities and Not-For-Profit entities (NFPs) do enjoy some VAT reliefs, they are also liable for a number of VAT charges.

Charities have a very hard time of it in terms of VAT, since not only do they have to contend with complex legislation and accounting (which other businesses, no matter how large or complicated do not) but VAT represents a real and significant cost.

By their very nature, charities carry out “non-business” activities which means that VAT is not recoverable on the expenses of carrying out these activities.  Additionally, many charities are involved in exempt supplies, eg; fundraising events, property letting, and certain welfare and educational services, which also means a restriction on the ability to recover VAT on attributable costs.

These two elements are distinct and require separate calculations which are often very convoluted.  The result of this is that charities bear an unfair burden of VAT, especially so since the sector carries out important work in respect of; health and welfare, poverty, education and housing etc.  Although there are some specific reliefs available to charities, these are very limited and do not, by any means, compensate for the overall VAT cost charities bear.

Another issue is legal uncertainty over what constitutes “business income” for charities, especially the VAT status of grants.  It is worth bearing in mind here the helpful comment in the EC case of Tolsma translated as: “…the question is whether services carried on by [a person] were carried on for the payment or simply with the payment”.

Many charities depend on donations which, due to the economic climate have fallen in value at a time when there is a greater demand on charities from struggling individuals and organisations.

What can be done?

  • ensure any applicable reliefs are taken advantage of
  • if significant expenditure is planned, ensure that professional advice is sought to mitigate any tax loss
  • review the VAT position to ensure that the most appropriate partial exemption methods and non-business apportionment is in place
  • review any land and property transactions. These are high value and some reliefs are available. Additionally it is usually possible to carry out planning to improve the VAT position of a property owning charity
  • review VAT procedures to ensure that VAT is declared correctly. Penalties for even innocent errors have increased recently and are incredibly swingeing
  • consider a VAT “healthcheck” which often identifies problems and planning opportunities

We have considerable expertise in the NFP sector and would be pleased to discuss any areas of concern, or advise on ways of reducing the impact of VAT on a charity.

More detail on VAT and Charities for guidance

Business activities

It is important not to confuse the term ‘trading’ as frequently used by a charity to describe its non-charitable commercial fund-raising activities (usually carried out by a trading subsidiary) with ‘business’ as used for VAT purposes. Although trading activities will invariably be business activities, ‘business’ for VAT purposes can have a much wider application and include some or all of the charity’s primary or charitable activities.

Registration and basic principles

Any business (including a charity and NFP or its trading subsidiary) which makes taxable supplies in excess of the VAT registration threshold must register for VAT. Taxable supplies are business transactions that are liable to VAT at the standard rate, reduced rate or zero rate.

If a charity’s income from taxable supplies is below the VAT registration threshold it can voluntarily register for VAT but a charity that makes no taxable supplies (either because it has no business activities or because its supplies or income are exempt from VAT) cannot register.

Charging VAT

Where a VAT-registered charity makes supplies of goods and services in the course of its business activities, the VAT liability of those supplies is, in general, determined in the normal way as for any other business. Even if VAT-registered, a charity should not charge VAT on any non-business supplies or income.

Reclaiming VAT

This is usually a two stage process (a combined calculation is possible but it must have written approval from HMRC – Notice 706 para 7) . The first stage in determining the amount of VAT which a VAT-registered charity can reclaim is to eliminate all the VAT incurred that relates to its non-business activities. It cannot reclaim any VAT it is charged on purchases that directly relate to non-business activities. It will also not be able to reclaim a proportion of the VAT on its general expenses (eg; telephone, IT and electricity) that relate to those non-business activities.

Once this has been done, the remaining VAT relating to the charity’s business activities is input tax.

The second stage: It can reclaim all the input tax it has been charged on purchases which directly relate to standard-rated, reduced-rated or zero-rated goods or services it supplies.

It cannot reclaim any of the input tax it has been charged on purchases that relate directly to exempt supplies.

It also cannot claim a proportion of input tax on general expenses (after adjustment for non-business activities) that relates to exempt activities unless this amount, together with the input tax relating directly to exempt supplies, is below the minimis limit.

Business and non-business activities

An organisation such as a charity that is run on a non-profit-making basis may still be regarded as carrying on a business activity for VAT purposes. This is unaffected by the fact that the activity is performed for the benefit of the community. It is therefore important for a charity to determine whether any particular transactions are ‘business’ or ‘non-business’ activities. This applies both when considering registration (if there is no business activity a charity cannot be registered and therefore cannot recover any input tax) and after registration.  If registered, a charity must account for VAT on taxable supplies it makes by way of business. Income from any non-business activities is not subject to VAT and affects the amount of VAT reclaimable as input tax.

‘Business’ has a wide meaning for VAT purposes based upon Directive 2006/112/EC (which uses the term ‘economic activity’ rather than ‘business’), UK VAT legislation and decisions by the Courts and VAT Tribunals.  An activity may still be business if the amount charged does no more than cover the cost to the charity of making the supply or where the charge made is less than cost. If the charity makes no charge at all the activity is unlikely to be considered business.

An area of particular difficulty for charities when considering whether their activities are in the course of business is receipt of grant funding.

Partial Exemption

The VAT a business incurs on running costs is called input tax.  For most businesses this is reclaimed on VAT returns from HMRC if it relates to standard rated or zero rated sales that that business makes.  However, a business which makes exempt sales may not be in a position to recover all of the input tax which it incurred.  A business in this position is called partly exempt.  Generally, any input tax which directly relates to exempt supplies is irrecoverable.  In addition, an element of that business’ general overheads are deemed to be in part attributable to exempt supplies and a calculation must be performed to establish the element which falls to be irrecoverable.

Input tax which falls within the overheads category must be apportioned according to a so called; partial exemption method. The “Standard Method” requires a comparison between the value of taxable and exempt supplies made by the business.  The calculation is; the percentage of taxable supplies of all supplies multiplied by the input tax to be apportioned which gives the element of VAT input tax which may be recovered.  Other partial exemption methods (so called Special Methods) are available by specific agreement with HMRC. There is also a de minimis relief.

My flowchart may be of use: partial exemption flowchart 

Summary

One may see that this is a complex area for charities and not for profit entities to deal with. Certainly a review is almost always beneficial, as are discussions regarding partial exemption methods.

Please click here for more information on our services for charities.

Who can claim import VAT? The TSI Instruments case

By   5 November 2025
0

Latest from the courts

In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of TSI Instruments Limited the issue was whether the appellant could claim import VAT when it was not the owner of the imported goods. The amount of VAT at stake was circa £8.5 million.

Background

TSI Instruments (TSI) imported scientific equipment owned by its customers for repair. The main activity of TSI in the UK is the service, repair and calibration of TSI Group goods which had previously been sold to customers around the world.

TSI is named as the importer and paid the charges made by the shipping company for dealing with the declaration and customs clearance formalities on behalf of TSI as well as paying the import VAT which it claimed.

Contentions

HMRC refused to repay the claims on the basis that only the entity with title to the goods is able to deduct the import VAT.

The appellant argued there is no requirement in the legislation that the importer should be the owner of the goods in order for import VAT to be credited. TSI asserted that, as long as the goods are imported for the purposes of its taxable business and it bears the costs of the import, the import VAT can be credited as input tax.

Decision

The FTT ruled that TSI was not entitled to claim input VAT credit for import VAT paid on goods it did not own, and the appeal was dismissed. Via both EU and UK VAT law, the right to deduct import VAT is restricted to the actual owner of the goods or the entity which has the right to dispose of the goods as their owner (or where the cost or value of the goods is reflected in the price of specific output transactions or in the price of goods and services supplied in the course of their economic activities). Since TSI did not own the goods, and their value was not included in the repair service price, the FTT ruled against TSI.

Commentary

This position could have been avoided by planning being put in place. TSI could have used Inward Processing Relief or the owner of the goods could have been the importer.

Legislation/HMRC guidance

VIT13300 – Import VAT may only be claimed by the owner of the goods who would be entitled to reclaim the import VAT either in accordance with s24 VATA 1994 (if registered for VAT in the UK) or under part XXI of the VAT Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518) if they are not registered for VAT in the UK, provided they satisfy the legislative conditions. For further information see Notice 723A.

HMRC published Revenue and Customs Briefs 2 (2019) and Brief 15 (2020) which restated HMRC’s long-standing policy that it is the owner of the imported goods who is entitled to recover the import VAT under current UK legislation. These Briefs clarify, but do not change, HMRC’s policy.

VAT: Repayment interest/commercial restitution

By   28 October 2025
0

Repayment interest and commercial restitution for VAT Autumn Budget 2025 representation by the Chartered Institute of Taxation.

This joint representation by the CIOT and the ATT covers the blatant unfairness of the amount of interest HMRC charges taxpayers when a business pays VAT late and the amount that HMRC pays a taxpayer when there are delays in making repayments to a business when they are due. Unsurprisingly, taxpayers have to pay a higher rate of interest; for reasons unknown!

Details here. 

 

VAT: Late claims for input tax

By   21 October 2025
0

HMRC has recently updated its internal guidance: VIT33000 – How to treat input tax: late claims for input tax.

Input tax claims should be made in the accounting period in which the tax on the relevant goods or services became chargeable (the time of supply, or ‘tax point’). This is referred to as the ‘proper period’.

There are times when a claim cannot be made in the proper period. For example, the supporting evidence may not have been received. However, there are other reasons for claiming input tax in later periods, such as:

  • Businesses carrying out due diligence to get their tax affair right – examining invoices which may include deductible and non-deductible costs.
  • Internal accounting procedures and governance – Business may have a cut-off date for processing invoices, eg: 20th of the last month in the tax period.  Invoices received from 21st would not be processed and therefore submitted in a later period.

Recovery of input tax outside the proper period is subject to the Commissioners’ discretion under The VAT Regulations 1995, Regulation 29.  HMRC will allow late claims to input tax in the above circumstances and in specific cases, provided HMRC is satisfied that allowing the late claims in a later period does not lead to overclaiming input tax  or less tax being payable than if the input tax was claimed in the ‘proper period’.

HMRC will not exercise discretion to allow late claims of input tax on VAT returns in a later period where there is evidence of careless error or repeated late claims.

If tax is not deducted in the proper period due to an error, a business can recover the tax in a later period via The VAT Regulations 1995, Regulation 35 . More information on this subject and recent updates to the procedures here .

VAT: Can Nitrous Oxide be zero-rated food? The Telamara case – no laughing matter

By   1 October 2025
0

Latest from the courts

In the First-Tier tribunal (FTT) case of Telamara Limited the issue was whether Nitrous Oxide (N₂O) used exclusively for culinary use can be zero-rated.

Background

The appellant supplied N₂O canisters which were used as cream chargers. These were used for whipping cream and creating foams and mousses, and to infuse liquids. The relevant invoices described the product as; “Dairy products misc. Cream/beverage infusers 600 x 8g cylinder”. The chargers were not for medical use. The chargers were certified as Halal products.

Telamara’s customers were wholesalers and the units in which the chargers were sold were in boxes of 600. The packaging states that the contents of the chargers should not be inhaled. If consumed on its own N₂O is tasteless and all but imperceptible and its only effect is on the consistency of the whipped food.

The contentions

Telamara considered that the sale of the canisters should be zero-rated because they were for culinary use as food of a kind for human consumption via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8 VAT Act 1994, Group 1, Item 1. It was accepted that the N₂O would not be “eaten on its own” but it nevertheless was said to form an ingredient of all of the food substances into which it was incorporated by infusion or by use of the cream whipper, changing the state and nature of those foods. Furthermore, the appellant claimed unfairness because HMRC had been unable to provide clear guidance on the correct VAT treatment when the business started but HMRC subsequently became certain the supplies were standard rated.

Unsurprisingly, HMRC disagreed, formed a view that the supplies were not of food, and raised an assessment for the output tax it deemed to be due on the standard rated supplies.

Decision

The appeal was dismissed. It was found that the chargers were not food because N₂O:

  • had no nutritional value
  • is a food additive, not food
  • does not add to the calories of food
  • is odourless, colourless, and tasteless
  • is a gas and therefore incapable of being either eaten or drunk

The Tribunal concluded that the gases were standard rated as they were not food of a kind used for human consumption. It concluded that no informed and broad-minded person considering whether the gases were food would conclude that they were.

Commentary

Yet another “Is it food?” case adding to a long list. The Tribunal helpfully set out (drawing from an extensive and thorough review of the very many cases which have considered the scope of zero-rating of food) the required exercise considering and weighing up the following factors to answer the question of whether something is food:

(1) Nutritional value

(2) Palatability

(3) Form of the product

(4) Manner of/directions for consumption

(5) Frequency of consumption

(6) Marketing

(7) Purpose of the product

(8) Range of uses

(9) Constituent ingredients

(10) Dictionary definition of food

Summary

Is it food? is not as a straightforward question as it may seem!

We recommend that any business which is involved in ‘food” or “food-like” products should undertake a review in light of this case. We can, of course, help with this .