A curious matter and one which brings into focus the drinking habits of people across the EU. Now, as those who know me will be aware, I am not adverse to a good single malt, nor a decent claret, but I do wonder sometimes where people draw the line.
Background
It transpires that in Lithuania people who choose not to drink, or cannot afford, even the cheapest alcoholic items have turned to drinking perfume and mouthwash which contain isopropyl alcohol. This has a similar effect on the human body to what most people would regard as being from more usual beer, wine or spirits etc. Sounds delicious eh?
Issue
The issue was whether these products where subject to Excise Duty, or, as the appellant contended, they were duty free as cosmetic products.
Decision
The AG found that isopropyl alcohol is almost unpalatable to most people. The fact that Bene Factum held out, advertised and marketed to people to drink the products did not affect the fact that the main purpose of the goods was for their use as cosmetics and mouthwash. What must be considered is Excise Duty depends on an objective classification to determine whether it is intended for human consumption. This classification is not affected by the fact that Bene Factum actively encouraged people to drink these products rather than use them for cosmetic purposes.
Consequently, the goods where not subject to Excise Duty. Good news for Lithuanian alcohol connoisseurs! It remains to see if the court follows this opinion, in most cases they do, but one never knows.
Commentary
If there is anybody out there who is getting ready for their Christmas party, looks at some cosmetic products and considers taking a swig, I make the following comments:
HMRC has published (on 28 November 2025) a collection of new guidance on postponed VAT accounting (PVA).
The guidance covers what a business needs to do if it is using PVA to account for import VAT on its VAT returns.
The publication brings together all PVA guidance, giving detailed information about:
Latest from the courts
In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of TSI Instruments Limited the issue was whether the appellant could claim import VAT when it was not the owner of the imported goods. The amount of VAT at stake was circa £8.5 million.
Background
TSI Instruments (TSI) imported scientific equipment owned by its customers for repair. The main activity of TSI in the UK is the service, repair and calibration of TSI Group goods which had previously been sold to customers around the world.
TSI is named as the importer and paid the charges made by the shipping company for dealing with the declaration and customs clearance formalities on behalf of TSI as well as paying the import VAT which it claimed.
Contentions
HMRC refused to repay the claims on the basis that only the entity with title to the goods is able to deduct the import VAT.
The appellant argued there is no requirement in the legislation that the importer should be the owner of the goods in order for import VAT to be credited. TSI asserted that, as long as the goods are imported for the purposes of its taxable business and it bears the costs of the import, the import VAT can be credited as input tax.
Decision
The FTT ruled that TSI was not entitled to claim input VAT credit for import VAT paid on goods it did not own, and the appeal was dismissed. Via both EU and UK VAT law, the right to deduct import VAT is restricted to the actual owner of the goods or the entity which has the right to dispose of the goods as their owner (or where the cost or value of the goods is reflected in the price of specific output transactions or in the price of goods and services supplied in the course of their economic activities). Since TSI did not own the goods, and their value was not included in the repair service price, the FTT ruled against TSI.
Commentary
This position could have been avoided by planning being put in place. TSI could have used Inward Processing Relief or the owner of the goods could have been the importer.
Legislation/HMRC guidance
VIT13300 – Import VAT may only be claimed by the owner of the goods who would be entitled to reclaim the import VAT either in accordance with s24 VATA 1994 (if registered for VAT in the UK) or under part XXI of the VAT Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518) if they are not registered for VAT in the UK, provided they satisfy the legislative conditions. For further information see Notice 723A.
HMRC published Revenue and Customs Briefs 2 (2019) and Brief 15 (2020) which restated HMRC’s long-standing policy that it is the owner of the imported goods who is entitled to recover the import VAT under current UK legislation. These Briefs clarify, but do not change, HMRC’s policy.
VAT basics
None of us are perfect, and any business can make mistakes with VAT despite all intentions to take reasonable care. So what are the most common errors? Here’s a list of pitfalls to avoid:
Wrong rate of output tax charged
Land and property transactions
Cross-border issues
Inter-company charges
Partial exemption
Business entertainment
Registration
VAT groups
Tax points (Time Of Supply)
Bad Debt Relief issues
Overseas issues
Claiming input tax without the correct documentation
Recovering irreclaimable input tax
Return errors
Business promotion schemes
Composite or separate supplies
Changes to a business
Fuel and motoring costs
Special schemes
One-off transactions
Non-business (NB) and charitable activities
Errors can lead to draconian penalties, and ignorance is not a defence.
A guide to VAT triggerpoints here .
Wigs for teddy bears are subject to Customs Duty, but the Upper Tribunal ruled that ‘realistic” hearts used for a Build-A-Bear toy are duty free.
VAT Basics
I have to charge myself VAT? How comes?!
Well, normally, the supplier is the person who must account to the tax authorities for any VAT due on the supply. However, in certain situations, the position is reversed and it is the customer who must account for any VAT due. Don’t get caught out!
Here are just some of the situations when you have to charge yourself VAT:
Purchasing services from abroad
These will be obtained free of VAT from an overseas supplier. What is known as the ‘reverse charge’ procedure must be applied. Where the reverse charge procedure applies, the recipient of the services must act as both the supplier and the recipient of the services. On the same VAT return, the recipient must account for output tax, calculated on the full value of the supply received, and (subject to partial exemption and non-business rules) include the VAT charged as input tax. The effect of the provisions is that the reverse charge has no net cost to the recipient if he can attribute the input tax to taxable supplies and can therefore reclaim it in full. If he cannot, the effect is to put him in the same position as if had received the supply from a UK supplier rather than from one outside the UK. Thus creating a level playing field between purchasing from the UK and overseas.
Accounting for VAT and recovery of input tax.
Where the reverse charge procedure applies, the recipient of the services must act as both the supplier and the recipient of the services. On the same VAT return, the recipient must
Value of supply: The value of the deemed supply is to be taken to be the consideration in money for which the services were in fact supplied or, where the consideration did not consist or not wholly consist of money, such amount in money as is equivalent to that consideration. The consideration payable to the overseas supplier for the services excludes UK VAT but includes any taxes levied abroad.
Time of supply: The time of supply of such services is the date the supplies are paid for or, if the consideration is not in money, the last day of the VAT period in which the services are performed.
Deregistration
Any goods on hand at deregistration with a total value of over £1,000 on which input tax has been claimed are subject to a self supply. This is a similar mechanism to a reverse charge in that the goods are deemed to be supplied to the business by the business and output tax is due. However, in these circumstances it is not possible to recover any input tax on the self supply.
Flat Rate Scheme
There is a self supply of capital items on which input tax has been claimed when a business leaves the flat rate scheme (and remains VAT registered).
Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC)
The DRC makes supplies of standard or reduced rated construction services between construction or building businesses subject to the domestic DRC, which means that the recipient of the supply will be liable to account for VAT due, instead of the supplier. Consequently, the customer in the construction industry receiving the supply of construction services will be required to pay the VAT directly to HMRC rather than paying it to the supplier. It will be able to reclaim this VAT subject to the normal VAT rules. The RC will apply throughout the supply chain up to the point where the customer receiving the supply is no longer a business that makes supplies of construction services (a so-called end user, see below). More here.
Mobile telephones and computer chips
In order to counter missing trader intra-community fraud (‘MTIC’), supplies of mobile telephones and computer chips which are made by one VAT registered business to another and valued at £5,000 and over are subject to the reverse charge. This means that the purchaser rather than the seller is responsible for accounting for VAT due.
Road fuel and power for private use
When business fuel is used privately, self-supply charges apply based on HMRC’s published road fuel scale charges, applied per vehicle per quarter.
Alternatively, businesses can maintain detailed mileage records for actual business use percentage calculations.
Land and buildings…. and motor cars
There are certain circumstances where land and buildings must be treated as a self supply… but that is a whole new subject in itself… as is supplies in the motor trade.
Even if the result of a self-supply or reverse charge is VAT neutral HMRC is within its rights to assess and levy penalties and interest in cases where the charge has not been applied; which always seems unfair. However, more often than not simple accounting entries will deal with the matter…. if the circumstances are recognised and it is remembered to actually make the entries!
VAT Basics
A Non-Established Taxable Person (NETP) may be required to appoint a tax representative or tax agent if they make taxable supplies in the UK. The term NETP is used to describe a person who is liable to be registered for VAT under the VAT ACT 1994 Schedule 1a. A NETP must register for VAT as soon as it makes its first taxable supply in the UK, or when it expects to make taxable supplies here within the next 30 days, that is; there is no turnover limit for a NETP.
A NETP is a business which has no place of belonging in the UK. So, what is the difference between a representative and agent, and does the NETP get a choice?
Tax representative
A representative maintains the NETP’s VAT records, submits VAT returns and accounts for UK VAT on behalf of the NETP and dels with communication with HMRC. A representative is jointly and severally liable for any VAT debts incurred by the NETP.
A NETP may only appoint one person at a time to act on its behalf, although a tax representative may act for more than one NETP.
Tax agent
An agent carries out a similar role to a representative, however, the important difference is that HMRC cannot hold an agent responsible for any of NETP’s VAT debts. HMRC reserve the right not to deal with any particular agent. In some circumstances, if HMRC deem think it necessary, it will insist that a tax representative is appointed.
As long as HMRC has not directed (see below) a NETP to appoint a tax representative, it can appoint an agent to deal UK VAT affairs. Any arrangement made will be subject to whatever contractual agreement the NETP and agent decide. In some circumstances, if HMRC think it is necessary, it may still insist that a tax representative is appointed.
Distinction
The tax representative and the tax agent both act on behalf of a NETP. However, while the tax agent operates in the name of the NETP, the tax representative operates in its own name. Consequently, a tax representative is personally committed to pay HMRC and must be accredited beforehand. Contracts between representatives/agents need to be clear on this point and fees charged for this work should reflect the difference in responsibilities. Should the NETP fail to pay VAT, penalties and interest due, HMRC will collect these directly from the tax representative, so, in effect, the tax representative represents a monetary insurance for HMRC.
Direction
HMRC can direct some NETPs to appoint a tax representative who must be:
this is via VAT Act 1994, section 48(1).
HMRC may choose to require some form of security from a NETP whether or not there has been any direction regarding the appointment of a representative.
Not appointing a tax representative or agent
If a NETP does not wish to appoint a tax representative or agent, and HMRC has not directed them to appoint a tax representative, it must meet all its obligations under UK VAT law itself. This includes, inter alia:
Post Brexit
For UK businesses making overseas supplies:
Businesses established within the EU are exempted from appointing a tax representative in other Member-States (MS) as international tax assistance is compulsory within the EU (the local tax administration can request assistance from the country of establishment to recover the money directly from the business). Since Brexit, the UK became a third country, so this rule does not apply, and MS have the choice to make the appointment of a tax representative compulsory for UK businesses. Most MS have done so, the notable exception being Germany.
New guidance for registration of a NETP here.
HMRC has published its annual report and accounts 2024 to 2025 on 17 July 2025.
Highlights
HMRC issued new guidance for businesses which sell goods using an online marketplace on 20 June 2025. It enables online marketplace (an e-commerce site that connects sellers with buyers where transactions are managed by the website owner) operators to check if a seller is established outside the UK, so that it can establish which party is liable for VAT on sales.
Background
An online marketplace operator is liable for VAT on goods of any value that are both:
The operator needs to establish who is liable for VAT on sales of goods which are facilitated. To confirm this, the operator needs to take all reasonable steps to check whether a seller is established outside the UK. A business is required to keep evidence to show that it has taken all reasonable steps.
This new guidance includes details about how to check where an online marketplace seller is established and provides information about checks and process businesses can put in place. HMRC will review this evidence and will consider all evidence which has been used to establish where the seller is established. In each case, it will consider:
Examples of checks
HMRC give the following examples of types of checks which might be undertaken to determine if an online seller is UK-established:
Overview of online sellers
More general guidance from HMRC on online sellers:
The rules aim to avoid VAT evasion by non-UK online sellers.