Category Archives: VAT Errors

VAT: Late claims for input tax

By   21 October 2025
0

HMRC has recently updated its internal guidance: VIT33000 – How to treat input tax: late claims for input tax.

Input tax claims should be made in the accounting period in which the tax on the relevant goods or services became chargeable (the time of supply, or ‘tax point’). This is referred to as the ‘proper period’.

There are times when a claim cannot be made in the proper period. For example, the supporting evidence may not have been received. However, there are other reasons for claiming input tax in later periods, such as:

  • Businesses carrying out due diligence to get their tax affair right – examining invoices which may include deductible and non-deductible costs.
  • Internal accounting procedures and governance – Business may have a cut-off date for processing invoices, eg: 20th of the last month in the tax period.  Invoices received from 21st would not be processed and therefore submitted in a later period.

Recovery of input tax outside the proper period is subject to the Commissioners’ discretion under The VAT Regulations 1995, Regulation 29.  HMRC will allow late claims to input tax in the above circumstances and in specific cases, provided HMRC is satisfied that allowing the late claims in a later period does not lead to overclaiming input tax  or less tax being payable than if the input tax was claimed in the ‘proper period’.

HMRC will not exercise discretion to allow late claims of input tax on VAT returns in a later period where there is evidence of careless error or repeated late claims.

If tax is not deducted in the proper period due to an error, a business can recover the tax in a later period via The VAT Regulations 1995, Regulation 35 . More information on this subject and recent updates to the procedures here .

VAT DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme – useful information

By   20 October 2025
0

The DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme is a tax refund scheme for people who build, or arrange to have built, a house they intend to live in. It also applies to converting commercial property into a house(s). Details here

However, there are often uncertainties and disputes over precisely what tax may be claimed on various expenditure. To this end, HMRC has published a comprehensive list of items, sorted alphabetically, which should avoid a lot of potential disagreements on claims.

It should be noted that a claim for services can only be made for conversions (at the reduced rate of 5%) as any services in respect of a new build property should be zero rated.

What else can a housebuilder not claim for?

There is no claim available for:

  • building projects outside the UK
  • materials or services that are not subject to VAT, eg; are zero-rated or exempt or provided by a non VAT-registered supplier
  • professional or supervisory fees, eg; architects and surveyors
  • the hire of plant, tools and equipment, eg; generators, scaffolding and skips
  • building materials that aren’t permanently attached to or, part of, the building itself
  • some fitted furniture, electrical and gas appliances, carpets or garden ornaments
  • supplies for which you do not have a VAT invoice.

If you would like assistance with making a claim, please contact us.

Common VAT mistakes

By   2 October 2025
0

VAT basics

None of us are perfect, and any business can make mistakes with VAT despite all intentions to take reasonable care. So what are the most common errors? Here’s a list of pitfalls to avoid:

Wrong rate of output tax charged

Land and property transactions

  • Misunderstanding the correct VAT treatment of a land and property transactions
  • Not recognising VAT issues
  • Issues with the Option To Tax
  • TOGC issues
  • A guide to triggerpoints here

Cross-border issues

  • Failing to meet the requirements to zero-rate exports
  • Incorrect import procedures
  • Ignoring the reverse charge

Inter-company charges

Partial exemption

Business entertainment

  • Different rules apply to the recovery of input tax on entertaining depending on the type of recipient, eg: clients, contacts, staff, partners and directors depending on the circumstances

Registration

VAT groups

  • Failing to VAT group when beneficial or failing to disband
  • Recovery of input tax
  • Timing of transactions
  • Partial exemption issues

Tax points (Time Of Supply)

  • Failing to recognise a tax point for output tax
  • Incorrect treatment of deposits
  • Incorrect treatment of forfeit deposits
  • Recovery of input tax at incorrect time

Bad Debt Relief issues

  • Failing to claim Bad Debt Relief
  • Failing to repay a claim to HMRC when payment from customer is received
  • Failing to repay input tax when a supplier is not paid (after six months)

Overseas issues

Claiming input tax without the correct documentation

  • A guide to alternative evidence here

Recovering irreclaimable input tax

  • A guide to what VAT is not claimable here

Return errors

  • A box-by-box guide here

Business promotion schemes

Composite or separate supplies

Changes to a business

  • Selling new products, acquisitions, share sales, disposals, re-structuring, and ceasing to trade can all have a VAT impact and this can be missed

Fuel and motoring costs

Special schemes

One-off transactions

  • Failing to recognise VAT issues of unusual or one-off transactions

Non-business (NB) and charitable activities

  • Failure to recognise NB activities
  • Failure to restrict input tax in connection with NB activities

Errors can lead to draconian penalties, and ignorance is not a defence.

A guide to VAT triggerpoints here .

I have to charge myself VAT?!

By   22 September 2025
0

VAT Basics

I have to charge myself VAT?  How comes?!

Well, normally, the supplier is the person who must account to the tax authorities for any VAT due on the supply. However, in certain situations, the position is reversed and it is the customer who must account for any VAT due. Don’t get caught out!

Here are just some of the situations when you have to charge yourself VAT:

Purchasing services from abroad

These will be obtained free of VAT from an overseas supplier. What is known as the ‘reverse charge’ procedure must be applied. Where the reverse charge procedure applies, the recipient of the services must act as both the supplier and the recipient of the services. On the same VAT return, the recipient must account for output tax, calculated on the full value of the supply received, and (subject to partial exemption and non-business rules) include the VAT charged as input tax. The effect of the provisions is that the reverse charge has no net cost to the recipient if he can attribute the input tax to taxable supplies and can therefore reclaim it in full. If he cannot, the effect is to put him in the same position as if had received the supply from a UK supplier rather than from one outside the UK. Thus creating a level playing field between purchasing from the UK and overseas.

Accounting for VAT and recovery of input tax.

Where the reverse charge procedure applies, the recipient of the services must act as both the supplier and the recipient of the services.  On the same VAT return, the recipient must

  • account for output tax, calculated on the full value of the supply received, in Box 1;
  • (subject to partial exemption and non-business rules) include the VAT stated in box 1 as input tax in Box 4; and;
  • include the full value of the supply in both Boxes 6 and 7.

Value of supply: The value of the deemed supply is to be taken to be the consideration in money for which the services were in fact supplied or, where the consideration did not consist or not wholly consist of money, such amount in money as is equivalent to that consideration.  The consideration payable to the overseas supplier for the services excludes UK VAT but includes any taxes levied abroad.

Time of supply: The time of supply of such services is the date the supplies are paid for or, if the consideration is not in money, the last day of the VAT period in which the services are performed.

Deregistration

Any goods on hand at deregistration with a total value of over £1,000 on which input tax has been claimed are subject to a self supply. This is a similar mechanism to a reverse charge in that the goods are deemed to be supplied to the business by the business and output tax is due. However, in these circumstances it is not possible to recover any input tax on the self supply.

Flat Rate Scheme

There is a self supply of capital items on which input tax has been claimed when a business leaves the flat rate scheme (and remains VAT registered).

Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC)

The DRC makes supplies of standard or reduced rated construction services between construction or building businesses subject to the domestic DRC, which means that the recipient of the supply will be liable to account for VAT due, instead of the supplier. Consequently, the customer in the construction industry receiving the supply of construction services will be required to pay the VAT directly to HMRC rather than paying it to the supplier. It will be able to reclaim this VAT subject to the normal VAT rules. The RC will apply throughout the supply chain up to the point where the customer receiving the supply is no longer a business that makes supplies of construction services (a so-called end user, see below). More here. 

Mobile telephones and computer chips

In order to counter missing trader intra-community fraud (‘MTIC’), supplies of mobile telephones and computer chips which are made by one VAT registered business to another and valued at £5,000 and over are subject to the reverse charge. This means that the purchaser rather than the seller is responsible for accounting for VAT due.

Road fuel and power for private use 

When business fuel is used privately, self-supply charges apply based on HMRC’s published road fuel scale charges, applied per vehicle per quarter.

Alternatively, businesses can maintain detailed mileage records for actual business use percentage calculations. 

Land and buildings…. and motor cars

There are certain circumstances where land and buildings must be treated as a self supply… but that is a whole new subject in itself… as is supplies in the motor trade.

Even if the result of a self-supply or reverse charge is VAT neutral HMRC is within its rights to assess and levy penalties and interest in cases where the charge has not been applied; which always seems unfair.  However, more often than not simple accounting entries will deal with the matter…. if the circumstances are recognised and it is remembered to actually make the entries!

VAT: Error corrections – two new updates and a helpful flowchart

By   9 September 2025
0
VAT Notice 700/45 How to correct VAT errors and make adjustments or claims has been updated. The Notice sets out how to amend a business’ VAT records if errors have been made, how to correct errors on VAT returns, and how to claim a refund if VAT declarations have been overstated. The changes are:
  • information on how and when to correct VAT errors
  • what happens if corrections are not made
  • information about claiming input tax
  • more information about how underpayments and overpayments are paid
  • HMRC’s response time after receiving an error correction
  • clarification of the unjust enrichment rules
  • the reimbursement scheme
  • how HMRC repays interest owed on overpayments

Additionally, HMRC’s guidance: Check how to tell HMRC about VAT return errors has been updated.

This guidance explains the requirements for updating a VAT return, and how to make a correction online or tell HMRC in writing about errors. The update states that it is no longer possible to correct errors on VAT returns using form VAT652.
Basically, the guidance sets out how to report errors of £10,000 or more (net of all errors). This broadly comes down to using the online service or adjusting a current VAT return.
Please see our flowchart on error reporting Error Reporting Flowchart

VAT & Import Duty

By   26 August 2025
0

HMRC has updated its Guidance on How to claim a repayment of import duty and VAT if you have overpaid

It sets out how to check time limits and how to claim for importers, agents, freight forwarders or express operators. It also explains how to use the Customs Declaration Service or form C285 as an individual.

It covers:

  • who can apply
  • when to apply
  • how to apply
  • what you need — Customs Declaration Service
  • apply online — Customs Declaration Service
  • what you will need — C285 form
  • apply online — C285 form
  • what happens after the application

Transfer of a VAT registration number – form update

By   19 May 2025
0

A business can request transfer of a VAT registration number if it is taking over a company and wishes to use the previous owner’s VAT registration number, or the status of a business is changing, eg; a sole proprietor business incorporates or changes to a partnership. To do this form VAT68 is used.

VAT68

To transfer a VAT registration number because of a change in company ownership, the buying entity must complete both an application for VAT registration and form VAT68. The application may be independent from any existing registration, or it can be an application to join an existing VAT group or form a new one.

A form VAT68 can be submitted via email to HMRC at btc.changeoflegalentity@gov.uk with the VAT registration service (VRS) number included in the email subject line, or sent to the postal address shown on the form.

The update includes the addition of information to confirm an application for VAT registration should be completed.

Care must also be taken when buying or selling a business as the Transfer Of a Going Concern (TOGC) rules can be complex and as with all ‘one-off’ transactions, they are usually out of the ordinary and sometimes high value, giving rise to potential VAT issues. Please see: VAT triggerpoints.

Warning

Unless there is a good reason to transfer a VAT number, we usually advise that this is not done. This is to avoid inheriting the tax history of the previous owner. The buyer of the business can be held responsible for past errors, late payments, ongoing VAT issues etc. These may not be apparent, even after thorough due diligence.

VAT: Tribunal costs

By   23 April 2025
0

    Latest from the courts

    In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Eurolaser IT Ltd regarding Kittel and Mecsek assessments and penalties:

    • whether an agent knew or should have known of fraud in supply chain – yes
    • whether such knowledge/means of knowledge to be attributed to Appellant – yes
    • whether Mecsek requires HMRC to show reasonable steps not taken by Appellant – yes
    • whether reasonable steps taken – no
    • unsurprisingly, the appeal was refused

    one interesting aspect was the award of costs.

    Generally, in FTT cases the rule is that each party will usually bear its own costs.

    However, it is worth recapping how the award of costs works via The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009. In this instant case, the Appellant had not ‘opted out’ of the costs protection regime set out in rule 10(c)(ii) of the Rules. Consequently, the FTT ordered that Eurolaser must pay HMRC’s costs – a sting in the tail. So, what are the rules? (Where relevant here)

    Orders for costs

    “10.—(1) The Tribunal may only make an order in respect of costs (or, in Scotland, expenses)—

    (a) under section 29(4) of the 2007 Act (wasted costs) [and costs incurred in applying for such costs];

    (b) if the Tribunal considers that a party or their representative has acted unreasonably in bringing, defending or conducting the proceedings; 

    (c) if—

    (i) the proceedings have been allocated as a Complex case under rule 23 (allocation of cases to categories); and

    (ii) the taxpayer (or, where more than one party is a taxpayer, one of them) has not sent or delivered a written request to the Tribunal, within 28 days of receiving notice that the case had been allocated as a Complex case, that the proceedings be excluded from potential liability for costs or expenses under this sub-paragraph”

    So, in “Complex” cases, an Appellant must submit a request that the case is excluded from the potential liability of costs being awarded, and HMRC must request repayment of its costs incurred in defending the case.

    What are Complex cases?

    These are complicated cases which:

    • require lengthy or complex evidence
    • require a lengthy hearing
    • involve complex or important principles or issues
    • involve large amounts or tax or penalties

    such cases are allocated to a ‘track’ within the FTT system.

    Other cost awards

    It is also worth remembering that costs can be awarded if the appeal is brought unreasonably. This usually means that it is vexatious or frivolous, so proper advice should be sought when considering an appeal.

    VAT: Supply of self-contained apartments covered by TOMS? The Sonder UT case

    By   21 January 2025
    0

    Latest from the courts

    In the Upper Tribunal (UT) case of Sonder Europe Limited (Sonder) the issue was whether apartments leased to Sonder and used to provide short-term accommodation to corporate and leisure travellers were supplies of a designated travel service via the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) and whether the bought-in supply was used for the direct benefit of travellers (as required by TOMS).

    Background

    Sonder leased apartments from landlords on a medium to long-term basis and used them to provide accommodation to travellers on a short-term basis (one night to a month; the average stay being five nights). Sonder furnished some apartments as well as undertaking occasional decorating and maintenance.

    The sole issue was whether these supplies are covered by TOMS. TOMS is not optional.

    Initially in the FTT it was decided that output tax was due via TOMS. This was an appeal by HMRC against that First Tier Tribunal (FTT) decision.

    The issue

    Whether VAT was accountable using TOMS – on the margin, or on the full amount received from travellers by Sonder.

    Legislation

    TOMS is authorised by the VAT Act 1994, section 53 and via SI 1987/1806.

    Arguments

    Sonder contended that the supply was “for the direct benefit of the traveller” as required by the VAT (Tour Operators) Order 1987 and that the accommodation was provided “…without material alteration or further processing”. Consequently, TOMS applied. The FTT decided that Sonder did not materially alter or process the apartments.

    HMRC maintained that the FTT decision was based on the physical alternations made rather than the actual characteristics of the supplies. Consequently, these were not supplies covered by the 1987 Order and output tax was due on the total income received for these services.

     Decision

    The UT upheld HMRC’s appeal and decided that TOMS did not apply n these circumstances The UT found that the FTT’s decision was in error in that it did not have regard to whether the services bought in were supplied to it for the direct benefit of travellers. Furthermore, the short-term leases to occupy property as holiday accommodation were materially altered from interests in land for a period of years supplied by the landlords.

    The services received by Sonder from the landlords were not for the direct benefit of the travellers and Sonder’s supplies were not for the benefit of the users without material alteration and further processing. Consequently, there was not a supply of bought-in services, but rather an ‘in-house’ supply which was not covered by TOMS.

    To the UT, the position was even clearer in relation to unfurnished apartments. Sonder acquired an interest in land for a term of years in an unfurnished apartment. It furnished the apartment and then supplied a short-term licence to a traveller to occupy as holiday accommodation. What was supplied to the traveller was materially different to what was supplied to Sonder.

    Commentary

     Another illustration of the complexities of TOMS and the significant impact on a business of getting the rules wrong. The fact that the UT remade the decision demonstrates that different interpretations are possible on similar facts. Moreover, even slight differences in business models can result in different VAT outcomes.