Crisps – spot the difference: Doritos, Monster Munch, Wotsits and poppadums are standard rated, however Pringles, Skips and Twiglets, are VAT free.
Tag Archives: vat-zero-rate
A VAT Did you know?
Kangaroo steak is sold as food in shops – food is zero-rated, but the sale of live kangaroos is standard rated.
VAT: Can Nitrous Oxide be zero-rated food? The Telamara case – no laughing matter
Latest from the courts
In the First-Tier tribunal (FTT) case of Telamara Limited the issue was whether Nitrous Oxide (N₂O) used exclusively for culinary use can be zero-rated.
Background
The appellant supplied N₂O canisters which were used as cream chargers. These were used for whipping cream and creating foams and mousses, and to infuse liquids. The relevant invoices described the product as; “Dairy products misc. Cream/beverage infusers 600 x 8g cylinder”. The chargers were not for medical use. The chargers were certified as Halal products.
Telamara’s customers were wholesalers and the units in which the chargers were sold were in boxes of 600. The packaging states that the contents of the chargers should not be inhaled. If consumed on its own N₂O is tasteless and all but imperceptible and its only effect is on the consistency of the whipped food.
The contentions
Telamara considered that the sale of the canisters should be zero-rated because they were for culinary use as food of a kind for human consumption via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8 VAT Act 1994, Group 1, Item 1. It was accepted that the N₂O would not be “eaten on its own” but it nevertheless was said to form an ingredient of all of the food substances into which it was incorporated by infusion or by use of the cream whipper, changing the state and nature of those foods. Furthermore, the appellant claimed unfairness because HMRC had been unable to provide clear guidance on the correct VAT treatment when the business started but HMRC subsequently became certain the supplies were standard rated.
Unsurprisingly, HMRC disagreed, formed a view that the supplies were not of food, and raised an assessment for the output tax it deemed to be due on the standard rated supplies.
Decision
The appeal was dismissed. It was found that the chargers were not food because N₂O:
- had no nutritional value
- is a food additive, not food
- does not add to the calories of food
- is odourless, colourless, and tasteless
- is a gas and therefore incapable of being either eaten or drunk
The Tribunal concluded that the gases were standard rated as they were not food of a kind used for human consumption. It concluded that no informed and broad-minded person considering whether the gases were food would conclude that they were.
Commentary
Yet another “Is it food?” case adding to a long list. The Tribunal helpfully set out (drawing from an extensive and thorough review of the very many cases which have considered the scope of zero-rating of food) the required exercise considering and weighing up the following factors to answer the question of whether something is food:
(1) Nutritional value
(2) Palatability
(3) Form of the product
(4) Manner of/directions for consumption
(5) Frequency of consumption
(6) Marketing
(7) Purpose of the product
(8) Range of uses
(9) Constituent ingredients
(10) Dictionary definition of food
Summary
Is it food? is not as a straightforward question as it may seem!
We recommend that any business which is involved in ‘food” or “food-like” products should undertake a review in light of this case. We can, of course, help with this .
A VAT Did you know?
Popcorn is standard rated. DIY popcorn – corn which is popped in a microwave is VAT free. Don’t be lazy! 🍿
A VAT Did you know?
Sweetened rice cakes are zero-rated, but savoury flavoured ones are VATable.
BUT… The problem area is salted rice cakes. Lightly salted cakes are considered to require further preparation before consumption (and are therefore zero-rated) whereas more heavily salted rice cakes do not and are standard rated. However, there is no guideline as to where this borderline falls .
VAT Notice 708: Buildings and construction updated
This Notice explains how to establish the appropriate VAT rate on building work and materials for contractors, sub-contractors and developers.
The construction of a new building and work to an existing building is normally standard rated. However, there are exceptions to this, inter alia:
- construction of new qualifying dwellings and communal residential buildings, and certain new buildings used by charities ― zero-rated
- conversion for a housing association of a non-residential building into a qualifying dwelling or communal residential building ― zero-rated
- alterations to suit the condition of people with disabilities ― zero-rated
- first time gas and electricity connections ― zero-rated
- conversion of a non-residential building into a qualifying dwelling or communal residential building ― reduced rate of VAT 5%
- renovation or alteration of empty residential premises ― reduced rate of VAT 5%
- installation of energy saving materials, grant funded heating system measures and qualifying security goods ― reduced rate of VAT 5%
- installation of mobility aids for the elderly for use in domestic accommodation ― reduced rate of VAT 5%
(These are just some examples; other works may also qualify for zero or reduced rating)
Amendments
Paragraph 7 (re: the conversion of premises to a different residential use) on reduced rated work has been amended at para 7.6 as there was uncertainty over the previous drafting.
Paragraph 8.4 has been revised to more accurately reflect the rules on the installation of building materials which are reduce rated.
A VAT Did you know?
Lugworms and maggots are standard rated, unless they are also suitable for human consumption, in which case they may be zero-rated – Yum.
VAT: Are poppadoms crisps? The Walkers Snack Foods case
Latest from the courts
In the Walkers Snack Foods Ltd Upper Tribunal (UT) case the issue was whether Sensations Poppadoms are similar to potato crisps and consequently excluded from the zero rating for food.
The First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that the product was similar to crisps and that it was to be treated as being excepted items from zero-rating and was therefore standard rated.
Background
The salient matter was whether the poppadoms were “made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch” and were “similar” to potato crisps via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8, Group 1, item 1, excepted item 5.
Value Added Tax – excepted item 5 to item 1, Group 1, Part II, Schedule 8 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether First-tier Tribunal erred in law in finding Sensations Poppadoms were “made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch” and were “similar” to potato crisps
This sets out that the following is excepted from the zero rate for “Food of a kind used for human consumption”.
“5. Any of the following when packaged for human consumption without further preparation, namely, potato crisps, potato sticks, potato puffs, and similar products made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch, and savoury food products obtained by the swelling of cereals or cereal products; and salted or roasted nuts other than nuts in shell.”
Contentions
The appellant argued that the poppadoms should be zero-rated for VAT purposes because they fall within Item 1 of Group 1 as they are food, and that they are not included in the list of exceptions.
HMRC contended that that the product fell within excepted item 5 of Group 1, because they are products similar to potato crisps…
Decision
- The UT agreed with the FTT that the words “made from the potato” can extend to products made from potato granules and was neither untenable nor a plain misapplication of the law to the facts.
- The UT recalled that the FTT had concluded that Sensations Poppadoms contained “more than enough potato content” for it to be reasonable to conclude that they were “made from the potato… or from potato starch”. Sensations Poppadoms have a combined potato content (potato granules and potato starch) of 39%-40%, so the potato content is significant. The question for the UT was whether the FTT reached a conclusion which no reasonable tribunal properly construing the statute could have reached. The UT answered “no”.
- The UT noted that the FTT determined that Sensations Poppadoms were similar to potato crisps based on a multifactorial assessment of various factors, including; packaging, appearance, texture and taste. The FTT noted that while the manufacturing processes differ, the statute allows for similarity among products made from potato starch and flour. The FTT found that the potato content in Sensations Poppadoms contributed to a neutral flavour, which did not significantly distinguish them from potato crisps. Broadly, the UT agreed with this determination.
Consequently, for the above reasons the UT dismissed the appeal and the product is subject to the standard rate.
Commentary
Yet another case on the liability of ‘snack foods’. So now we know that: Doritos, Monster Munch, Wotsits and Poppadums are standard rated, however Pringles, Skips and Twiglets are VAT free. This demonstrates the complexity of classifying food and these decisions throw up more complications for producers as this market develops quickly as the public’s taste moves on.
A VAT Did you know?
The sale of ostriches is zero rated, but kangaroos are standard rated. Both are sold as food.
VAT Planning: design and build
Planning
The construction of a new house, and the materials used by the contractor to build it, are zero-rated. However, architect and other building professional fees, eg; surveyors, supervisors, engineers, project or construction management and consultants, are always standard rated; even in respect of a new build.
This will represent an absolute VAT cost to:
- individuals
- entities which will rent the house(s) after completion
- housing associations (in some circumstances)
- certain entities which are not in business
- any entity which will use the building(s) for other exempt purposes
- entities which do not sell the house(s) – so onward zero-rating is not possible
- any entity which cannot recover all of its input tax for various reasons
Aims
If it is not possible to structure matters so that these fees can be recovered (there are a number ways to do this, but not all will be available to all parties) then advisers need to consider ways to remove the VAT charge – this may also be preferable for cashflow purposes even if full input tax recovery is possible.
VAT Planning
Design and build – the steps
- the housebuilder creates a separately VAT registered design and build company (newco)
- newco purchases the professional services and construction services and incurs the VAT on these (the construction element is zero-rated)
- these supplies are incorporated into a single onward supply of zero-rated design and build services to the housebuilder (a bundle) – the professional services are a cost component of the construction
- zero rating applies to the supply to the housebuilder as the predominant supply of the bundle is the construction of new dwellings
- newco recovers the input tax incurred on professional fees etc, as it relates to an onward taxable supply
- newco is in a repayment position and HMRC refunds the VAT incurred on the costs – often after a pre-cred query
It is also possible to use an independent design and build company, or engage a contractor to carry out both the design and construction elements of the project with a similar result.
Considerations
It is important to implement the planning correctly. This means that appropriate contracts must be in place, the operation is carried out on sound business principles (actual supplies are made and it is not simply the moving of money).
Arrangements
In order to evidence the proper commerciality of the structure, it is important to bear in mind that:
- appropriate contracts are in place
- proper invoicing is required
- the arrangements are at arm’s length
- a profit for newco would emphasise the commercial aspect
- all parties’ accounts reflect the transactions
- newco combines all of its costs (including overheads/admin etc) and supplies them to the housebuilder as part of a single package of zero-rated design and build services
- newco acts as principal and not agent (that the professional services are not disbursements)
- the newco and the housebuilder are not in the same VAT group
- care should be taken if loans are required (they may compromise arm’s length and genuine commercial contentions)
HMRC’s view
In HMRC’s Internal Guidance Manual VCONST02720 it states that:
“Zero-rating the construction of buildings: services excluded from zero rating: design and build
Architectural or design services supplied as part of a design and build contract can be treated as part of the zero-rated supply of construction services.
A typical design and build contract will require the contractor to complete the design for the works and complete the construction of the works.
In such circumstances HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) sees the design element as a cost component of the construction and not as a separate supply of architectural services which would be liable to VAT at the standard rate”.
Consequently, this planning is recognised and accepted by HMRC, however, it is important that it is applied effectively so it is difficult for HMRC to challenge.